Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Herbalife Family Foundation

The HERBALIFE FAMILY FOUNDATION's mission is to improve the lives of children and communities around the world.

$5.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
31
Grants FY2024still arriving
17
States reached
$333k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Food & Nutrition$9.9MHuman Services$950kPublic Safety & Disaster$860kInternational$564kEducation$140kHealth$136kHousing & Shelter$95kEmployment$80kOther$0
02FY2024 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 31 grants below total $1,549,508 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $5,522,289 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $3,972,781 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $9k
  • $10k–50k18 grants · $590k
  • $50k–250k11 grants · $617k
  • $250k+1 grant · $333k
$42,000
Median grant
17
States reached
$23M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WORLD FOOD PROGRAM USA$333,333
A PLACE CALLED HOME$75,000
KOINONIA FOSTER HOMES INC$70,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF PUERTO RICO INC$65,000
WILKINSON CENTER$57,000
CASA DE ESPERANZA DE LOS NINOS INC$50,000
CHILDREN'S HOME NETWORK$50,000
ERIE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE$50,000
YWCA OF WINSTON-SALEM & FORSYTH COUNTY$50,000
CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE INC$50,000
MARTHA'S TABLE$50,000
THE HUNGER PROJECT$50,000
LILY MISSIONS CENTER$47,000
NEW PATHWAYS FOR YOUTH INC$45,000
CENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC$45,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $4.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FRIENDLY HOUSE INC: $54k → 11%WELLSPRING WOMEN'S CENTER: $32k → 12%CENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC: $45k → 13%BARTON'S BOOSTERS INC: $45k → 11%LILY MISSIONS CENTER: $103k → 13%WORLD FOOD PROGRAM USA: $333k → 13%FRIENDLY HOUSE INC: $44k → 11%ACRES OF LOVE: $100k → 10%CENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC: $44k → 13%BARTON'S BOOSTERS INC: $44k → 11%LILY MISSIONS CENTER: $82k → 13%YWCA OF WINSTON-SALEM & FORSYTH COUNTY: $55k → 15%WORLD FOOD PROGRAM USA: $333k → 13%FRIENDLY HOUSE INC: $33k → 11%CENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC: $42k → 13%BARTON'S BOOSTERS INC: $42k → 11%LILY MISSIONS CENTER: $50k → 13%YWCA OF WINSTON-SALEM & FORSYTH COUNTY: $50k → 15%WORLD FOOD PROGRAM USA: $333k → 13%CENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC: $42k → 13%BARTON'S BOOSTERS INC: $41k → 11%LILY MISSIONS CENTER: $47k → 13%YWCA OF WINSTON-SALEM & FORSYTH COUNTY: $50k → 15%ERIE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $50k → 14%CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC: $40k → 13%BARTON'S BOOSTERS INC: $35k → 11%LILY MISSIONS CENTER: $47k → 13%YWCA OF WINSTON-SALEM & FORSYTH COUNTY: $50k → 15%ERIE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $50k → 14%CENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC: $40k → 13%WORLD FOOD PROGRAM USA: $358k → 14%BARTON'S BOOSTERS INC: $34k → 11%LILY MISSIONS CENTER: $47k → 13%YWCA OF WINSTON-SALEM & FORSYTH COUNTY: $45k → 15%ERIE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $50k → 14%WORLD FOOD PROGRAM USA: $333k → 14%YWCA OF WINSTON-SALEM AND FORSYTH COUNTY: $39k → 15%ERIE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $50k → 14%ERIE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $50k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS - GREATER LOS ANGELES: $195k → 14%ERIE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $50k → 14%ERIE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $34k → 14%CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE INC: $50k → 14%CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE INC: $50k → 14%CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE INC: $50k → 14%CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE INC: $50k → 14%CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE INC: $50k → 14%CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE INC: $45k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
NV
IA
IN
OH
CT
CA
UT
CO
AZ
NC
DC
OK
LA
GA
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region — $4.0M on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 9 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

East Asia and the Pacific$1.4M · 34% · 48 grants

Stated purpose: NUTRITION

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$1.1M · 27% · 24 grants

Stated purpose: NUTRITION

North America (Canada and Mexico)$881k · 22% · 34 grants

Stated purpose: NUTRITION

South America$257k · 7% · 14 grants

Stated purpose: NUTRITION

Sub-Saharan Africa$170k · 4% · 6 grants

Stated purpose: NUTRITION

Central America and the Caribbean$157k · 4% · 7 grants

Stated purpose: NUTRITION

Middle East and North Africa$30k · 1% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: NUTRITION

South Asia$12k · 0% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: NUTRITION

Russia and Neighboring States$10k · 0% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: NUTRITION

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$12M · 47 repeat orgs$1.0M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.

47 repeat relationships — 30 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

47
17

Total granted

$12M
$1.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+22%

Still filing today

96%
94%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesInternationalEducationFood & NutritionPhilanthropyHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC
    5× · 2019–2024 · $1.7M · revenue +578%
  • FT
    FEED THE CHILDREN INC
    5× · 2019–2023 · $900k · revenue +34%
  • Save The Children Federation Inc
    3× · 2017–2022 · $436k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • MEDSHARE INTERNATIONAL INC
    one grant, 2020 · $500k · revenue -58%
  • CS
    CALIFORNIA SCIENCE CENTER FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $130k · revenue +22%
  • AO
    ACRES OF LOVE
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue -44%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Home Society of California

The mission of children's home society of california is to provide children, families, and communities with supportive services to thrive.

Human Services
2
Youthbuild Global Inc

With love and respect, we partner with opportunity youth to build the skillsets and mindsets that lead to lifelong learning, livelihood, and leadership. youthbuild strives to create a world where all young people are seen for their…

Employment
3
Kidworks Community Development Corp

Kidworks inspires purpose in youth, fuels their growth, and catalyzes their impact in the community and the world.

Human Services
4
Child Welfare League of America

Child welfare league of america engages its network of public and private agencies and partners to advance policies, best practices, and collaborative strategies that result in better outcomes for vulnerable children, youth, and families.

Human Services
5
Child Lane

Child lane provides care in an environment where play is valued and children are supported to reach their full potential.

Human Services
6
Alternatives Inc

Alternatives, inc.'s mission is to facilitate personal development,strengthen family relationships and enhance the community's well being. serving over 3,000 youth and families annually, the organization offers a range of counseling and…

Health
7
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
8
California Children's Academy

Cca is committed to preparing young children to be global citizens who are developmentally well-rounded, emotionally literate, and environmentally conscious.

—
9
Childhood Education International

To promote innovative solutions to education challenges and inspire action that creates positive, sustainable futures for children and youth worldwide

—
10
Children's Hospital Los Angeles

Promotion and advancement of children's health through patient care, research, and education.

Health
11
Chicago Public Education Fund

The chicago public education fund (the fund) is a nonprofit organization that improves public schools in chicago by investing in the talented educators who lead them.

Education
12
South Central Family Health Center

To improve the quality of life for the diverse communities we serve providing affordable and comprehensive healthcare and education in a welcoming multi-cultural environment.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Institute Inc and the most unlike its peers is Village Book Builders Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFood Banks and PantriesImmigrant Worker SupportYouth Development CentersChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Cancer Support ServicesCommunity FoundationsYouth Development ServicesYmca Youth DevelopmentElementary Literacy TutoringLocal Food System Organizat…Affordable Housing Developm…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 44 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%9%5–10yr19%3%10–20yr16%19%20–35yr13%34%35–55yr16%36%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%0%10–20yr16%33%20–35yr13%22%35–55yr16%40%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%1/66
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,499

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

65 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
63/65
Grantees still filing
52/65
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC — $1,691,666 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INCLILY MISSIONS CENTER — $423,388 · Human ServicesLILY MISSIONS CENTERERIE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE — $333,575 · Human ServicesERIE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSECHILDREN'S INSTITUTE INC — $320,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S INSTITUTE INCYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WINSTON-SALEM AND FORSYTH COUNTY — $314,310 · Human ServicesYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF W…CENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC — $281,500 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INCWAYNE BARTON STUDY CENTER INC — $240,423 · Human ServicesFRIENDLY HOUSE INC — $220,575 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $217,913 · Human ServicesWELLSPRING WOMEN'S CENTER — $175,000 · Human Services+6 more — $364,000 · Human Services+6 moreA PLACE CALLED HOME — $434,000 · OtherA PLACE CALLED HOMEKOINONIA FOSTER HOMES INC — $349,500 · OtherKOINONIA FOSTER HOMES INCCASA DE ESPERANZA DE LOS NINOS INC — $293,500 · OtherCASA DE ESPERANZA DE LOS NINOS IN…BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF EL PASO — $267,293 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF EL PASOBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO DENVER INC — $195,000 · OtherYouth Farm and Market Project — $189,786 · OtherUNIDOSUS — $150,000 · OtherLEGACY HOUSING — $130,000 · OtherATLANTA CHILDREN'S SHELTER INCORPORATED — $266,486 · OtherATLANTA CHILDREN'S SHELTER INCORP…Orange County Rescue Mission Inc — $132,000 · OtherNew Pathways For Youth — $267,500 · OtherNew Pathways For YouthTRANSFORMATION MINISTRIES INC — $192,318 · OtherHEART OF LOS ANGELES YOUTH INC — $165,000 · OtherCALIFORNIA SCIENCE CENTER FOUNDATION — $130,000 · Other+17 more — $633,000 · Other+17 moreFEED THE CHILDREN INC — $900,000 · InternationalFEED THE CHILDREN INCMEDSHARE INTERNATIONAL INC — $500,000 · InternationalMEDSHARE INTERNATIONA…Save The Children Federation Inc — $436,253 · InternationalSave The Children Fed…The Global FoodBanking Network — $300,000 · InternationalThe Global FoodBankin…THE GLOBAL HUNGER PROJECT — $280,000 · InternationalTHE GLOBAL HUNGER PRO…WILKINSON CENTER — $313,076 · EducationHEALY-MURPHY CENTER — $221,500 · EducationDRAKE UNIVERSITY — $50,000 · EducationVILLAGE BOOK BUILDERS INC — $25,000 · EducationMARTHA'S TABLE INC — $330,000 · Food & NutritionCHILDREN'S HUNGER ALLIANCE — $184,000 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK GREATER NEW ORLEANS AND ACADIANA — $54,818 · Food & NutritionLULAC INSTITUTE INC — $190,000 · PhilanthropyVOLUNTEER CENTER SOUTH BAY-HARBOR- LONG BEACH — $187,000 · PhilanthropyLOS ANGELES BROTHERHOOD CRUSADE - BLACK UNITED FUND INC — $50,000 · PhilanthropyTHE CHILDREN'S HOME INC — $338,500 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $69,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $14,587 · Health
Human Services$4,582,350Other$3,795,383International$2,416,253Education$609,576Food & Nutrition$568,818Philanthropy$427,000Health$422,087

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC — $1,691,666 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetFEED THE CHILDREN INC — $900,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMEDSHARE INTERNATIONAL INC — $500,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc — $436,253 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetA PLACE CALLED HOME — $434,000 over 7y, 1.9% of budgetLILY MISSIONS CENTER — $423,388 over 7y, 44% of budgetKOINONIA FOSTER HOMES INC — $349,500 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOME INC — $338,500 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetERIE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE — $333,575 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetMARTHA'S TABLE INC — $330,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetCHILDREN'S INSTITUTE INC — $320,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WINSTON-SALEM AND FORSYTH COUNTY — $314,310 over 7y, 3.7% of budgetWILKINSON CENTER — $313,076 over 7y, 1.9% of budgetThe Global FoodBanking Network — $300,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetCASA DE ESPERANZA DE LOS NINOS INC — $293,500 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetCENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC — $281,500 over 7y, 2.4% of budgetTHE GLOBAL HUNGER PROJECT — $280,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetNew Pathways For Youth — $267,500 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF EL PASO — $267,293 over 7y, 5.8% of budgetATLANTA CHILDREN'S SHELTER INCORPORATED — $266,486 over 7y, 2.3% of budgetWAYNE BARTON STUDY CENTER INC — $240,423 over 6y, 15% of budgetHEALY-MURPHY CENTER — $221,500 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetFRIENDLY HOUSE INC — $220,575 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $217,913 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO DENVER INC — $195,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetTRANSFORMATION MINISTRIES INC — $192,318 over 6y, 6.9% of budgetLULAC INSTITUTE INC — $190,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetYouth Farm and Market Project — $189,786 over 6y, 4.7% of budgetVOLUNTEER CENTER SOUTH BAY-HARBOR- LONG BEACH — $187,000 over 6y, 3.9% of budgetCHILDREN'S HUNGER ALLIANCE — $184,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetWELLSPRING WOMEN'S CENTER — $175,000 over 6y, 3.2% of budgetHEART OF LOS ANGELES YOUTH INC — $165,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetUNIDOSUS — $150,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOME OF LUBBOCK AND FAMILY SERVICE AGENCY INC — $134,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetOrange County Rescue Mission Inc — $132,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCALIFORNIA SCIENCE CENTER FOUNDATION — $130,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF PUERTO RICO INC — $125,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetACRES OF LOVE — $100,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetCHRYSALIS CENTER — $80,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLOS ANGELES URBAN LEAGUE — $75,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetNATIONAL HISPANIC COUNCIL ON AGING — $75,000 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $69,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of Metropolitan Los Angeles — $55,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK GREATER NEW ORLEANS AND ACADIANA — $54,818 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCONGRESSIONAL HISPANIC CAUCUS INSTITUTE INC — $50,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK — $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDirect Selling Education Foundation — $50,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetDRAKE UNIVERSITY — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds FEED THE CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDSHARE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds A PLACE CALLED HOME ↗
  • Who funds LILY MISSIONS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds KOINONIA FOSTER HOMES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds ERIE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds MARTHA'S TABLE INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WINSTON-SALEM AND FORSYTH COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds WILKINSON CENTER ↗
  • Who funds The Global FoodBanking Network ↗
  • Who funds CASA DE ESPERANZA DE LOS NINOS INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GLOBAL HUNGER PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds New Pathways For Youth ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF EL PASO ↗
  • Who funds ATLANTA CHILDREN'S SHELTER INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds WAYNE BARTON STUDY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds HEALY-MURPHY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDLY HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO DENVER INC ↗
  • Who funds TRANSFORMATION MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds LULAC INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds Youth Farm and Market Project ↗
  • Who funds VOLUNTEER CENTER SOUTH BAY-HARBOR- LONG BEACH ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HUNGER ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds WELLSPRING WOMEN'S CENTER ↗
  • Who funds HEART OF LOS ANGELES YOUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIDOSUS ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOME OF LUBBOCK AND FAMILY SERVICE AGENCY INC ↗
  • Who funds Orange County Rescue Mission Inc ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA SCIENCE CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF PUERTO RICO INC ↗
  • Who funds ACRES OF LOVE ↗
  • Who funds CHRYSALIS CENTER ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The California Endowm…The Ralph M Parsons F…California Community …Weingart FoundationThe California Wellne…The Annenberg Foundat…Globalgiving Foundati…The Blackbaud Giving …Charities Aid Foundat…Los Angeles Rams Foun…The Gap FoundationGreat Public Schools …
The California EndowmentCA17.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The California Endowment · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · California Community Foundation · Weingart Foundation · The California Wellness Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · Globalgiving Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Los Angeles Rams Foundation · The Gap Foundation · Great Public Schools Now

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Herbalife Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
  • City Year Inc — 11% of income from government
  • Friendly House Inc — 8% of income from government
  • Feed the Children Inc — 1% of income from government
  • The Children's Home Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
20report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 65 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines