Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Hinman Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$135k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$90k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$1.0MInternational$224kAnimals$54kHuman Services$45kEnvironment$35kPublic Benefit$20kFood & Nutrition$16kYouth Development$11kOther$0
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $45k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $90k
$25,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Children of Vietnam$90,000
Veterans RR - Operation Wild Horse$25,000
Wikimedia Foundation$10,000
University of Maryland College Park$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–18, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%4 Paws for Ability: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
IL
NY
MA
OH
CA
VA
MD
NC
DC
MS
AL
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.1M · 7 repeat orgs$352k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +88% since the first grant, against +31% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
29

Total granted

$1.1M
$317k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+88%
+31%

Still filing today

57%
76%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalAnimalsCivil RightsEducationFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WF
    WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $199k · revenue +29%
  • CO
    CHILDREN OF VIETNAM
    3× · 2022–2024 · $191k · revenue +173%
  • UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2019–2023 · $110k · revenue +72%

Funded once

  • GEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue +214%
  • UV
    UCLA Ventures Endowed Scholarship
    one grant, 2018 · $50k
  • UW
    US WATER PARTNERSHIP
    one grant, 2023 · $35k · revenue -100%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
2
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
3
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
4
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

5
United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee

Empowering the competitive excellence and well-being of team usa athletes, championing the power of sport, and inspiring the nation.

Recreation & Sports
6
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
7
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

8
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
9
Internet Society Foundation

At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…

International
10
Waterorg

Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.

International
11
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
12
American Flood Coalition Inc

To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Immigration Law Center and the most unlike its peers is Mississippi Immigrant Rights Allian. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyChristian Missionary Organi…Veteran Support ServicesMuslim Community Organizati…Homeless Services & ShelterCancer Support OrganizationsYouth Development CentersCommunity Arts OrganizationsLegal Aid & Immigration Ser…Food Pantries & AssistanceAnimal Rescue and AdoptionPublic University Foundatio…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%4%10–20yr16%39%20–35yr13%15%35–55yr16%39%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%0%10–20yr16%62%20–35yr13%2%35–55yr16%32%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%1/29
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,536

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/28
Grantees still filing
21/28
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MIT Sandbox Innovation Fund — $284,000 · OtherMIT Sandbox Innovation FundSt Andrew's Episcopal School — $195,158 · OtherSt Andrew's Episcopal SchoolMIT Public Service Center — $56,000 · OtherMIT Public Service CenterUCLA Ventures Endowed Scholarship — $50,000 · OtherUCLA Ventures Endowed ScholarshipUS WATER PARTNERSHIP — $35,000 · OtherMIT Jameel Poverty Action Lab — $25,000 · OtherVeterans RR - Operation Wild Horse — $25,000 · Other+16 more — $72,735 · Other+16 moreWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC — $199,000 · EducationWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INCUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION INC — $110,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PA…GEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 · EducationGEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION INCUCLA FOUNDATION — $20,000 · EducationCHILDREN OF VIETNAM — $191,000 · InternationalCHILDREN OF VIE…+3 more — $3,000 · InternationalSociety for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals for Monterey County — $43,000 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF VENTURA COUNTY — $5,000 · Animals+1 more — $1,000 · AnimalsWreaths Across America — $20,000 · Public BenefitREDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK — $10,000 · Food & NutritionNATIONAL IMMIGRATION LAW CENTER — $5,000 · Civil RightsCAIR-FOUNDATION INC — $440 · Civil Rights+1 more — $100 · Civil Rights
Other$742,893Education$429,000International$194,000Animals$49,000Public Benefit$20,000Food & Nutrition$10,000Civil Rights$5,540

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC — $199,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN OF VIETNAM — $191,000 over 3y, 7.7% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION INC — $110,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSociety for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals for Monterey County — $43,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetUS WATER PARTNERSHIP — $35,000 over 1y, 7.1% of budgetWreaths Across America — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget4 PAWS FOR ABILITY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBoys & Girls Clubs of Monterey County — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmericans for the Arts Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJR POSSE YOUTH EQUESTRIAN PROGRAM — $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNATIONAL IMMIGRATION LAW CENTER — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF VENTURA COUNTY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR MONTEREY COUNTY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOUSTON HUMANE SOCIETY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOMEFIRST SERVICES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Houston Food Bank — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INTREPID FALLEN HEROES FUND — $660 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAIR-FOUNDATION INC — $440 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMISSISSIPPI IMMIGRANT RIGHTS ALLIAN — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA11.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Hinman Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Hinman Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Hinman Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph