· Private foundation
Eric Javits Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k68 grants · $70k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $49k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AA ALUMNI FOUNDATION INC | $15,000 |
| TURNING POINT USA NFP | $13,000 |
| THE SOCIETY OF FOUR ARTS | $11,000 |
| AMERICAN FIRST LEGAL FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| PALM BEACH CIVIC ASSOCIATION | $6,000 |
| FOUNDATION FOR DEFENSE OF DEMOCRACIES | $5,000 |
| MIDDLE EAST FORUM | $5,000 |
| JUDICIAL WATCH | $5,000 |
| PINE CREST SCHOOL | $3,000 |
| INSTITURE FOR A SECURE AMERICA | $2,000 |
| THE INVESTIGATIVE PROJECT ON TERRORISM | $2,000 |
| PUBLIC INTEREST LEGAL FOUNDATION | $2,000 |
| NATIONAL LEGAL & POLICY CENTER | $2,000 |
| THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION | $1,500 |
| BETA THETA PI FDN | $1,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–18, $600) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.
111 repeat relationships — 60 still active in FY2025, 51 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CRCHOATE ROSEMARY HALL FOUNDATION INCORPORATED5× · 2017–2021 · $50k · revenue +3%
- TPTURNING POINT USA INC9× · 2017–2025 · $42k · revenue ×14
- AAAA ALUMNI FOUNDATION INC7× · 2019–2025 · $41k · revenue +73%
Funded once
- AAAA ALUMNI FOUNDATIONone grant, 2017 · $5k
- ETEMP TASK INC NAT HOMELAND SECURITYone grant, 2018 · $3k
- PBPALM BEACH DAY ACADEMY INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue +80%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…
To provide accurate, objective information and analysis on international strategic issues for legislators, diplomats, foreign affairs analysts, international business leaders, economists, the military, defense commentators, journalists,…
American foreign service association (afsa) is both the principal advocate for the long-term institutional wellbeing of the professional career foreign service and responsible for safeguarding the interest of afsa members. (continued on…
Preservation of civil liberties through litigation and public education.
The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…
Iri advances freedom and democracy worldwide by developing political parties, civic institutions, open elections, democratic governance and the rule of law.
The peterson institute for international economics (piie) is an independent nonprofit, nonpartisan research organization dedicated to strengthening prosperity and human welfare in the global economy through expert analysis and practical…
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
Provide post-secondary education of excellence.
American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…
Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Museum of the City of New York. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
101 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 101 of the 189 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CHOATE ROSEMARY HALL FOUNDATION INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗
- Who funds AA ALUMNI FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Palm Beach Civic Association Inc ↗
- Who funds America First Legal Foundation ↗
- Who funds PUBLIC INTEREST LEGAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL LEGAL AND POLICY CENTER ↗
- Who funds Independent Women's Forum ↗
- Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds THE GEORGE W BUSH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PINE CREST PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds COUNCIL OF AMERICAN AMBASSADORS ↗
- Who funds STATE POLICY NETWORK ↗
- Who funds JOHN JAY SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds TAX FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The Palm Beach Police and Fire Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds Glades Academy Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL REVIEW INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds COMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds COMMITTEE FOR A CONSTRUCTIVE TOMORROW ↗
- Who funds Town of Palm Beach United Way Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Donors Trust Inc · Bradley Impact Fund Inc · Farrell Family Foundation · Sarah Scaife Foundation Incorporated · John P & Kathryn G Evans Foundation · The Sandra & Lawrence Post Family Foundation · Triad Foundation Inc · The Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation Inc · The Yaseen Family Foundation Inc · Garvey Kansas Foundation · Bailey Family Foundation Inc · Ken W Davis Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Eric Javits Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Shriners' Hospital for Children — 6% of income from government
- New Hope Charities Inc — 0% of income from government
- Palm Beach Day Academy Inc — 0% of income from government
- Choate Rosemary Hall Foundation Incorporated — 0% of income from government
- Pine Crest Preparatory School Inc — 0% of income from government
- Palm Beach Atlantic University Inc — 0% of income from government
- K9S for Warriors Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.