Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hilltop Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$373k
Granted FY2025still arriving
65
Grants FY2025still arriving
13
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$620kHuman Services$530kHealth$403kInternational$179kAnimals$178kYouth Development$151kEnvironment$147kHousing & Shelter$144kOther$0
02FY2025 · 65 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k46 grants · $161k
  • $10k–50k19 grants · $212k
$5,000
Median grant
13
States reached
$5.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK$17,500
NATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS$15,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$15,000
DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS$12,500
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$12,000
KQED$10,000
SPECIAL OPERATION WARRIOR$10,000
DIRECT RELIEF$10,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AM$10,000
CHRONICLE SEASON OF SHARING$10,000
LARKIN ST YOUTH SERVICES$10,000
MARIN COMMUNITY CLINIC$10,000
OREGON FOOD BANK$10,000
ALAMEDA CO COMM FOOD BANK$10,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS BAY AREA$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $418k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%PUPPIES BEHIND BARS INC: $8k → 17%HUCKELBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS INC: $5k → 10%PUPPIES BEHIND BARS INC: $6k → 17%HUCKELBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS INC: $5k → 10%PUPPIES BEHIND BARS INC: $6k → 17%WARRIOR CANINE CONNECTION: $5k → 8%HUCKELBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS INC: $5k → 10%PUPPIES BEHIND BARS INC: $5k → 17%HUCKELBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS INC: $5k → 10%PUPPIES BEHIND BARS INC: $5k → 17%WARRIOR CANINE CONNECTION: $5k → 8%HUCKELBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS INC: $5k → 10%PUPPIES BEHIND BARS INC: $5k → 17%PUPPIES BEHIND BARS INC: $5k → 17%WARRIOR CANINE CONNECTION: $5k → 8%PUPPIES BEHIND BARS INC: $5k → 17%WARRIOR CANINE CONNECTION: $5k → 8%COMMUNITY ACTION MARIN: $8k → 8%COMMUNITY ACTION MARIN: $5k → 8%COMMUNITY ACTION MARIN: $5k → 8%COMMUNITY ACTION MARIN: $5k → 8%COMMUNITY ACTION MARIN: $5k → 8%COMMUNITY ACTION MARIN: $5k → 8%COMMUNITY ACTION MARIN: $5k → 8%LARKIN ST YOUTH SERVICES: $10k → 10%LARKIN ST YOUTH SERVICES: $10k → 10%LARKIN ST YOUTH SERVICES: $10k → 10%LARKIN ST YOUTH SERVICES: $10k → 10%LARKIN ST YOUTH SERVICES: $10k → 10%LARKIN ST YOUTH SERVICES: $5k → 10%LARKIN ST YOUTH SERVICES: $5k → 10%LARKIN ST YOUTH SERVICES: $5k → 10%LARKIN ST YOUTH SERVICES: $5k → 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS BAY AREA: $10k → 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS BAY AREA: $15k → 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS BAY AREA: $15k → 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS BAY AREA: $10k → 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS BAY AREA: $10k → 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS BAY AREA: $10k → 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS BAY AREA: $10k → 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS BAY AREA: $10k → 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS BAY AREA: $10k → 10%COMMUNITY ACTION MARIN: $8k → 8%COMMUNITY ACTION MARIN: $8k → 8%VIVALON: $5k → 8%WHISTLESTOP: $5k → 8%VIVALON: $5k → 8%WHISTLESTOP: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
OR
IA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
KY
VA
MD
KS
TN
DC
HI
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.8M · 86 repeat orgs$89k to everyone else

86 repeat relationships: 60 still active in FY2025, 26 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

86
25

Total granted

$2.8M
$73k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
+79%

Still filing today

71%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesAnimalsFood & NutritionInternationalHealthEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    SAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK
    9× · 2017–2025 · $146k · revenue +74%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    9× · 2017–2025 · $100k · revenue +46%
  • CS
    CHRONICLE SEASON OF SHARING FUND
    9× · 2017–2025 · $98k · revenue +96%

Funded once

  • FS
    FAMILY SVC AGENCY OF MARIN
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • FS
    FAMILY SERVICE AGENCY OF MARIN
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • FB
    FOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANOgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +136%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
2
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
3
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
4
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
5
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals for Monterey County

The SPCA Monterey County's Mission is assuring compassionate treatment of all animals through rescue, rehabilitation, protection and education. The SPCA shelters homeless, neglected, and abused pets, including dogs, cats, horses, exotic…

Animals
6
San Francisco Bay Bird Observatory

The San Francisco Bay Bird Observatory is dedicated to the conservation of birds and their habitats through science and outreach.

Environment
7
Kaiser Foundation for the Advancement of Integrated Health Care

Kaiser foundation for the advancement of integrated health care is a nonprofit 501(c)(4) advocacy organization to engage in proactive advocacy to promote understanding of the benefits of integrated care and coverage, and support of the…

Health
8
Santa Barbara Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

Santa barbara humane operates two campuses located in santa barbara and santa maria providing care for community-owned and homeless animals. both campuses offer affordable high quality veterinary care, compassionate behavior training…

Animals
9
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
10
The Humane Society for Seattleking County

Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.

Animals
11
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
12
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is By the Bay Health; the most unlike its peers is Tiburon Peninsula Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

72 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 72 of the 119 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
72/72
Grantees still filing
57/72
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK: $146,000 · OtherSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANKALAMEDA CO COMM FOOD BANK: $110,000 · OtherALAMEDA CO COMM FOOD BANKCANAL COMMUNITY ALLIANCE: $90,000 · OtherCANAL COMMUNITY ALLIANCEFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $90,000 · OtherFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INCOREGON FOOD BANK: $80,500 · OtherOREGON FOOD BANKSWORDS TO PLOWSHARES: $75,000 · OtherFOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTASOLANO: $75,000 · OtherSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $70,000 · OtherDisabled American Veterans: $70,000 · OtherNATIONAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL: $54,000 · OtherSPECIAL OPERATION WARRIOR: $50,000 · Other+64 more: $527,350 · Other+64 moreAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $100,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National…Larkin Street Youth Services: $70,000 · Human ServicesLarkin Street You…COMMUNITY ACTION MARIN: $52,500 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY ACTION …PUPPIES BEHIND BARS INC: $47,500 · Human ServicesPUPPIES BEHIND BA…WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $40,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR P…Vivalon: $39,000 · Human ServicesVivalonHUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS INC: $35,000 · Human ServicesHUCKLEBERRY YOUTH…WARRIOR CANINE CONNECTION INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesWARRIOR CANINE CO…RAPHAEL HOUSE OF SAN FRANCISCO INC: $18,000 · Human Services+3 more: $26,000 · Human Services+3 moreMARIN COMMUNITY CLINIC: $90,000 · HealthMARIN COMMUN…NAMI National: $75,000 · HealthNAMI Nationa…PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $60,000 · HealthPLANNED PARE…BUCKELEW PROGRAMS: $57,500 · HealthBUCKELEW PRO…Ambulatory Surgery Access Coalition: $22,500 · HealthAmbulatory S…+1 more: $4,000 · HealthCHRONICLE SEASON OF SHARING FUND: $97,500 · Food & NutritionREDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK: $45,000 · Food & NutritionProject Open Hand: $29,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANO: $10,000 · Food & Nutrition+2 more: $11,000 · Food & NutritionMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $95,000 · InternationalDIRECT RELIEF: $56,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $22,000 · InternationalRESURGE INTERNATIONAL: $9,000 · International+2 more: $8,000 · InternationalCONSERVATION SOCIETY OF CALIFORNIA: $60,000 · AnimalsTHE SAN FRANCISCO SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $25,000 · AnimalsMARIN HUMANE SOCIETY: $22,000 · AnimalsMUTTVILLE: $20,000 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF SONOMA COUNTY: $19,000 · AnimalsTHE ELEPHANT SANCTUARY IN TENNESSEE: $9,000 · Animals+4 more: $13,250 · AnimalsHAMILTON FAMILIES: $60,000 · Housing & ShelterHomeward Bound of Marin: $45,000 · Housing & ShelterGilead House: $22,500 · Housing & ShelterMARIN CENTER FOR INDENPENDENT LIVING: $21,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$1,437,850Human Services$458,000Health$309,000Food & Nutrition$192,500International$190,000Animals$168,250Housing & Shelter$148,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK: $146,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $100,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCHRONICLE SEASON OF SHARING FUND: $97,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $95,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMARIN COMMUNITY CLINIC: $90,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $90,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetOREGON FOOD BANK: $80,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNAMI National: $75,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLarkin Street Youth Services: $70,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetDisabled American Veterans: $70,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHAMILTON FAMILIES: $60,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCONSERVATION SOCIETY OF CALIFORNIA: $60,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $60,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBUCKELEW PROGRAMS: $57,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF: $56,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION MARIN: $52,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetPUPPIES BEHIND BARS INC: $47,500 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetHomeward Bound of Marin: $45,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetREDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK: $45,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $40,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetKQED INC: $40,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetVivalon: $39,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS INC: $35,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetWARRIOR CANINE CONNECTION INC: $30,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetProject Open Hand: $29,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $29,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SAN FRANCISCO SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAmbulatory Surgery Access Coalition: $22,500 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetGilead House: $22,500 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetMARIN HUMANE SOCIETY: $22,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $22,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMARIN CENTER FOR INDENPENDENT LIVING: $21,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetMUTTVILLE: $20,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF SONOMA COUNTY: $19,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetRAPHAEL HOUSE OF SAN FRANCISCO INC: $18,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetLegal Assistance to the Elderly: $17,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetLIFEHOUSE INC: $17,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO AIDS FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSONOMA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPRO PUBLICA INC: $15,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLEGAL AID OF MARIN: $14,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetBY THE BAY HEALTH: $14,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTiburon Peninsula Foundation: $14,000 over 4y, 5.6% of budgetOCEANA INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE OREGON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANO: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ELEPHANT SANCTUARY IN TENNESSEE: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds CHRONICLE SEASON OF SHARING FUND ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds MARIN COMMUNITY CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds OREGON FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds NAMI National ↗
  • Who funds Larkin Street Youth Services ↗
  • Who funds Disabled American Veterans ↗
  • Who funds HAMILTON FAMILIES ↗
  • Who funds CONSERVATION SOCIETY OF CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds BUCKELEW PROGRAMS ↗
  • Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION MARIN ↗
  • Who funds PUPPIES BEHIND BARS INC ↗
  • Who funds Homeward Bound of Marin ↗
  • Who funds REDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds KQED INC ↗
  • Who funds Vivalon ↗
  • Who funds HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS INC ↗
  • Who funds WARRIOR CANINE CONNECTION INC ↗
  • Who funds Project Open Hand ↗
  • Who funds OCEAN CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds THE SAN FRANCISCO SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Ambulatory Surgery Access Coalition ↗
  • Who funds Gilead House ↗
  • Who funds MARIN HUMANE SOCIETY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Marin Community FoundationCA32.2× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Marin Community Foundation · McNabb Foundation · Leonard & Beryl Buck Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Hobsonlucas Family Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Extrafood · The William H Donner Foundation Inc · Heffernan Group Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Sonoma County Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hilltop Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hilltop Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Oregon Food Bank: 21% of income from government
  • United Way of the Mid-Willamette Valley: 6% of income from government
  • Warrior Canine Connection Inc: 5% of income from government
  • The Oregon Community Foundation: 2% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Hilltop Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Hilltop Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 119 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hilltop’s filings →

More from the funding graph