Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Create Healthy Management

Create Healthy is on a mission for health and wellness in our community; Investing in wellness, empowering communities .

$5.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
44
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$1.6M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.

Human Services$3.8MRecreation & Sports$1.8MHealth$916kEducation$597kFood & Nutrition$445kYouth Development$211kHousing & Shelter$35kReligion$34kOther$0
02FY2024 · 44 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k19 grants · $406k
  • $50k–250k19 grants · $1.7M
  • $250k+4 grants · $3.2M
$50,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$176M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Bethany Lutheran Church Preschool$1,600,000
Little Hearts Child Development Center$771,786
Fredericksburg Community Health Ctr$545,000
Fredericksburg Independent School District$294,000
Hill Country Community MHMR Center$195,269
Texas Wine Auction Foundation$175,000
Mason United Methodist Church$129,324
Fredericksburg Academic Boosters Inc$126,700
The Grace Center of Fredericksburg$122,500
Blanco Independent School District$102,000
Comfort Independent School District$95,000
Caritas Family Assistance Network Inc$84,000
Boys & Girls Club Of The Highland Lake$80,000
Llano Independent School District$80,000
St Mary's Catholic School$75,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $1.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Undue Medical Debt: $6k → 13%Comfort Golden Age Center Foundation: $20k → 7%Little Hearts Child Development Center: $772k → 10%LITTLE HEARTS CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $500k → 10%The Grace Center of Fredericksburg: $123k → 10%Caritas Family Assistance Network Inc: $84k → 10%Gillespie County Committee On Aging: $50k → 10%GRACE CENTER OF FREDERICKSBURG: $35k → 10%COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER OF TEXAS: $25k → 10%GOLDEN HUB COMMUNITY CENTER: $25k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$5.1M · 9 repeat orgs$2.8M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +14% since the first grant, against -12% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 34 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
7

Total granted

$5.1M
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
-12%

Still filing today

78%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.7M went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FC
    Fredericksburg Community Health Center
    5× · 2018–2024 · $692k · revenue +229% · 26% of their budget
  • TW
    TEXAS WINE AUCTION FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $250k · revenue +119% · 49% of their budget
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE TEXAS HILL COUNTRY
    2× · 2023–2024 · $131k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • FF
    FBG FRIENDS OF THE FIELDS
    one grant, 2023 · $900k
  • TT
    THE TEXAS HILL COUNTRY HIGHER EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $75k · revenue -29737%
  • GC
    GILLESPIE COUNTY FAIR & FESTIVALS ASSOCIATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +20%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Texas Food & Fuel Association Scholarship Foundation

The texas food & fuel association scholarship foundation awards scholarships to outstanding students in the state of texas.

Education
2
Texas a&M University-Central Tx Foundati

Operated exclusively for educational purposes specifically including to further educational activities at texas a& m university-central texas within the meaning of 501(c)(3).

Education
3
Fort Bend County Fair Scholarship Foundation

Youth education is a primary focus of the Fort Bend County Fair activities. The Scholarship Foundation is the custodian of scholarship funds and administers those funds to recipients designated by the Fort Bend County Fair Association.

Philanthropy
4
Farmersville Education Foundation Inc
—
5
Frisco Education Foundation

To provide scholarships to graduating high school students in the Frisco Independent School District. The Foundation also supports educational programs and educators in the District through Grants for Great Ideas.

Philanthropy
6
Food Pantry of Jeff Davis County Inc

None

Food & Nutrition
7
Texas Farm Bureau Ag Research & Education Foundation

Initiate ag research and educational activities, disseminate information regarding education and marketing commodities. promote study of agriculture and agriculture research, and award educational scholarships and agricultural research…

Education
8
Greater Texas Foundation
Education
9
High Cotton Relief Fund

The mission of high cotton relief fund is to benefit and support farmers and farming communities in and around west texas who are going through tough financial difficulties.

Food & Nutrition
10
Texas Floral Endowment

Charitable educational endowment for promoting floriculture

Community Improvement
11
Texas Higher Education Foundation

The mission of the texas higher education foundation is to increase participation and success in higher education for all texans. the foundation is a support organization for the texas higher education coordinating board. it exists to…

Education
12
Frisco Chamber Foundation

The frisco chamber foundation is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization that complements the work of the frisco chamber of commerce by building community strength through partnerships, programs, and education.

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Community Foundation of the Texas Hill Country Inc and the most unlike its peers is Blanco Education Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 20 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%20%<5yr14%10%5–10yr26%20%10–20yr16%27%20–35yr12%20%35–55yr11%5%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%37%<5yr14%4%5–10yr26%3%10–20yr16%20%20–35yr12%6%35–55yr11%31%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 20% of your grantees by number, and just 37% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/50
the rest of the field
9%
113/1,192

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
35/35
Grantees still filing
11/35
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BETHANY LUTHERAN CHURCH — $2,100,000 · OtherBETHANY LUTHERAN CHURCHFREDERICKSBURG INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT — $309,000 · OtherFREDERICKSBURG INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICTHILL COUNTRY COMMUNITY MHMR CENTER — $195,269 · OtherHILL COUNTRY COMMUNITY MHMR CENTERMASON UNITED METHODIST CHURCH — $129,324 · Other+19 more — $893,570 · Other+19 moreLITTLE HEARTS CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER — $1,271,786 · Human ServicesLITTLE HEARTS CHILD DEV…THE GRACE CENTER — $157,500 · Human ServicesTHE GRACE CENTERCARITAS FAMILY ASSISTANCE NETWORK INC — $84,000 · Human Services+5 more — $126,200 · Human Services+5 moreFBG FRIENDS OF THE FIELDS — $900,000 · Recreation & SportsFBG FRIENDS O…GILLESPIE COUNTY FAIR & FESTIVALS ASSOCIATION INC — $50,000 · Recreation & SportsFredericksburg Community Health Center — $692,350 · HealthFredericks…+1 more — $11,801 · HealthFREDERICKSBURG ACADEMIC BOOSTERS INC — $126,700 · EducationFREDERICKSBURG ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $76,616 · EducationTHE TEXAS HILL COUNTRY HIGHER EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION — $75,000 · EducationBlanco Education Foundation — $34,200 · EducationHARPER ISD PARENT TEACHER ORG INC — $25,400 · EducationJOHNSON CITY COMMUNITY EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $23,800 · EducationMASON ISD SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION — $22,900 · EducationTHE HERITAGE FAMILY SCHOOL — $22,000 · EducationAMBLESIDE SCHOOLS INTERNATIONAL — $17,000 · EducationFREDERICKSBURG BILLIE BOOSTERS INC — $15,000 · Education+1 more — $10,000 · EducationTEXAS WINE AUCTION FOUNDATION — $250,000 · Food & NutritionCentral Texas Food Bank Inc — $25,000 · Food & NutritionHILL COUNTRY DAILY BREAD — $25,000 · Food & NutritionBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE TEXAS HILL COUNTRY — $131,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE HIGHLAND LAKES INC — $80,000 · Youth Development
Other$3,627,163Human Services$1,639,486Recreation & Sports$950,000Health$704,151Education$448,616Food & Nutrition$300,000Youth Development$211,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFredericksburg Community Health Center — $692,350 over 5y, 26% of budgetTEXAS WINE AUCTION FOUNDATION — $250,000 over 2y, 49% of budgetTHE GRACE CENTER — $157,500 over 2y, 9.3% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE TEXAS HILL COUNTRY — $131,000 over 2y, 6.2% of budgetCARITAS FAMILY ASSISTANCE NETWORK INC — $84,000 over 1y, 59% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE HIGHLAND LAKES INC — $80,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetHILL COUNTRY COMMUNITY NEEDS COUNCIL — $78,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetFREDERICKSBURG ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $76,616 over 2y, 8.2% of budgetSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGILLESPIE COUNTY COMMITTEE ON AGING iNC — $50,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetGILLESPIE COUNTY FAIR & FESTIVALS ASSOCIATION INC — $50,000 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetHARPER ISD PARENT TEACHER ORG INC — $25,400 over 1y, 60% of budgetCOMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTERS OF TEXAS INC — $25,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetCentral Texas Food Bank Inc — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE TEXAS HILL COUNTRY INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHILL COUNTRY DAILY BREAD — $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE GOLDEN HUB SENIOR CENTER FOUNDATION OF FREDERICKSBURG — $25,000 over 1y, 67% of budgetJOHNSON CITY COMMUNITY EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $23,800 over 1y, 40% of budgetMASON ISD SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION — $22,900 over 1y, 7.6% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FAMILY SCHOOL — $22,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetComfort Golden Age Center Foundation — $20,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetFREDERICKSBURG ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION INC — $19,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetAMBLESIDE SCHOOLS INTERNATIONAL — $17,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetFREDERICKSBURG BILLIE BOOSTERS INC — $15,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetHILL COUNTRY CASA INC — $15,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetNAMI Texas Inc — $11,801 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE WRITTEN WORD INC — $10,000 over 1y, 24% of budgetLights Spectacular Hill Country Style Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetTEXAS RAMP PROJECT — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC — $6,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundat…Dian Graves Owen Foun…Hal & Charlie Peterso…Adam R Scripps Founda…San Antonio Area Foun…Fredericksburg Social…The Robert P and Mari…Miramar Charitable Fo…Perry & Ruby Stevens …Methodist Healthcare …Bethany Lutheran Foun…Kathryn Nell Harrison…
The Community Foundation of the Texas Hill Country IncTX38.3× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of the Texas Hill Country Inc · Dian Graves Owen Foundation · Hal & Charlie Peterson Foundation & Fd Mgmt Trust · Adam R Scripps Foundation · San Antonio Area Foundation · Fredericksburg Social Turn Verein · The Robert P and Mariana R Scripps Family Foundation Inc · Miramar Charitable Foundation · Perry & Ruby Stevens Charitable Foundation · Methodist Healthcare Ministries of South Texas Inc · Bethany Lutheran Foundation of Fredericksburg Texas Inc · Kathryn Nell Harrison Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Create Healthy Management funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines