Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hill Foundation for Families Living with Disabilities

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$34k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it funds
0182% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$122kHealth$70kEducation$57kPhilanthropy$13kReligion$7kCommunity Improvement$2kInternational$2kHuman Services$972Other$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $13k
$1,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$78k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Ruth Page Foundation$13,372
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Skidmore College$5,000
Shirley Ryan Ability Lab$2,000
various 500$1,900
Access Living$1,500
Jewish United Fund$1,500
Key West Literary Seminar$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Shriners Hospital for Children$500
Chicago Public Library Foundation$500
Francis W Parker School$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $410) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Shalva: $360 → 14%poor people's campaign: $50 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
NY
MA
IN
CT
MO
VA
MD
TN
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$324k · 30 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

30 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
37

Total granted

$324k
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+17%

Still filing today

53%
51%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHealthPhilanthropyInternationalCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TR
    THE RUTH PAGE FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $106k · revenue +25%
  • SC
    SKIDMORE COLLEGE
    7× · 2017–2025 · $52k · revenue +34%
  • RI
    Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago
    9× · 2017–2025 · $41k · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • DW
    dancing with chicago celebs
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
  • SM
    Sheba Medical Center
    one grant, 2024 · $1k
  • FI
    FWDUS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $500 · revenue +427%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chicago Opera Theater

Chicago opera theater expands the tradition of opera as a living art form by engaging lovers of music and storytelling through innovative experiences, predominantly of new and rarely performed works.

Arts & Culture
2
University of Chicago

The mission of the university of chicago has been to sustain at the highest level of excellence, the communication of knowledge, the creation of knowledge and the fostering of a dynamic community of scholars and students.

Education
3
True Chicago
Arts & Culture
4
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
5
Lyric Opera of Chicago

We believe in the life-changing, transformational, revelatory power of great art and opera. Lyric Opera of Chicago exists to provide a broad, deep, and relevant cultural service to the Chicago region and the nation, and to advance the…

Arts & Culture
6
Chicago Public Education Fund

The chicago public education fund (the fund) is a nonprofit organization that improves public schools in chicago by investing in the talented educators who lead them.

Education
7
Lookingglass Theatre Company

Lookingglass theatre company is a national leader in the creation and presentation of innovative, cutting-edge theatrical work. lookingglass interweaves movement, circus arts and narrative in original and captivating ways. guided by an…

Arts & Culture
8
Loyola University of Chicago

We are chicago's jesuit, catholic university - a diverse community seeking god in all things and working to expand knowledge in the service of humanity through learning, justice, and faith.

Education
9
Chamber Opera of Chicago
—
10
The Chicago High School for the Arts

The chicago high school for the arts (chiarts) develops the next generation of diverse, artistically promising scholar-artists through intensive pre-professional training in the arts, combined with a comprehensive college preparatory…

Education
11
Chicago City Theatre Company dba Joel Hall Dancers & Center

To enrich the lives of our community through dance education and performance while developing Chicago's native talent pool in a welcoming environment that celebrates multiculturalism & ethnic diversity.

Arts & Culture
12
Music Institute of Chicago

The music institute of chicago ("music institute") leads people toward a lifelong engagement with music, by providing widely accessible resources for high quality music teaching, performing, and service activities.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Access Living of Metropolitan Chicago; the most unlike its peers is Karen Dove Cabral Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 69 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
36/38
Grantees still filing
23/38
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE RUTH PAGE FOUNDATION: $106,076 · OtherTHE RUTH PAGE FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $37,100 · OtherIndividual grant recipientAccess Living of Metropolitan Chicago: $22,500 · OtherAccess Living of Metropolitan ChicagoIndividual grant recipient: $12,102 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+42 more: $39,542 · Other+42 moreSKIDMORE COLLEGE: $52,200 · EducationSKIDMORE COLLEGEFrancis W Parker School: $3,600 · EducationFrancis W Parker Sc…+3 more: $900 · EducationRehabilitation Institute of Chicago: $41,204 · HealthRehabilitation…+2 more: $550 · HealthJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $12,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $400 · PhilanthropyCHICAGO SHAKESPEARE THEATER: $1,961 · Arts & CultureCourt Theatre Fund: $1,300 · Arts & CultureMERIT SCHOOL OF MUSIC: $500 · Arts & CultureVIETNAM HELICOPTER PILOTS ASSOCIATION: $300 · Arts & CultureSTEPPENWOLF THEATRE COMPANY: $250 · Arts & CultureCHICAGO THEATRE GROUP INC: $250 · Arts & CultureMADISON BALLET INC: $200 · Arts & CultureChicago Dance Health Fund: $200 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART: $185 · Arts & CultureKENYAN HEALTH CARE INITIATIVES INC: $1,600 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $100 · InternationalK9 ENRICHMENT INITIATIVE INC: $500 · AnimalsAmerican Bird Conservancy: $200 · Animals
Other$217,320Education$56,700Health$41,754Philanthropy$12,400Arts & Culture$5,146International$1,700Animals$700

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE RUTH PAGE FOUNDATION: $106,076 over 9y, 1.0% of budgetSKIDMORE COLLEGE: $52,200 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetRehabilitation Institute of Chicago: $41,204 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAccess Living of Metropolitan Chicago: $22,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $12,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetKEY WEST LITERARY SEMINAR INC: $7,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetFrancis W Parker School: $3,600 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO SHAKESPEARE THEATER: $1,961 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetKENYAN HEALTH CARE INITIATIVES INC: $1,600 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetJEWISH COUNCIL FOR YOUTH SERVICES: $650 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFWDUS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLINDA SCHULMAN INNOVATION FUND INC: $500 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetMERIT SCHOOL OF MUSIC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKAREN DOVE CABRAL FOUNDATION: $400 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetLITERATURE FOR ALL OF US: $400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSHALVA INC: $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $350 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVIETNAM HELICOPTER PILOTS ASSOCIATION: $300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPRIMO CENTER FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLIFEWORK DIRECTION: $288 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTEPPENWOLF THEATRE COMPANY: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEnsemble Espanol: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO THEATRE GROUP INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMADISON BALLET INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChicago Dance Health Fund: $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Bird Conservancy: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART: $185 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPROSPER CHICAGO INC: $167 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR JEWISH WOMEN CHICAGO NORTH SHORE SECTION: $102 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIRLS IN THE GAME NFP: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST LOUIS UNIVERSITY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE RUTH PAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SKIDMORE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds Access Living of Metropolitan Chicago ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds KEY WEST LITERARY SEMINAR INC ↗
  • Who funds Francis W Parker School ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO SHAKESPEARE THEATER ↗
  • Who funds KENYAN HEALTH CARE INITIATIVES INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COUNCIL FOR YOUTH SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds FWDUS INC ↗
  • Who funds K9 ENRICHMENT INITIATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LINDA SCHULMAN INNOVATION FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds MERIT SCHOOL OF MUSIC ↗
  • Who funds KAREN DOVE CABRAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LITERATURE FOR ALL OF US ↗
  • Who funds SHALVA INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds VIETNAM HELICOPTER PILOTS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds PRIMO CENTER FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds LIFEWORK DIRECTION ↗
  • Who funds STEPPENWOLF THEATRE COMPANY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community TrustIL19.7× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · Polk Bros Foundation Inc · Arie and Ida Crown Memorial · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Network for Good · Charities Aid Foundation America · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hill Foundation for Families Living with Disabilities funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hill Foundation for Families Living with Disabilities. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Hill Foundation for Families Living with Disabilities?

    Find your warmest path to Hill Foundation for Families Living with Disabilities through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 69 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hill Foundation for Families Living with Disabilities’ filings →

    More from the funding graph