Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Herschel H and Cornelia N Everett Foundation C/O Piedmont Trust Company

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$211k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$62k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 43% of HERSCHEL H AND CORNELIA N EVERETT FOUNDATION C/O PIEDMONT TRUST COMPANY’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $136k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $62k
$20,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$4.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
QUEENS UNIVERSITY OF CHARLOTTE$62,009
FOUNDATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE$45,000
BROOKSTONE SCHOOLS OF MECKLENBURG COUNTY$25,000
GORDON CONWELL THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY INC$24,000
UNION PRESBYTERIAN SEMINARY$20,000
BELOVED ASHVILLE$11,003
IMPACT ABUSE PREVENTION SERVICES$11,003
ALLEGRO ORGANIZATIONAL SOLUTIONS INC$9,003
COVENANT COLLEGE$2,000
PRESBYTERIAN HOMES AT CHARLOTTE INC$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $45k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE RELATIVES INC: $10k → 7%SAFE ALLIANCE: $3k → 10%CRISIS ASSISTANCE MINISTRY: $10k → 10%THE RELATIVES INC: $10k → 10%PRESBYTERIAN HOME AT CHARLOTEE INC: $2k → 10%PRESBYTERIAN HOME AT CHARLOTTE INC: $2k → 10%PRESBYTERIAN HOME AT CHARLOTTE INC: $2k → 10%PRESBYTERIAN HOME AT CHARLOTTE INC: $2k → 10%PRESBYTERIAN HOME AT CHARLOTTE INC: $2k → 10%PRESBYTERIAN HOMES AT CHARLOTTE INC: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 5% of Herschel H and Cornelia N Everett Foundation C/O Piedmont Trust Company’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 86% of the giving stays in NC; read by stated purpose it is 81% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Herschel H and Cornelia N Everett Foundation C/O Piedmont Trust Companylessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$797k · 10 repeat orgs$176k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
13

Total granted

$797k
$143k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
0%

Still filing today

90%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $33k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    FOUNDATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE
    5× · 2021–2025 · $159k · revenue +79%
  • BS
    Brookstone Schools of Mecklenburg County
    5× · 2021–2025 · $115k · revenue +57%
  • GT
    Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary Inc
    4× · 2021–2025 · $94k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE
    one grant, 2020 · $39k
  • BS
    BROOKSTONE SCHOOL OF MECKLENBURG
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
  • BB
    BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF
    one grant, 2020 · $15k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
For Charlotte Inc

To unite the Church to transform the city through the power of the Gospel.

Religion
2
Charlotte Christian College & Theological Seminary

To educate, train, and develop ministers, evangelists, missionaries, and other people who are going to enter the Christian ministry. Educate ministers and missionaries to serve the Lord.

Religion
3
Covenant HomeCare

Covenant HomeCare provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of the patient's ability to pay.

Health
4
Regent University

Regent University serves as a center of Christian thought and action to provide excellent education through a Biblical perspective and global context equipping Christian leaders to change the world.

5
Coastal Carolinas Health Alliance

Facilitate networking among hospitals

Health
6
Charlotte Family Housing

The mission of Charlotte Family Housing is to empower working families experiencing homelessness to achieve long-term self-sufficiency through shelter, housing, supportive services, and advocacy.

Human Services
7
Greenville College

Greenville college d/b/a greenville university empowers students for lives of character and service through a transforming christ-centered education in the liberal arts, sciences, and professional studies.

Education
8
Charlotte Christian School

Charlotte christian school is a christ-centered, college preparatory school, equipping and developing students to effectively integrate biblical truth and learning nto their daily lives and to impact the culture for christ.

9
Spartanburg Methodist College

SMC Delivers an exceptional education that fuses the empowerment of the liberal arts with crucial career skills. Our mission is to equip our students with the knowledge, skills, virtues, and mindset needed to thrive personally, create…

Education
10
Presbyterian Homes of Charlotte Inc

Low-rent government assisted housing for the elderly.

11
Charlotte Regional Realtor Association Inc

The charlotte regional realtor (r) association (crra) is a trade association serving members in mecklenburg, iredell and haywood counties. at december 31, 2024, crra had 14,020 members.

12
Erskine College and Theological Seminary

Erskine College exists to glorify God as a Christian academic community where students are equipped to flourish as whole persons for lives of service through the pursuit of undergraduate liberal arts and graduate theological education.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Charlotte Rescue Mission and the most unlike its peers is Allegro Organizational Solutions Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FOUNDATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE — $158,600 · OtherFOUNDATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA A…UNION PRESBYTERIAN SEMINARY — $136,000 · OtherUNION PRESBYTERIAN SEMINARYUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE — $38,600 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTEBROOKSTONE SCHOOL OF MECKLENBURG — $25,000 · OtherBROOKSTONE SCHOOL OF MECKLENBURGBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF — $15,000 · Other+7 more — $43,806 · Other+7 moreQueens University of Charlotte — $201,009 · EducationQueens University of CharlotteBrookstone Schools of Mecklenburg County — $115,000 · EducationBrookstone Schools of Mecklenburg CountyGordon-Conwell Theological Seminary Inc — $94,000 · EducationGordon-Conwell Theological Seminary Inc+1 more — $2,000 · EducationATRIUM HEALTH FOUNDATION — $20,000 · HealthCHARLOTTE RESCUE MISSION — $20,000 · HealthPats Place Child Advocacy Center — $10,000 · HealthTHE RELATIVES INC — $20,000 · Human ServicesTHE PRESBYTERIAN HOME AT CHARLOTTE INC — $12,000 · Human ServicesCrisis Assistance Ministry — $10,000 · Human ServicesSafe Alliance Inc — $3,000 · Human ServicesUrbanPromise Charlotte — $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentBig Brothers Big Sisters of Central Carolinas — $14,500 · Youth DevelopmentBELOVED ASHEVILLE — $11,003 · Housing & ShelterALLEGRO ORGANIZATIONAL SOLUTIONS INC — $3,000 · International
Other$417,006Education$412,009Health$50,000Human Services$45,000Youth Development$34,500Housing & Shelter$11,003International$3,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetQueens University of Charlotte — $201,009 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE — $158,600 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBrookstone Schools of Mecklenburg County — $115,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetGordon-Conwell Theological Seminary Inc — $94,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetUrbanPromise Charlotte — $20,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetATRIUM HEALTH FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE RELATIVES INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCHARLOTTE RESCUE MISSION — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBig Brothers Big Sisters of Central Carolinas — $14,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE PRESBYTERIAN HOME AT CHARLOTTE INC — $12,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPats Place Child Advocacy Center — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCrisis Assistance Ministry — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALLEGRO ORGANIZATIONAL SOLUTIONS INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSafe Alliance Inc — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT COLLEGE — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Foundation for the CarolinasNC22.6× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Foundation for the Carolinas · Duke Energy Foundation · The Leon Levine Foundation · United Way of Greater Charlotte Inc · United Way Worldwide · The Presbyterian Hospital · Speedway Children's Charities · Albemarle Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Winston-Salem Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Herschel H and Cornelia N Everett Foundation C/O Piedmont Trust Company funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Herschel H and Cornelia N Everett Foundation C/O Piedmont Trust Company?

    Find your warmest path to Herschel H and Cornelia N Everett Foundation C/O Piedmont Trust Company through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph