· Private foundation
Hilltop Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k46 grants · $161k
- $10k–50k19 grants · $212k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK | $17,500 |
| DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS | $15,000 |
| NATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS | $15,000 |
| DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS | $12,500 |
| WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN | $12,000 |
| CHRONICLE SEASON OF SHARING | $10,000 |
| CANAL COMMUNITY ALLIANCE | $10,000 |
| FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC | $10,000 |
| ALAMEDA CO COMM FOOD BANK | $10,000 |
| THE OAKLAND ZOO | $10,000 |
| LARKIN ST YOUTH SERVICES | $10,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AM | $10,000 |
| SPECIAL OPERATION WARRIOR | $10,000 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS BAY AREA | $10,000 |
| MARIN COMMUNITY CLINIC | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $418k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
86 repeat relationships — 60 still active in FY2025, 26 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SFSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK9× · 2017–2025 · $146k · revenue +74%
- ANAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches9× · 2017–2025 · $100k · revenue +46%
- CSCHRONICLE SEASON OF SHARING FUND9× · 2017–2025 · $98k · revenue +96%
Funded once
- FBFOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANOgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +136%
- FSFAMILY SVC AGENCY OF MARINone grant, 2017 · $10k
- FSFAMILY SERVICE AGENCY OF MARINone grant, 2018 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.
The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.
The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.
United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.
The SPCA Monterey County's Mission is assuring compassionate treatment of all animals through rescue, rehabilitation, protection and education. The SPCA shelters homeless, neglected, and abused pets, including dogs, cats, horses, exotic…
The San Francisco Bay Bird Observatory is dedicated to the conservation of birds and their habitats through science and outreach.
Kaiser foundation for the advancement of integrated health care is a nonprofit 501(c)(4) advocacy organization to engage in proactive advocacy to promote understanding of the benefits of integrated care and coverage, and support of the…
Santa barbara humane operates two campuses located in santa barbara and santa maria providing care for community-owned and homeless animals. both campuses offer affordable high quality veterinary care, compassionate behavior training…
The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…
Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.
On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…
The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is By the Bay Health and the most unlike its peers is Tiburon Peninsula Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
72 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 72 of the 119 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds CHRONICLE SEASON OF SHARING FUND ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MARIN COMMUNITY CLINIC ↗
- Who funds OREGON FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds NAMI National ↗
- Who funds Larkin Street Youth Services ↗
- Who funds Disabled American Veterans ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds CONSERVATION SOCIETY OF CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds HAMILTON FAMILIES ↗
- Who funds BUCKELEW PROGRAMS ↗
- Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION MARIN ↗
- Who funds PUPPIES BEHIND BARS INC ↗
- Who funds Homeward Bound of Marin ↗
- Who funds REDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds KQED INC ↗
- Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds Vivalon ↗
- Who funds HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS INC ↗
- Who funds WARRIOR CANINE CONNECTION INC ↗
- Who funds Project Open Hand ↗
- Who funds OCEAN CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
- Who funds THE SAN FRANCISCO SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
- Who funds Ambulatory Surgery Access Coalition ↗
- Who funds Gilead House ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Marin Community Foundation · McNabb Foundation · Leonard & Beryl Buck Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Hobsonlucas Family Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Extrafood · The William H Donner Foundation Inc · Heffernan Group Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Sonoma County Community Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Hilltop Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Oregon Food Bank — 21% of income from government
- United Way of the Mid-Willamette Valley — 6% of income from government
- Warrior Canine Connection Inc — 5% of income from government
- The Oregon Community Foundation — 2% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Hilltop Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Hilltop Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.