· Private foundation
Henrietta Aigner and Joy Baldwin Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k12 grants · $35k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $135k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ALL OPTIONS | $40,000 |
| URBAN PEAK | $30,000 |
| VAMONOS OUTSIDE | $25,000 |
| THE CIRCUIT EPA | $20,000 |
| MOUNTAIN DREAMERS | $10,000 |
| OREGON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| THE TENDER FOUNDATION | $5,400 |
| THE READING TEAM | $5,000 |
| ULTIMATE IMPACT | $5,000 |
| FAMILY KITCHEN | $5,000 |
| THE ELEPHANT FARM INC | $5,000 |
| HER VILLAGE INC | $3,000 |
| BERKELEY ATHLETIC FUND | $2,000 |
| NEW EACH MORNING | $1,030 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $218k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 77% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against +39% for the ones you funded once.
17 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $34k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AAll-Options4× · 2022–2025 · $131k · revenue +59%
- UIUltimate Impact Inc5× · 2021–2025 · $105k · revenue +9%
- TTHORN3× · 2017–2019 · $100k · revenue +417%
Funded once
- SHSHEPHERD'S HOUSE MINISTRIESgraduatedone grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue +39%
- MAMetropolitan Area Advisory Committee on Anti-Poverty of San Diego County Incgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue +47%
- SSSHE SHOULD RUNone grant, 2018 · $20k · revenue -43%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Empower women to achieve economic independence by providing a network of support, professional attire and tools to help them thrive in work and in life
Oregon Justice Network is an alliance built and staffed by criminal legal system impacted people advocating for the well-being of people affected or at-risk of being affected by carceral systems. Our work centers around restorative…
Community Forward SF's support services create pathways from crisis to long-term stability through our Women's Wellness Pathway, a proven continuum linking a 24/7 drop-in center, shelter, transitional housing, behavioral health care, and…
We are Marin's champion in the movement to end domestic violence - working at the intersection of survivors, systems, and community.
To empower homeless families with children to get back into housing - and to stay there.
Alternatives, inc.'s mission is to facilitate personal development,strengthen family relationships and enhance the community's well being. serving over 3,000 youth and families annually, the organization offers a range of counseling and…
The Eviction Defense Collaborative strives to prevent homelessness, preserveaffordable housing, and protect the diversity of San Francisco. We work toward thesegoals by providing emergency rental assistance and by helping low-income…
Legal Link removes legal barriers that prolong poverty by adding critically needed capacity to the legal ecosystem.
Next up amplifies the voice of diverse youth to achieve a more just oregon
The Network is a group of 40+ member organizations dedicated to improving the lives of those impacted by gender-based violence through education, public policy and advocacy, and connecting community members with direct service providers.…
Impact nw prevents homelessness by supporting people as they navigate their journey to stability and strength. founded in portland in 1966, impact nw now serves 26,944 people a year in the greater portland, oregon metro area, including…
Compass family services helps homeless families and those at imminent risk to achieve housing stability, economic self-sufficiency, and well-being.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Center for Family Philanthropy Inc and the most unlike its peers is Berkeley Athletic Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 15 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 15% of your grantees by number, and just 10% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
45 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 45 of the 69 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds All-Options ↗
- Who funds Ultimate Impact Inc ↗
- Who funds THORN ↗
- Who funds LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds THE CIRCUIT EPA ↗
- Who funds NATURECONNECT CENTRAL OREGON ↗
- Who funds Oregon State University Foundation ↗
- Who funds DAWNS HOUSE CORPORATION LLC ↗
- Who funds SHEPHERD'S HOUSE MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds Metropolitan Area Advisory Committee on Anti-Poverty of San Diego County Inc ↗
- Who funds SHE SHOULD RUN ↗
- Who funds DEMOCRACY WORKS INC ↗
- Who funds TENDER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE KEYSTONE SCIENCE SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds WARM WINTERS ↗
- Who funds WILDLAND FIREFIGHTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Friends of the Great Commission ↗
- Who funds Cobscook Community Learning Center ↗
- Who funds MOUNTAIN DREAMERS ↗
- Who funds THE OREGON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Bay Area Disc Association ↗
- Who funds THE UNITY CARE GROUP ↗
- Who funds FAMILY KITCHEN ↗
- Who funds Life After Hate Inc ↗
- Who funds READING TEAM INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The San Francisco Foundation · Central Oregon Health Council · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The Oregon Community Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Greater Washington Community Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Chicago Community Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Tides Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Henrietta Aigner and Joy Baldwin Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Dawns House Corporation Llc — 27% of income from government
- Thrive Central Oregon — 12% of income from government
- The Oregon Community Foundation — 2% of income from government
- Oregon State University Foundation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Henrietta Aigner and Joy Baldwin Family Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Henrietta Aigner and Joy Baldwin Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.