· Private foundation
Henderson Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k57 grants · $170k
- $10k–50k13 grants · $196k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $221k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LIONHEART CLASSICAL ACADEMY | $100,000 |
| MT AUBURN HOSPITAL | $70,000 |
| SILENT BRIDGE | $51,000 |
| THE ASSOCIATION OF FOREIGN PRESS CORRESPONDENTS IN THE UNITED STATES | $24,000 |
| FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES | $23,000 |
| SD USA | $23,000 |
| SALISBURY SCHOOL EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION | $22,500 |
| SALVATION ARMY | $15,000 |
| AMERICAN AGRI-WOMEN RESOURCE CENTER | $15,000 |
| SACO RIVER THEATRE | $13,000 |
| MENTAL HEALTH GLOBAL | $10,000 |
| ACCURACY IN MEDIA | $10,000 |
| NEWTON WELLESLEY HOSPITAL | $10,000 |
| CENTER FOR SECURITY POLICY | $10,000 |
| HALO TRUST | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $453k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 75% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +43% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.
132 repeat relationships — 56 still active in FY2024, 76 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $110k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TSTHE SALISBURY SCHOOL EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC8× · 2017–2024 · $172k · revenue +607% · 52% of their budget
- PQPROJECT QUEST7× · 2017–2023 · $159k · revenue +78%
- PVPROJECT VERITAS6× · 2017–2022 · $135k · revenue +158%
Funded once
- CLChild Liberation Foundation Incgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $75k · revenue ×13
- PPPOLARIS PROJECTone grant, 2021 · $44k · revenue -31%
- NYNEW YORK FAMILY ENTERPRISE CENTERone grant, 2017 · $20k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…
The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…
Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.
Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
To provide accurate, objective information and analysis on international strategic issues for legislators, diplomats, foreign affairs analysts, international business leaders, economists, the military, defense commentators, journalists,…
Saint anselm is a catholic, benedictine college providing all of its students a distinctive liberal arts education that incorporates opportunities for professional and career preparation. it does so in a learning community that encourages…
Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Albert & Mary Lasker Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
143 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 143 of the 232 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CENTER FOR SECURITY POLICY INC ↗
- Who funds THE SALISBURY SCHOOL EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PROJECT QUEST ↗
- Who funds PROJECT VERITAS ↗
- Who funds Trustees of Dartmouth College ↗
- Who funds SILENTBRIDGE ↗
- Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES ↗
- Who funds THE BOSTON WOODWIND SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds Child Liberation Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds The Saco River Theatre ↗
- Who funds Leadership Institute ↗
- Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN PUBLIC MEDIA INC ↗
- Who funds ITHACA COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds POLARIS PROJECT ↗
- Who funds NEADS INC ↗
- Who funds THE LOOMIS INSTITUTE D/B/A THE LOOMIS CHAFFEE SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds CONNECTICUT COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds OpenStage Theatre and Co Inc ↗
- Who funds Wellesley College ↗
- Who funds WELLS COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds BELMONT HILL SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds ACCURACY IN MEDIA INC ↗
- Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds Monadnock Community Hospital ↗
- Who funds OPERA FORT COLLINS INC ↗
- Who funds Public Radio for the Front Range ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a loosely connected circle, clustered around a few shared anchors.
Open a dossier: Middlesex Savings Charitable Foundation Inc · Sarah Scaife Foundation Incorporated · Boston Foundation Inc · Community Foundation for MetroWest Inc · Donors Trust Inc · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · Maine Community Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of the Eastern Shor · The William H Donner Foundation Inc · William D Lynch Foundation For Children · The Jebediah Foundation 7563-Xxxxxx00129 · Eric Javits Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Henderson Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Hias Inc — 88% of income from government
- Vinfen Corporation — 83% of income from government
- The Edinburg Center Inc — 81% of income from government
- Minuteman Senior Services Inc — 73% of income from government
- Springwell Inc — 68% of income from government
- Diakonia Inc — 51% of income from government
- The Parents' Place of Maryland Inc — 30% of income from government
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- The Walden Woods Project — 6% of income from government
- Connecticut Children's Medical Center — 5% of income from government
- Special Olympics Massachusetts Inc — 1% of income from government
- Neads Inc — 1% of income from government
- New England Conservatory of Music — 1% of income from government
- Wellesley College — 1% of income from government
- Worcester County Food Bank Inc — 1% of income from government
- Connecticut College — 0% of income from government
- Amherst College Trustees — 0% of income from government
- Museum of Fine Arts — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.