· Private foundation
Jeniam Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k29 grants · $100k
- $10k–50k24 grants · $521k
- $50k–250k10 grants · $835k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NEW YORK COMMUNITY TRUST LONG ISLAND | $150,000 |
| WAVENY LIFECARE NETWORK INC | $100,000 |
| BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY | $100,000 |
| WAVENY PARK CONSERVANCY INC | $100,000 |
| NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY CT & NY | $85,000 |
| EVERWONDER CHILDREN'S MUSEUM | $75,000 |
| NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY CT & NY | $75,000 |
| BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY | $50,000 |
| WOLF CONSERVATION CENTER INC | $50,000 |
| AMERICAN BIRD CONSERVANCY | $50,000 |
| DANBURY ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY INC | $41,000 |
| NEW MEXICO WILDERNESS ALLIANCE | $40,000 |
| EARTHPLACE THE NATURE DISCOVERY CENTER INC | $40,000 |
| HORIZONS NATIONAL | $40,000 |
| NEWTOWN-SANDY HOOK COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC | $35,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +52% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.
58 repeat relationships — 29 still active in FY2024, 29 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $438k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY5× · 2020–2024 · $535k · revenue +39%- WPWAVENY PARK CONSERVANCY INC5× · 2020–2024 · $354k · revenue +101% · 43% of their budget
- OLORCHESTRA LUMOS INC4× · 2020–2023 · $350k · revenue +23%
Funded once
- NANATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY OF CT & NYone grant, 2023 · $170k
- HNHORIZONS NATIONAL STUDENT ENRICHMENT PROGRAM INCone grant, 2020 · $40k · revenue -24%
- PMPURPLE MARTIN CONSERVATION ASSOCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $24k · revenue +38%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The connecticut humane society is the leading resource in the state for companion animal welfare, enriching the lives of families and communities through adoption services, medical care, education, and prevention of cruelty.
The nantucket conservation foundation owns, protects, and stewards over 9,000 acres of land and coastal shoreline, conserves nantucket's rare and significant natural resources, and engages in impactful ecological research to inform…
The natural areas conservancy champions urban natural areas in new york city and across the nation through innovative research, partnerships, and advocacy. we increase the health and resilience of urban forests and wetlands, catalyze…
The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.
The adirondack council ensures the ecological integrity (clean water and air, wildlife habitat, etc.), wild character (solitude, scenic beauty, etc.), and vibrant communities of new york's six-million-acre adirondack park. the adirondack…
Northeast wilderness trust is a regional land trust working to preserve and restore forever-wild landscapes for nature and people in new york, vermont, new hampshire, maine, massachusetts and connecticut.
See schedule onylcv is a non-partisan policy making and political action organization that works to make environmental protection a top priority with elected officials, decision-makers and the voters by evaluating incumbent performance and…
Northern neck land conservancy's mission is to preserve the rural heritage of the northern neck and essex county by conserving their lands, water, economies and culture for future generations. the land conservancy assists landowners who…
The wildlands trust works throughout southeastern massachusetts to conserve and permanently protect native habitats, farmland, and lands of high ecologic and scenic value that serve to keep our communities healthy and our residents…
The Land Conservancy of Ridgefield, Inc. ("the Land Conservancy"), founded in 1967, preserves and protects, for the general benefit of the public, Ridgefield, Connecticut's natural resources including land and water resources, the plant…
The connecticut river conservancy (crc) restores and advocates for clean water, healthy habitats, and resilient communicities to support a diverse and thriving watershed. through collaborative partnerships in new hampshire, vermont, and…
The nassau county society for the prevention of cruelty to animals is a 501(c)(3) organized to protect animals from abuse and neglect.(see schedule o)the nassau county society for the prevention of cruelty to animals is a 501(c)(3)…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Canaan Land Conservation Trust Inc and the most unlike its peers is Armys Legacy Animal Rescue and Sanctuary Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
86 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 86 of the 126 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds WAVENY PARK CONSERVANCY INC ↗
- Who funds ORCHESTRA LUMOS INC ↗
- Who funds WOLF CONSERVATION CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds NEWTOWN CHILDRENS MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds American Bird Conservancy ↗
- Who funds SAVE THE SOUND ↗
- Who funds NEW MEXICO WILDERNESS ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds EARTHPLACE INC ↗
- Who funds ANIMAL HUMANE ASSOCIATION OF NEW MEXICO INC ↗
- Who funds NEWTOWN-SANDY HOOK COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE NEW CANAAN LIBRARY INC ↗
- Who funds NEW CANAAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds SUMMER THEATRE OF NEW CANAAN INC ↗
- Who funds Kids Empowered by Your Support Inc ↗
- Who funds NEWTOWN FOREST ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds CONNECTICUT INSTITUTE FOR REFUGEES AND IMMIGRANTS INC ↗
- Who funds NEW CANAAN CHAMBER MUSIC INC ↗
- Who funds FURRY FRIENDS FOSTER AND RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds THE MARITIME AQUARIUM AT NORWALK INC ↗
- Who funds GROUNDWORK BRIDGEPORT INC ↗
- Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds NEW CANAAN LAND CONSERVATION TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds DANBURY ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds HORIZONS NATIONAL STUDENT ENRICHMENT PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds CITIZENS CAMPAIGN FUND FOR THE ENVIRONMENT INC ↗
- Who funds THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND ↗
- Who funds Global Forest Generation ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: New Canaan Community Foundation Inc · Fairfield County's Community Foundation Inc · Connecticut Humanities Council Inc · Jim and Dede Bartlett Foundation · The Seelert Foundation Inc · MLE Foundation Inc · Hobbs Family Charitable Trust · The Bauer Family Foundation Inc · The Scripps Family Fund for Education and the Arts · The a James Bach and Vona Hopkins Foundation Inc · Corbet Family Foundation · The Queenan Fdn Acct
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Jeniam Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Groundwork Bridgeport Inc — 100% of income from government
- Save the Sound — 37% of income from government
- Connecticut Institute for Refugees and Immigrants Inc — 37% of income from government
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Massaro Community Farm Inc — 27% of income from government
- Connecticut Council for Philanthropy — 24% of income from government
- Real Food Ct — 17% of income from government
- Art Council of Greater New Haven Inc — 14% of income from government
- Connecticut Land Conservation Council Inc — 12% of income from government
- The Maritime Aquarium at Norwalk Inc — 5% of income from government
- Orchestra Lumos Inc — 1% of income from government
- Stepping Stones Museum for Children Inc — 1% of income from government
- Summer Theatre of New Canaan Inc — 1% of income from government
- Connecticut Audubon Society Inc — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.