· Public charity
Hill Country Ride for AIDS Inc
To produce an annual HIV/AIDS fundraising event promoting awareness of the disease and raising funds for the nine agencies in Central Texas providing of HIV/AIDS services and prevention efforts.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 9 grants below total $326,313 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $338,239 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $11,926 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k8 grants · $259k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $67k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Friends of David Powell Clinic | $66,853 |
| Vivent Health | $47,276 |
| Out Youth Austin | $36,982 |
| ALLGO | $31,665 |
| Community Action Inc | $30,560 |
| ASHWell Clinic | $30,461 |
| Project Transitions | $30,040 |
| Intergral Care | $27,271 |
| Waterloo Counseling Center | $25,205 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 10% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +84% since the first grant, against -74% for the ones you funded once.
10 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PTProject Transitions Inc9× · 2017–2025 · $778k · revenue +120%
- ASAIDS SERVICES OF AUSTIN INC8× · 2017–2024 · $640k · revenue +120%
- AASHwell9× · 2017–2025 · $319k · revenue +257%
Funded once
- TCTHE CARE COMMUNITIESone grant, 2017 · $92k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Assistance to individuals with aids by providing hiv services, education,counseling, and referral services, direct financial assistance for transportation, rent, utilities, health insurance, medication, and food and nutrition for people…
Provide HIV/STD testing and support for those affected
Mission is to provide housing, counseling and support services to hiv infected clients and their families wherein prudent decisions are made for their well being and their communities.
Vision: vivent health envisions an end to the hiv/aids epidemic.mission: to end hiv/aids by providing integratred, personalzied, judgment-free healthcare, social services, and effective prevention strategies.
Our programs alleviate suffering, dispel ignorance, and reach out to all members of our community, regardless of race, religion, or gender. We bring together, local, state, and federal programs and our talented staff, dedicated volunteers,…
The mission of legacy community health services is, "driving healthy change in our communities." our vision is, "connecting our communities to health every day, in every way."
ATX Helps was created to fill gaps in the spectrum of services available to people in Austin who are experiencing homelessness.
All about care provides counseling, emotional, spiritual and charitable support to people with terminal illinesses, especially hiv/aids.
To help to improvement of the quality of life of persons living with the VIH/SIDA, his relatives and significant persons across the coordination of critical, social and alternative
Texas health action (tha) is a community-informed 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization dedicated to providing access to culturally affirming, quality health services in a safe and supportive environment with an expertise in serving lgbtqia+…
Apo provides medical and social services to the community, with emphasis on underserved populations.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Care Communities and the most unlike its peers is Allgo. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Project Transitions Inc ↗
- Who funds AIDS SERVICES OF AUSTIN INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE DAVID POWELL CLINIC ↗
- Who funds ASHwell ↗
- Who funds Out Youth Inc ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION INC OF CENTRAL TEXAS ↗
- Who funds Waterloo Counseling Center Inc ↗
- Who funds AUSTIN TRAVIS COUNTY MHMR CENTER DBA INTEGRAL CARE ↗
- Who funds VIVENT HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds THE CARE COMMUNITIES ↗
- Who funds ALLGO ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Austin Community Foundation Inc · St David's Foundation · The Dallas Foundation · United Way for Greater Austin · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Hill Country Ride for AIDS Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Hill Country Ride for AIDS Inc?
Find your warmest path to Hill Country Ride for AIDS Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.