Skip to content
Hill Country Ride for AIDS Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Hill Country Ride for AIDS Inc

To produce an annual HIV/AIDS fundraising event promoting awareness of the disease and raising funds for the nine agencies in Central Texas providing of HIV/AIDS services and prevention efforts.

$338k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$67k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$2.1MHousing & Shelter$778kYouth Development$251kHuman Services$247kCivil Rights$82k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 9 grants below total $326,313, the rows itemized in this filing. The $338,239 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $11,926 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k8 grants · $259k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $67k
$30,560
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Friends of David Powell Clinic$66,853
Vivent Health$47,276
Out Youth Austin$36,982
ALLGO$31,665
Community Action Inc$30,560
ASHWell Clinic$30,461
Project Transitions$30,040
Intergral Care$27,271
Waterloo Counseling Center$25,205
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 10% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Out Youth Austin: $81k → 10%Vivent Health: $76k → 17%Out Youth Austin: $37k → 10%Vivent Health: $35k → 17%Out Youth Austin: $32k → 10%Vivent Health: $29k → 17%ASHWell Clinic: $30k → 10%Vivent Health: $47k → 17%Out Youth Austin: $10k → 10%Out Youth: $50k → 10%Waterloo Counseling Center: $42k → 10%Waterloo Counseling Center: $37k → 10%Waterloo Counseling Center: $29k → 10%Waterloo Counseling Center: $20k → 10%Friends of David Powell Clinic: $19k → 10%Out Youth: $14k → 10%Out Youth: $12k → 10%ASHWell Clinic: $76k → 10%ASHWell Clinic: $33k → 10%ASHWell Clinic: $30k → 10%ASHWell Clinic: $29k → 10%Integral Care: $36k → 10%CARE: $35k → 10%CARE: $32k → 10%ALLGO: $32k → 10%CARE Program: $25k → 10%AIDS Services of Austin: $155k → 10%CARE: $20k → 10%AIDS Services of Austin: $141k → 10%Integral Care: $20k → 10%The Care Communities: $92k → 10%ALLGO: $19k → 10%AIDS Services of Austin: $87k → 10%ALLGO: $18k → 10%Vivent Health: $82k → 10%Intergral Care: $18k → 10%Waterloo Counseling Center: $28k → 10%ALLGO: $14k → 10%ASHwell: $41k → 10%Waterloo Counseling Center: $26k → 10%ALLGO: $12k → 10%Wright House Wellness Center: $37k → 10%Waterloo Counseling Center: $25k → 10%ALLGO: $10k → 10%Wright House Wellness Center: $23k → 10%Waterloo Counseling Center: $16k → 10%ASHwell Clinic: $21k → 10%Waterloo Counseling Center: $15k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.4M · 10 repeat orgs$92k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +84% since the first grant, against -74% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
1

Total granted

$3.4M
$92k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+84%
-74%

Still filing today

90%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PT
    Project Transitions Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $778k · revenue +120%
  • AS
    AIDS SERVICES OF AUSTIN INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $640k · revenue +120%
  • A
    ASHwell
    9× · 2017–2025 · $319k · revenue +257%

Funded once

  • TC
    THE CARE COMMUNITIES
    one grant, 2017 · $92k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Access Care of Coastal Texas Inc

Assistance to individuals with aids by providing hiv services, education,counseling, and referral services, direct financial assistance for transportation, rent, utilities, health insurance, medication, and food and nutrition for people…

—
2
Allies Linked for the Prevention of Hiv and Aids

Provide HIV/STD testing and support for those affected

Health
3
East Texas Cares Resource Center
—
4
Legacy Community Health Services Inc

The mission of legacy community health services is, "driving healthy change in our communities." our vision is, "connecting our communities to health every day, in every way."

Health
5
Positive Health Care Inc

Mission is to provide housing, counseling and support services to hiv infected clients and their families wherein prudent decisions are made for their well being and their communities.

Health
6
Atx Helps

ATX Helps was created to fill gaps in the spectrum of services available to people in Austin who are experiencing homelessness.

Human Services
7
Tpa Network Incorporated

Vision: vivent health envisions an end to the hiv/aids epidemic.mission: to end hiv/aids by providing integratred, personalzied, judgment-free healthcare, social services, and effective prevention strategies.

—
8
Asociacion Puertoriquena De Servicio Y Ayuda Al Paciente Con Sida

To help to improvement of the quality of life of persons living with the VIH/SIDA, his relatives and significant persons across the coordination of critical, social and alternative

Human Services
9
All About Care

All about care provides counseling, emotional, spiritual and charitable support to people with terminal illinesses, especially hiv/aids.

—
10
Aids Project of the East Bay

Aids project of the east bay (apeb) is focused on the prevention of the spread of hiv and supports individuals living with the virus through programs targeted at some of the most vulnerable and marginalized individuals. apeb seeks to…

Health
11
Positive Wellness Alliance

Our programs alleviate suffering, dispel ignorance, and reach out to all members of our community, regardless of race, religion, or gender. We bring together, local, state, and federal programs and our talented staff, dedicated volunteers,…

Health
12
Bexar Area Harm Reduction Coalition

To provide harm reduction without judgement to reduce the negative consequences of drug use and promote wellness.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Care Communities; the most unlike its peers is Allgo. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Project Transitions Inc: $778,303 · OtherProject Transitions IncFRIENDS OF THE DAVID POWELL CLINIC: $425,388 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE DAVID POWELL CLINICASHwell: $319,214 · OtherASHwellWaterloo Counseling Center Inc: $237,837 · OtherWaterloo Counseling Center IncTHE CARE COMMUNITIES: $92,197 · OtherAIDS SERVICES OF AUSTIN INC: $640,224 · HealthAIDS SERVICES OF AUSTIN INCAUSTIN TRAVIS COUNTY MHMR CENTER DBA INTEGRAL CARE: $231,986 · HealthAUSTIN TRAVIS COUNTY MHMR CENTER D…VIVENT HEALTH INC: $188,277 · HealthVIVENT HEALTH INCOut Youth Inc: $250,902 · Youth DevelopmentCOMMUNITY ACTION INC OF CENTRAL TEXAS: $246,976 · Human ServicesALLGO: $81,821 · Civil Rights
Other$1,852,939Health$1,060,487Youth Development$250,902Human Services$246,976Civil Rights$81,821

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetProject Transitions Inc: $778,303 over 9y, 9.4% of budgetAIDS SERVICES OF AUSTIN INC: $640,224 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE DAVID POWELL CLINIC: $425,388 over 9y, 80% of budgetASHwell: $319,214 over 9y, 1.5% of budgetOut Youth Inc: $250,902 over 9y, 3.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION INC OF CENTRAL TEXAS: $246,976 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetWaterloo Counseling Center Inc: $237,837 over 9y, 5.6% of budgetAUSTIN TRAVIS COUNTY MHMR CENTER DBA INTEGRAL CARE: $231,986 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetVIVENT HEALTH INC: $188,277 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CARE COMMUNITIES: $92,197 over 1y, 16% of budgetALLGO: $81,821 over 6y, 5.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Project Transitions Inc ↗
  • Who funds AIDS SERVICES OF AUSTIN INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE DAVID POWELL CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds ASHwell ↗
  • Who funds Out Youth Inc ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION INC OF CENTRAL TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds Waterloo Counseling Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds AUSTIN TRAVIS COUNTY MHMR CENTER DBA INTEGRAL CARE ↗
  • Who funds VIVENT HEALTH INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CARE COMMUNITIES ↗
  • Who funds ALLGO ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Austin Community Foun…St David's FoundationThe Dallas FoundationUnited Way for Greate…The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Austin Community Foundation IncTX23.5× affinity9 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Austin Community Foundation Inc · St David's Foundation · The Dallas Foundation · United Way for Greater Austin · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hill Country Ride for AIDS Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hill Country Ride for AIDS Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Hill Country Ride for AIDS Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Hill Country Ride for AIDS Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hill Country Ride for AIDS’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home