Skip to content

· Private foundation

Higher Rock Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$539k
Granted FY2025still arriving
29
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$78k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

International$642kHuman Services$147kReligion$136kHealth$68kScience & Tech$20kHousing & Shelter$10kCommunity Improvement$10kEmployment$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 29 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $44k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $308k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $188k
$10,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$105k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Operation Mobilization - General$77,500
Sedera - Jesus Family Kingdom$60,030
Justice Rising International$50,000
Care of Children$45,000
Acres of Love$45,000
AsOne$40,000
Project CURE$33,270
Harbor Point Church$28,336
AIRO$24,000
Riverbank Organization$21,600
Healing At the Well$10,300
UNIDOS South OC$10,000
i5 Freedom Network$10,000
Discovery Cube orange County$10,000
Plant With Purpose$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 87% of grant dollars ($906k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 13% that went abroad ($135k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $144k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 7% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Peace House Inc: $8k → 5%Peace House Inc: $2k → 5%Laura's House: $840 → 10%i5 Freedom Network: $10k → 11%Align International: $2k → 10%Acres of Love: $45k → 10%Acres of Love: $45k → 10%Riverbank Organization: $22k → 10%Riverbank Organization: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
WY
SD
CA
UT
CO
KS
AR
DC
GA
TX

Beyond the US: 13% of all-years giving ($135k)

2 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Madagascar$135k · 2 grants
Tanzania$400 · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 13% of Higher Rock Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 43% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 31%.

Higher Rock Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 26% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$772k · 17 repeat orgs$264k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +3% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
15

Total granted

$772k
$115k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%
0%

Still filing today

53%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $149k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthReligionInternationalEducationHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • A
    AIRO
    3× · 2023–2025 · $36k · revenue +3%
  • FU
    FLORESTA USA INCORPORATED
    3× · 2023–2025 · $34k · revenue +280%
  • LH
    Logos Healing Institute
    2× · 2024–2025 · $17k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • JF
    Jesus Family Kingdom
    one grant, 2024 · $75k
  • PB
    Peanut Butter Jesus
    one grant, 2024 · $20k
  • OC
    Orange County Rescue Mission Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue -7%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Aerial Recovery

Aerial recovery's mission is to save lives and stop evil. through the creation and deployment of humanitarian special operators, aerial recovery brings together selected veterans, first responders, and mission-qualified civilians who,…

—
2
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals

To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.

International
3
Covenant House New Orleans

Covenant house new orleans (the organization) is a not-for-profit organization affiliated with 34 similar organizations across five countries, all of which are affiliates of covenant house international (parent affiliate) and share a…

Human Services
4
City Rescue Mission Inc

Our mission is to lead our community by serving people experiencing or at risk of homelessness with help, hope, and healing, in the spirit of excellence, under the call of christ.

Human Services
5
Journey to Destiny Ministries

Journey To Destiny Ministries (JTDM) is a global, faith-based nonprofit organization committed to transforming and restoring dignity, hope, and opportunity to vulnerable individualsespecially children, women, and families affected by…

Religion
6
Bridging Initiatives International

Provide holistic and integrated service that address the diverse needs of vulnerable individuals and families experiencing instability as the result of domestic violence and /or homelessness.

Human Services
7
Covenant House Georgia Inc

Covenant house georgia provides shelters, protects and advocates on behalf of homeless, trafficked, runaway and sexually exploited youth.

—
8
Interval House

The mission of the organization is to ensure safety and stability for people who are battered, abused, homeless or at risk; to create public awareness about the epidemic of violence; and to mobilize the community to prevent violence and…

Human Services
9
Real Love Ministries International

RLMI is organized exclusively for charitable purposes. Our Mission is to minister to the Haitian people beginning in the village of Laffiteau seeking to share the love of Jesus with each individual and discipling those who know Jesus as…

Religion
10
Church World Service Inc

Church world service, inc. is a private, voluntary faith-based organization with 37 member communions that transformscommunities around the globe through just and sustainable responses to hunger, poverty, displacement and disaster.

International
11
Village Mission
Human Services
12
Free Rain International Inc

Free Rain provides resources and empowering, educational programs to aid those enslaved, impoverished, and exploited. Our vision is to create options and opportunities for those rescued and oppressed in order to make positive and radical…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Assistance Ministries; the most unlike its peers is Wylde Horses Therapeutic Riding Facility. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
10/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Operation Mobilization - General: $175,943 · OtherOperation Mobilization - GeneralCare of Children: $80,907 · OtherCare of ChildrenJesus Family Kingdom: $75,038 · OtherJesus Family KingdomSedera - Jesus Family Kingdom: $60,030 · OtherSedera - Jesus Family KingdomAsOne: $60,000 · OtherAsOneHARBOR POINT CHURCH: $47,935 · OtherHARBOR POINT CHURCH+20 more: $116,965 · Other+20 moreACRES OF LOVE: $90,000 · Human ServicesACRES OF LOVETHE RIVERBANK ORGANIZATION: $31,600 · Human ServicesTHE RIVERBANK OR…UNIDOS South OC Inc: $10,000 · Human ServicesUNIDOS South OC …I-5 FREEDOM NETWORK: $10,000 · Human ServicesI-5 FREEDOM NETW…Peace House Inc: $9,450 · Human ServicesPeace House Inc+2 more: $2,490 · Human ServicesJUSTICE RISING INTERNATIONAL: $100,000 · EducationJUSTICE RI…AIRO: $36,343 · ReligionLEGACY RELIEF PROJECT: $32,464 · ReligionBENEVOLENT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $33,270 · HealthLogos Healing Institute: $16,582 · Health+2 more: $1,008 · HealthFLORESTA USA INCORPORATED: $33,645 · InternationalTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $5,000 · International+1 more: $1,320 · InternationalOrange County Rescue Mission Inc: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterFAMILY ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES: $1,000 · Philanthropy
Other$616,818Human Services$153,540Education$100,000Religion$68,807Health$50,860International$39,965Housing & Shelter$10,000Philanthropy$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJUSTICE RISING INTERNATIONAL: $100,000 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetACRES OF LOVE: $90,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetAIRO: $36,343 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetFLORESTA USA INCORPORATED: $33,645 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBENEVOLENT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $33,270 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEGACY RELIEF PROJECT: $32,464 over 2y, 9.8% of budgetTHE RIVERBANK ORGANIZATION: $31,600 over 2y, 5.7% of budgetLogos Healing Institute: $16,582 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetOrange County Rescue Mission Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIDOS South OC Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetI-5 FREEDOM NETWORK: $10,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetPeace House Inc: $9,450 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAlign Ministries DBA Align International: $1,650 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetONE ATTA TIME INC: $1,320 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAX S LOVE PROJECT INC: $258 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JUSTICE RISING INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds ACRES OF LOVE ↗
  • Who funds AIRO ↗
  • Who funds FLORESTA USA INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds BENEVOLENT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LEGACY RELIEF PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds THE RIVERBANK ORGANIZATION ↗
  • Who funds Logos Healing Institute ↗
  • Who funds Orange County Rescue Mission Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNIDOS South OC Inc ↗
  • Who funds I-5 FREEDOM NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds Peace House Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds Align Ministries DBA Align International ↗
  • Who funds ONE ATTA TIME INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds LAURA'S HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds WYLDE HORSES THERAPEUTIC RIDING FACILITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Optivest FoundationCA20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Optivest Foundation · RightSpace Storage Foundation · Orange County Community Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Network for Good · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Higher Rock Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Higher Rock Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Higher Rock Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Higher Rock Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Higher Rock’s filings →

    More from the funding graph