· Private foundation
Heyday Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k28 grants · $78k
- $10k–50k14 grants · $270k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $471k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE MIAMI FOUNDATION INC | $110,000 |
| PEN AMERICAN CENTER INC | $100,000 |
| MERIDIAN INTERNATIONAL CENTER | $80,000 |
| BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE | $75,000 |
| BROOKLYN MUSEUM OF ART | $56,000 |
| STUDIO MUSEUM OF HARLEM | $50,000 |
| AMERICAN THEATRE WING INC | $25,000 |
| CENTER FOR AMERICAN PROGRESS | $25,000 |
| TIDES FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| THE HARVARD CORPORATION | $25,000 |
| HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN INC | $25,000 |
| PLAYWRIGHTS HORIZONS INC | $25,000 |
| COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS INC | $25,000 |
| THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC | $20,000 |
| MARCH ON WASHINGTON FILM FESTIVAL | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–23, $19k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 32% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +12% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.
68 repeat relationships — 31 still active in FY2024, 37 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $49k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MIMERIDIAN INTERNATIONAL CENTER7× · 2018–2024 · $244k · revenue +30%
- PAPEN AMERICAN CENTER INC4× · 2020–2024 · $163k · revenue +7%
- LVLGBTQ Victory Institute Inc5× · 2019–2023 · $150k · revenue +70%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2018 · $60k
SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTIONone grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +8%- FFAIRVOTEgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +54%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The manhattan institute is a community of scholars, journalists, activists, and civic leaders dedicated to advancing opportunity, individual liberty, and the rule of law in america and its great cities.
The mission of the organization is to foster the development of creative individuals as writers and artists and to promote public appreciation of excellence in the literary and graphic arts by publishing a magazine containing fiction,…
The peterson institute for international economics (piie) is an independent nonprofit, nonpartisan research organization dedicated to strengthening prosperity and human welfare in the global economy through expert analysis and practical…
New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…
The Knight First Amendment Institute defends the freedoms of speech and the press in the digital age through strategic litigation, research, public advocacy and public education. Our aim is to promote a system of free expression that is…
Wp theater is the nation's oldest and largest theater company dedicated to developing, producing, and promoting the work of women+ at every stage of their careers. for over four decades we have served as leaders of a global movement…
The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.
To create a nation where everyone enjoys a fair share of our collective prosperity.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New York Foundation for the Arts Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Matthew Harris Ornstein Memorial Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
138 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 138 of the 166 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NATIONAL REDISTRICTING FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE MIAMI FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE NEW YORK COMMUNITY TRUST ↗
- Who funds MERIDIAN INTERNATIONAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR AMERICAN PROGRESS ↗
- Who funds WILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC ↗
- Who funds THE STUDIO MUSEUM IN HARLEM ↗
- Who funds PEN AMERICAN CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN THEATRE WING INC ↗
- Who funds LGBTQ Victory Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS INC ↗
- Who funds THE CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN INC ↗
- Who funds DEMOCRACY WORKS INC ↗
- Who funds PLAYWRIGHTS HORIZONS INC ↗
- Who funds MARCH ON WASHINGTON FILM FESTIVAL ↗
- Who funds JOHN F KENNEDY CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS ↗
- Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
- Who funds New York University ↗
- Who funds ALI FORNEY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Center on Budget and Policy Priorities ↗
- Who funds American Friends of Israel Philharmonic Orchestra ↗
- Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
- Who funds TIDES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds GLIMMERGLASS OPERA THEATRE INC ↗
- Who funds THE ECONOMIC CLUB OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds THE BROOKLYN INSTITUTE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES ↗
- Who funds EQUALITY FLORIDA INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK CITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds The Economic Club of Washington DC ↗
- Who funds MUSEUM OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds Center for US Global Leadership ↗
- Who funds SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The Ford Foundation · The New York Community Trust · Jewish Communal Fund · The Rockefeller Foundation · The Andrew W Mellon Foundation · Arison Arts Foundation · The Horace W Goldsmith Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Lily Auchincloss Foundation Inc · Cornelia T Bailey Charitable Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Heyday Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Medstar Health Research Institute Inc — 25% of income from government
- Dr Martin Luther King Scholarship Fund — 8% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- The Center for Independent Documentary Inc — 6% of income from government
- Eugene O'neill Memorial Theater Center Inc — 1% of income from government
- Bruce Museum Inc — 0% of income from government
- New World Symphony Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Heyday Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Heyday Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.