Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hofmeister Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$145k
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$253kHealth$215kReligion$195kHuman Services$55kArts & Culture$5kPublic Benefit$4kYouth Development$2kCommunity Improvement$600Other$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $4k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $141k
$200
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BLESSING FOUNDATION INC$40,200
CULVER STOCKTON COLLEGE$40,000
HOPE LUTHERAN CHURCH$26,000
SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY$20,000
CHEERFUL HOME$15,000
DOWN COUNTRY$1,000
QUINCY MUSEUM$500
WEST CENTRAL IL AREA AGENCY ON AGIN$500
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA$344
Individual grant recipient$250
QUINCY SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$200
FAITH BAPTIST CHURCH$100
ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL$100
HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF QUINCY & ADAM$100
BLESSED SACRAMENT CATHOLIC PARISH$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $53k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $200 → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $100 → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $40 → 14%CHEERFUL HOME: $15k → 13%CHEERFUL HOME: $15k → 13%CHEERFUL HOME: $7k → 13%CHEERFUL HOME: $5k → 13%CHEERFUL HOME: $3k → 13%CHEERFUL HOME: $3k → 13%CHEERFUL HOME: $2k → 13%CHEERFUL HOME: $2k → 13%QUINCY FAMILY YMCA: $100 → 13%QUINCY FAMILY YMCA: $100 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
NY
IA
IN
OH
MO
VA
MD
KS
TN
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$727k · 32 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

32 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
35

Total granted

$727k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+12%

Still filing today

63%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesPublic BenefitYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TB
    THE BLESSING FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $211k · revenue +210%
  • CH
    CHEERFUL HOME ASSOCIATION
    8× · 2017–2025 · $52k · revenue +57%
  • SL
    ST LOUIS UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2023–2025 · $40k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • AD
    ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $500 · revenue +3%
  • QP
    QUINCY PARK DISTRICT
    one grant, 2018 · $250
  • CS
    CINCINNATI SCPA FUND
    one grant, 2023 · $200
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Quinnipiac University

To build the university of the future with a strategy propelling us from our storied past toward an ambitious, inclusive & innovative future by preparing graduates as enlightened global citizens equipped for the challenges & opportunities…

Education
2
National Committee for Quality Assurance

Our mission: to improve the quality of health care.our vision: better health care. better choices. better health.

Health
3
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
4
Duquesne University of the Holy Spirit

Duquesne serves god by serving students-through commitment to excellence in liberal and professional education, through profound concern for moral and spiritual values, through the maintenance of an ecumenical atmosphere open to diversity,…

Education
5
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
7
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
10
Saint Anselm College

Saint anselm is a catholic, benedictine college providing all of its students a distinctive liberal arts education that incorporates opportunities for professional and career preparation. it does so in a learning community that encourages…

Education
11
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Friends of the Dr Richard Eells House. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 75 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
35/35
Grantees still filing
24/35
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CULVER-STOCKTON COLLEGE: $207,100 · EducationCULVER-STOCKTON COLLEGEST LOUIS UNIVERSITY: $40,000 · EducationST LOUIS UNIVERSITY+4 more: $5,220 · EducationTHE BLESSING FOUNDATION INC: $210,750 · HealthTHE BLESSING FOUNDATION INC+8 more: $4,271 · HealthHOPE LUTHERAN CHURCH: $193,618 · OtherHOPE LUTHERAN CHURCH+45 more: $9,767 · OtherCHEERFUL HOME ASSOCIATION: $52,000 · Human Services+2 more: $540 · Human ServicesTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $3,050 · Public BenefitDISABLED VETERANS NATIONAL FOUNDATION: $800 · Public BenefitUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC: $150 · Public BenefitTHE QUINCY MUSEUM INC: $1,200 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF THE DR RICHARD EELLS HOUSE: $700 · Arts & CultureQUINCY ART CENTER: $200 · Arts & CultureQUINCY COMMUNITY THEATRE: $100 · Arts & CultureHISTORICAL SOCIETY OF QUINCY & ADAMS COUNTY: $100 · Arts & CultureQUINCY SOCIETY OF FINE ARTS: $100 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $50 · Arts & CultureMISSISSIPPI VALLEY COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $1,614 · Youth Development
Education$252,320Health$215,021Other$203,385Human Services$52,540Public Benefit$4,000Arts & Culture$2,450Youth Development$1,614

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE BLESSING FOUNDATION INC: $210,750 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetCULVER-STOCKTON COLLEGE: $207,100 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetCHEERFUL HOME ASSOCIATION: $52,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetST LOUIS UNIVERSITY: $40,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $3,050 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetEUREKA COLLEGE: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDOWN COUNTRY: $2,621 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetQUINCY UNIVERSITY CORPORATION: $1,970 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMISSISSIPPI VALLEY COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $1,614 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE QUINCY MUSEUM INC: $1,200 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetDISABLED VETERANS NATIONAL FOUNDATION: $800 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE DR RICHARD EELLS HOUSE: $700 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetQUINCY SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $625 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $340 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetQUINCY PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetQUINCY NOTRE DAME FOUNDATION: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetQUINCY ART CENTER: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WEST CENTRAL ILLINOIS: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetQUINCY COMMUNITY THEATRE: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHISTORICAL SOCIETY OF QUINCY & ADAMS COUNTY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetQUINCY SOCIETY OF FINE ARTS: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetQUINCY HUMANE SOCIETY: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $27 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP CALLAHAN INC: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE BLESSING FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CULVER-STOCKTON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds CHEERFUL HOME ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EUREKA COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds DOWN COUNTRY ↗
  • Who funds QUINCY UNIVERSITY CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds MISSISSIPPI VALLEY COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds THE QUINCY MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds DISABLED VETERANS NATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE DR RICHARD EELLS HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds QUINCY PARK BAND INC ↗
  • Who funds QUINCY SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds QUINCY PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds QUINCY NOTRE DAME FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds QUINCY ART CENTER ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WEST CENTRAL ILLINOIS ↗
  • Who funds UNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of the Quincy AreaIL38.8× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Quincy Area · Michelmann Foundation · Marion G Jackson Char Tr · The Jw Gardner II Foundation · Nuessen Family Foundation · The Lindsay Family Foundation · Stillwell Foundation · The Cfm Foundation · Kunes Family Foundation · Ncrc Community Development Fund Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hofmeister Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hofmeister Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Hofmeister Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Hofmeister Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 75 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hofmeister’s filings →

More from the funding graph