· Private foundation
Herbert Feinberg Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k4 grants · $15k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $116k
- $50k–250k7 grants · $699k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ALLEN-STEVENSON SCHOOL | $175,000 |
| FIDELITY CHARITABLE | $166,000 |
| HUNTERS CMT4B3 RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC | $100,000 |
| JOAN & SANFORD I WEILL MEDICAL COLLEGE | $91,000 |
| AMERICAS VETDOGS | $66,000 |
| CHILDRENS BRAIN TUMOR PROJECT | $51,000 |
| THE SATO PROJECT INC | $50,000 |
| AUGUST WEST FOUNDATION FOR | $25,000 |
| NOW I AM KNOWN FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| ARM SANCTUARY INC | $25,000 |
| RISING STARR HORSE RESCUE | $16,000 |
| BIGGER THAN INC | $15,000 |
| FUREVER BULLY LOVE RESCUE | $10,000 |
| ROBINHOOD FOUNDATION | $8,000 |
| RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE NEW YORK | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $91k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 73% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
10 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $282k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- 1H13 HANDS EQUINE RESCUE INC2× · 2022–2023 · $200k · revenue +79%
- HCHUNTERS CMT4B3 RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC2× · 2023–2025 · $150k · revenue +50%
- RMRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF NEW YORK INC2× · 2023–2025 · $20k · revenue +24%
Funded once
- PPPOLY PREP COUNTRY DAY SCHOOLone grant, 2022 · $1.0M · revenue +15%
- PEPARK EAST SYNAGOGUEone grant, 2023 · $250k
- ADALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $200k · revenue +50%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Dog rescue and care nurturing finding a home
Rescue animals
The Organization's mission is to rescue dogs from high-kill animal shelters and place them in loving forever homes. All dogs rescued are given necessary medical care prior to adoption, including required vaccinations. Dogs are placed in…
Dog rescue
Animal care and rescue
Animal rescue
Rescue animals from shelter
To rescue at risk k-9s from asia.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Guardians of Florida Animal Rescue Inc and the most unlike its peers is Now I am Known Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 14 years old; the field is 18. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 61 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds POLY PREP COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds 13 HANDS EQUINE RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds JOSLIN DIABETES CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds THE ALLEN-STEVENSON SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ↗
- Who funds HUNTERS CMT4B3 RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds GROUP FOR THE EAST END INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICA'S VETDOGS THE VETERANS K-9 CORPS INC ↗
- Who funds The Art Students League Of New York Inc ↗
- Who funds THE SATO PROJECT ↗
- Who funds SOPHIE'S CIRCLE INC ↗
- Who funds FUREVER BULLY LOVE RESCUE ↗
- Who funds SOLUTIONS NOW FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BULLIES N BEYOND INC ↗
- Who funds CHALLENGED ATHLETES INC ↗
- Who funds Now I am Known Foundation ↗
- Who funds ARM SANCTUARY INC ↗
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds DOBERMAN RESCUE LEAGUE INC ↗
- Who funds RISING STARR HORSE RESCUE CORP ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Leslie L Alexander Foundation Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Herbert Feinberg Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Joslin Diabetes Center Inc — 35% of income from government
- Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Herbert Feinberg Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Herbert Feinberg Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.