Loading…
· Public charity
Hill Country Ride for AIDS Inc
To produce an annual HIV/AIDS awareness and fundraising event in Central Texas to promote awareness and raise funds for support of HIV/AIDS prevention and services provided by the beneficiary agencies of Hill Country Ride for AIDS.
$338k
Granted FY2025
9
Grants
2
Communities
$67k
Largest
01What you fund
01
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 51% of Hill Country Ride for AIDS Inc’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2019
see statement
2020
see statement
2021
see part
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2025 · 9 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k8 grants · $259k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $67k
$30,560
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
- Friends of David Powell Clinic$66,853
- Vivent Health$47,276
- Out Youth Austin$36,982
- ALLGO$31,665
- Community Action Inc$30,560
- ASHWell Clinic$30,461
- Project Transitions$30,040
- Intergral Care$27,271
- Waterloo Counseling Center$25,205
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 12%. 11% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.8M · 10 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else
10 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
10
0
Total granted
$2.8M
$0
Still filing today
90%
0%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
HealthYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesCivil RightsOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PTProject Transitions7× · 2018–2025 · $652k · revenue +120%
- Aallgo6× · 2018–2023 · $534k · revenue +50%
- WHWright House Wellness Center7× · 2018–2025 · $267k · revenue +257%
Funded once
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
The Aids Institute Inc
The mission of The AIDS Institute is to promote action for social change through public policy, research, advocacy, and education.
Unclassified
2
Pride Center San Antonio
The mission of The Center- Pride Center San Antonio is to serve the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and HIV communities by connecting them and their families to community resources and organizations related to health, wellness,…
Human Services
3
Aids Foundation Houston Inc
Aih's mission is to end the hiv epidemic in the greater houston area.
Health
4
Positive Wellness Alliance
To provide services and support to people infected with and affected by HIV/AIDs through medical case management, housing, outreach, and preventative education.
Health
5
Access Care of Coastal Texas Inc
Assistance to individuals with aids by providing hiv services, education,counseling, and referral services, direct financial assistance for transportation, rent, utilities, health insurance, medication, and food and nutrition for people…
—
6
Action Wellness
Provide broad range of services to people in philadelphia infected and affected by the hiv disease and other chronic illnesses.
Health
7
Hiv Alliance
Supporting individuals living with hiv/aids and preventing new hiv infections.
—
8
Valley Aids Council
VAC is a non-profit HIV service organization that delivers culturally appropriate sexual health and wellness services in South Texas and advocates for the Latinx population at the local, state and national level.
Health
9
Wellness Aids Services Inc
Provide education, support services, and prevention services for persons living with and at risk for hiv/aids.
Health
10
Hiv Resource Consortium Inc
Delivering wrap around programs and services to those living with chronic health conditions.
Health
11
Partnership to End Aids Status Inc
Maximize equlity in trans community
Education
12
The Philadelphia Center
Empower those living with hiv, eliminate new hiv transmissions, and enhance community wellness.
—
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Aids Services of Austin Inc and the most unlike its peers is Waterloo Counseling Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
10 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$1,427,112Health$881,546Youth Development$210,899Human Services$201,245Civil Rights$74,219
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Austin Community Foundation IncTX21.8× affinity8 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Austin Community Foundation Inc · St David's Foundation · The Dallas Foundation · United Way for Greater Austin · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation Hill Country Ride for AIDS Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Friends of David Powell Clinic.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~146 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 2 filed years.
Track record & reputation
medium risk
2 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +73% since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 742696727 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on Friends of David Powell Clinic, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 146 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 80% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Hill Country Ride for AIDS Inc?
Find your warmest path to Hill Country Ride for AIDS Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines