Skip to content
Henrietta Aigner and Joy Baldwin Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Henrietta Aigner and Joy Baldwin Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$170k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$253kPublic Benefit$125kYouth Development$106kCrime & Legal$100kCivil Rights$82kHousing & Shelter$63kEducation$50kPhilanthropy$38kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $135k
$5,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALL OPTIONS$40,000
URBAN PEAK$30,000
VAMONOS OUTSIDE$25,000
THE CIRCUIT EPA$20,000
MOUNTAIN DREAMERS$10,000
OREGON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$10,000
THE TENDER FOUNDATION$5,400
THE READING TEAM$5,000
ULTIMATE IMPACT$5,000
THE ELEPHANT FARM INC$5,000
FAMILY KITCHEN$5,000
HER VILLAGE INC$3,000
BERKELEY ATHLETIC FUND$2,000
NEW EACH MORNING$1,030
Individual grant recipient$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $218k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 77% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Unity Care Group: $8k → 8%MAAC PROJECT: $20k → 11%THORN: $50k → 14%SHE SHOULD RUN: $20k → 14%THE TENDER FOUNDATION: $5k → 13%THORN: $30k → 14%THE READING TEAM: $5k → 17%THRIVE CENTRAL OREGON: $2k → 10%THE TENDER FOUNDATION: $10k → 13%THE CIRCUIT EPA: $20k → 8%THORN: $20k → 14%THE CIRCUIT EPA: $20k → 8%HER VILLAGE INC: $3k → 17%THE TENDER FOUNDATION: $2k → 13%THE TENDER FOUNDATION: $2k → 13%NEW EACH MORNING: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
IL
NY
MA
OR
OH
CT
CA
CO
MO
NC
DC
LA
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$736k · 17 repeat orgs$311k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against +27% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
41

Total granted

$736k
$277k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+27%

Still filing today

71%
59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $34k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthCivil RightsEnvironmentPhilanthropyReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • A
    All-Options
    4× · 2022–2025 · $131k · revenue +59%
  • UI
    Ultimate Impact Inc
    5× · 2021–2025 · $105k · revenue +9%
  • T
    THORN
    3× · 2017–2019 · $100k · revenue +417%

Funded once

  • SH
    SHEPHERD'S HOUSE MINISTRIESgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue +39%
  • HF
    HISPANIC FEDERATION - PUERTO RICO
    one grant, 2017 · $20k
  • DW
    DEMOCRACY WORKS INC
    one grant, 2018 · $20k · revenue -54%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dress for Success Oregon

Empower women to achieve economic independence by providing a network of support, professional attire and tools to help them thrive in work and in life

Human Services
2
Oregon Justice Network

Oregon Justice Network is an alliance built and staffed by criminal legal system impacted people advocating for the well-being of people affected or at-risk of being affected by carceral systems. Our work centers around restorative…

Human Services
3
Community Forward Sf Inc

Community Forward SF's support services create pathways from crisis to long-term stability through our Women's Wellness Pathway, a proven continuum linking a 24/7 drop-in center, shelter, transitional housing, behavioral health care, and…

Health
4
Center for Domestic Peace

We are Marin's champion in the movement to end domestic violence - working at the intersection of survivors, systems, and community.

Human Services
5
Path Home

To empower homeless families with children to get back into housing - and to stay there.

Housing & Shelter
6
Alternatives Inc

Alternatives, inc.'s mission is to facilitate personal development,strengthen family relationships and enhance the community's well being. serving over 3,000 youth and families annually, the organization offers a range of counseling and…

Health
7
Eviction Defense Collaborative Inc

The Eviction Defense Collaborative strives to prevent homelessness, preserveaffordable housing, and protect the diversity of San Francisco. We work toward thesegoals by providing emergency rental assistance and by helping low-income…

Housing & Shelter
8
Legal Link

Legal Link removes legal barriers that prolong poverty by adding critically needed capacity to the legal ecosystem.

Crime & Legal
9
New Progressive Network

Next up amplifies the voice of diverse youth to achieve a more just oregon

Civil Rights
10
The Network Advocating Against Domestic Violence

The Network is a group of 40+ member organizations dedicated to improving the lives of those impacted by gender-based violence through education, public policy and advocacy, and connecting community members with direct service providers.…

Human Services
11
Impact Nw

Impact nw prevents homelessness by supporting people as they navigate their journey to stability and strength. founded in portland in 1966, impact nw now serves 26,944 people a year in the greater portland, oregon metro area, including…

Human Services
12
Compass Family Services

Compass family services helps homeless families and those at imminent risk to achieve housing stability, economic self-sufficiency, and well-being.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Center for Family Philanthropy Inc; the most unlike its peers is Berkeley Athletic Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

45 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 45 of the 69 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
44/45
Grantees still filing
28/45
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS EDUCATION FUND: $85,000 · OtherLEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS EDUCATION FUNDIndividual grant recipient: $60,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTAKE BACK THE COURT: $40,000 · OtherTAKE BACK THE COURTURBAN PEAK: $32,000 · OtherURBAN PEAKHISPANIC FEDERATION - PUERTO RICO: $20,000 · OtherPCTA: $15,000 · OtherWARM WINTERS: $14,500 · OtherSHEPHERD'S HOUSE MINISTRIES: $25,000 · OtherSHEPHERD'S HOUSE MINISTRIES+35 more: $142,801 · Other+35 moreAll-Options: $131,200 · Human ServicesAll-OptionsTHORN: $100,000 · Human ServicesTHORNTHE CIRCUIT EPA: $40,000 · Human ServicesTHE CIRCUIT EPAMetropolitan Area Advisory Committee on Anti-Poverty of San Diego County Inc: $20,000 · Human ServicesMetropolitan Area Advisory Committee …SHE SHOULD RUN: $20,000 · Human ServicesSHE SHOULD RUNTENDER FOUNDATION INC: $19,560 · Human ServicesTENDER FOUNDATION INC+6 more: $20,530 · Human Services+6 moreUltimate Impact Inc: $105,000 · Youth DevelopmentUltimate Im…+1 more: $825 · Youth DevelopmentOregon State University Foundation: $30,000 · EducationTHE KEYSTONE SCIENCE SCHOOL INC: $15,000 · EducationDAWNS HOUSE CORPORATION LLC: $26,000 · PhilanthropyTHE OREGON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · PhilanthropyONE TREE PLANTED INC: $5,000 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL CENTER FOR FAMILY PHILANTHROPY INC: $2,000 · PhilanthropyDEMOCRACY WORKS INC: $20,000 · Civil RightsMOUNTAIN DREAMERS: $10,000 · Civil RightsGUNSDOWN INC: $5,000 · Civil RightsLife After Hate Inc: $5,000 · Civil RightsNATURECONNECT CENTRAL OREGON: $30,000 · Recreation & SportsBay Area Disc Association: $8,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$434,301Human Services$351,290Youth Development$105,825Education$45,000Philanthropy$43,000Civil Rights$40,000Recreation & Sports$38,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAll-Options: $131,200 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetUltimate Impact Inc: $105,000 over 5y, 4.0% of budgetTHORN: $100,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetLEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS EDUCATION FUND: $85,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetTHE CIRCUIT EPA: $40,000 over 2y, 25% of budgetOregon State University Foundation: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATURECONNECT CENTRAL OREGON: $30,000 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetDAWNS HOUSE CORPORATION LLC: $26,000 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetSHEPHERD'S HOUSE MINISTRIES: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDEMOCRACY WORKS INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMetropolitan Area Advisory Committee on Anti-Poverty of San Diego County Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHE SHOULD RUN: $20,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetTENDER FOUNDATION INC: $19,560 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetTHE KEYSTONE SCIENCE SCHOOL INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetFriends of the Great Commission: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCobscook Community Learning Center: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetWILDLAND FIREFIGHTER FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBay Area Disc Association: $8,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE UNITY CARE GROUP: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetONE TREE PLANTED INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGUNSDOWN INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetREADING TEAM INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetLife After Hate Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetHOPE REINS: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMOHONK PRESERVE INC: $2,076 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNational Network of Abortion Funds: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHRIVE CENTRAL OREGON: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Fistula Foundation: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBerkeley Athletic Fund: $2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFamily Promise of Spokane: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALPHA PROJECT FOR THE HOMELESS: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINFO LINE OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL CENTER FOR FAMILY PHILANTHROPY INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALS Northwest: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEW EACH MORNING: $1,030 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetMIDDLE EAST CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIMENTOR INC: $825 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT HEAL HELP TO EAT ACCEPT & LIVE: $225 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The San Francisco Fou…Central Oregon Health…Silicon Valley Commun…The Oregon Community …First Interstate Banc…Greater Washington Co…The Blackbaud Giving …The Pfizer Foundation…The Chicago Community…Vanguard Charitable E…Tides FoundationGs Donor Advised Phil…
The San Francisco FoundationCA14.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The San Francisco Foundation · Central Oregon Health Council · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The Oregon Community Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Greater Washington Community Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Chicago Community Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Tides Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Henrietta Aigner and Joy Baldwin Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Henrietta Aigner and Joy Baldwin Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Dawns House Corporation Llc: 27% of income from government
  • Thrive Central Oregon: 12% of income from government
  • The Oregon Community Foundation: 2% of income from government
  • Oregon State University Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Henrietta Aigner and Joy Baldwin Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Henrietta Aigner and Joy Baldwin Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 69 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Henrietta Aigner and Joy Baldwin Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home