Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hoag Family Charitable Fdn

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$461k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

International$575kHuman Services$432kReligion$426kFood & Nutrition$310kPublic Safety & Disaster$269kHealth$166kEducation$114kAnimals$107kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $88k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $338k
$5,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$3.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LION OF JUDAH MINISTRIES$100,000
CARE$100,000
SHERMAN CHURCH$88,000
UNICEF USA$50,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$35,000
CONNECTICUT HUMANE SOCIETY$13,000
SHERMAN HIGHER EDUCATION FUND$10,000
MY STUFF BAGS$10,000
SHERMAN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT$10,000
GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF WEST & NORTH CT$10,000
EVERWONDER CHILDREN'S MUSEUM$5,000
GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND$5,000
CONNECTICUT FOODSHARE$5,000
DELTA ZETA FOUNDATION$3,000
NEWTOWN VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE CORPS$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $211k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $5k → 9%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $5k → 9%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $200k → 14%FOR ALL AGES: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
WY
OH
CT
RI
CA
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.1M · 36 repeat orgs$765k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +20% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

36 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
28

Total granted

$2.1M
$759k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+11%

Still filing today

39%
18%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesInternationalAnimalsHealthArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF
    3× · 2023–2025 · $150k · revenue +1%
  • CH
    CONNECTICUT HUMANE SOCIETY
    3× · 2023–2025 · $48k · revenue +52%
  • SL
    SHERMAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $30k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • LF
    LOAVES & FISHES HOSPITALITY
    one grant, 2021 · $200k
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    one grant, 2024 · $200k · revenue +3%
  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    one grant, 2024 · $100k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
2
Connecticut Association of Health Care Facilities Inc

The association is the leader in providing services to and advocating for, the state's providers of long-term, subacute, rehabilitative, and assisted living care. additionally, the association serves as a clearing house for information…

—
3
Connecticut Farmland Trust Inc

Protect Connecticuts farmland for agricultural use by purchasing and accepting donations of agricultural conservation easements

Food & Nutrition
4
The Humane Society of Harford County Inc

The humane society of harford county's mission is to promote the humane treatment of homeless, stray and abandoned animals by providing shelter, care, adoptions and community education.

Animals
5
Connecticut Aeronautical Historical Association Inc

The new england air museum's mission is to preserve and present the story of aviation and aerospace, with an emphasis on new england's role, and the genius and inspiration that made it possible. the museum also seeks to inspire young…

Arts & Culture
6
Harvard Conservation Trust

To preserve the unique character and natural resources of harvard.

Environment
7
Wethersfield Historical Society

The purpose of the "Society" is to collect, preserve, and interpret Wethersfield's past for the education and enjoyment of present and future generations.

Arts & Culture
8
Hebrew Health Care Foundation Inc

Managing endowment funds for hebrew health care and affiliates.

—
9
The Humane Society for Seattleking County

Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.

Animals
10
Norwalk Seaport Association Inc

The norwalk seaport association, inc. offers a cultural, environmental, and historical journey to the norwalk islands. the sheffield island lighthouse and the light keeper's cottage provide a unique historical and educational venue which…

Arts & Culture
11
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
12
Hartford Foundation for Public Giving

The hartford foundation for public giving puts philanthropy into action to create lasting solutions that result in vibrant communities within the greater hartford region. as the region's community foundation, it is a public, grantmaking…

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Connecticut Children's Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Sherman Higher Education Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 68 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/23
Grantees still filing
15/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICARES: $265,000 · OtherAMERICARESTHE SHERMAN CHURCH: $248,000 · OtherTHE SHERMAN CHURCHLOAVES & FISHES HOSPITALITY: $200,000 · OtherLOAVES & FISHES HOSPITALITYCARE: $150,000 · OtherCARESHERMAN CHURCH: $149,000 · OtherSHERMAN CHURCHTHE SALVATION ARMY: $100,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMY: $90,000 · OtherLION OF JUDAH MINISTRIES: $87,000 · Other+47 more: $639,500 · Other+47 moreCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $250,000 · InternationalCOOPERATIVE FOR…UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $150,000 · InternationalUNITED STATES F…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $200,000 · Human ServicesGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $10,000 · Human Services+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesLION OF JUDAH MINISTRIES INC: $125,000 · HealthCONNECTICUT CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · HealthSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $100,000 · ReligionSHERMAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION INC: $30,000 · EducationMY STUFF BAGS FOUNDATION: $25,000 · EducationDelta Zeta Foundation: $7,000 · EducationCONNECTICUT HUMANE SOCIETY: $48,000 · AnimalsWILD HORSE PRESERVATION SOCIETY: $6,000 · Animals
Other$1,928,500International$400,000Human Services$211,000Health$130,000Religion$100,000Education$62,000Animals$54,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $250,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $200,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $150,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLION OF JUDAH MINISTRIES INC: $125,000 over 2y, 27% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONNECTICUT HUMANE SOCIETY: $48,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSHERMAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION INC: $30,000 over 2y, 4.6% of budgetSHERMAN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $30,000 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetMY STUFF BAGS FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetNEWTOWN CHILDRENS MUSEUM INC: $16,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetNEWTOWN HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $10,000 over 3y, 3.7% of budgetGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCONNECTICUT BURNS CARE FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetCATHERINE VIOLET HUBBARD FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetDelta Zeta Foundation: $7,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWILD HORSE PRESERVATION SOCIETY: $6,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetTHE SHERMAN HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetCONNECTICUT CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEWTOWN FOREST ASSOCIATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetTHE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF HARTFORD: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOR ALL AGES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds LION OF JUDAH MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTICUT HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds SHERMAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SHERMAN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT ↗
  • Who funds MY STUFF BAGS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Sherman Higher Education Fund Inc ↗
  • Who funds NEWTOWN CHILDRENS MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds NEWTOWN HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Richard and Bette Saltzman FoundationNY13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Richard and Bette Saltzman Foundation · Jeniam Foundation · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hoag Family Charitable Fdn funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hoag Family Charitable Fdn. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • The Boys and Girls Clubs of Hartford: 20% of income from government
  • Connecticut Foodshare Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Sherman Volunteer Fire Department: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 68 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hoag Family Charitable Fdn’s filings →

More from the funding graph