Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Helen R Coe Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$130k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Education$513kArts & Culture$81kPublic Safety & Disaster$44kFood & Nutrition$38kYouth Development$35kReligion$12kRecreation & Sports$10kPhilanthropy$9kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k21 grants · $116k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $22k
$7,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$12,000
UNIVERSITY OF MAINE$10,000
PAUL SMITH COLLEGE$9,000
UNIVERSITY OF MAINE$9,000
MAINE MARITIME ACADEMY$9,000
UNIVERSITY OF MAINE$9,000
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE$9,000
LOVELL UNITED CHURCH$8,215
Individual grant recipient$8,215
LOVELL BRICK CHURCH FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS$8,215
LOVELL HISTORICAL SOCIETY$8,215
THOMAS COLLEGE$7,000
UNIVERSITY OF MAINE - AUGUSTA$5,308
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE$4,079
NEW SUNCOOK SCHOOL$4,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 79% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ENDICOTT COLLEGE: $8k → 10%EMMANUEL COLLEGE: $9k → 16%STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE AND TECHNOLOGY AT COBLE: $8k → 10%ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $8k → 14%PAUL SMITH COLLEGE: $9k → 16%GREAT BAY COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $9k → 5%WHITE MOUNTAIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $9k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF MAINE: $12k → 15%EMMANUEL COLLEGE: $8k → 16%PAUL SMITH COLLEGE: $9k → 16%THOMAS COLLEGE: $8k → 12%CENTRAL MAINE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $8k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF MAINE: $10k → 15%SIMMONS COLLEGE: $8k → 16%PAUL SMITH COLLEGE: $8k → 16%LOVELL RECREATION DEPARTMENT: $12k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF MAINE: $10k → 15%EMMANUEL COLLEGE: $8k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE: $11k → 7%LOVELL HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $11k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF MAINE: $9k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE: $10k → 7%LOVELL RECREATION DEPARTMENT: $10k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF MAINE: $9k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE: $9k → 7%LOVELL HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $10k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF MAINE: $9k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE: $9k → 7%LOVELL RECREATION DEPARTMENT: $9k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF MAINE: $9k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE: $8k → 7%LOVELL BRICK CHURCH FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $9k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF MAINE: $9k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE: $8k → 7%LOVELL UNITED CHURCH: $9k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF MAINE: $9k → 15%LOVELL HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $9k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF MAINE: $8k → 15%LOVELL BRICK CHURCH FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $8k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF MAINE: $8k → 15%LOVELL UNITED CHURCH: $8k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF MAINE: $8k → 15%LOVELL HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $8k → 13%LOVELL HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $8k → 13%FRYEBURG RESCUE: $11k → 13%FRYEBURG ACADEMY: $10k → 13%FRYEBURG RESCUE: $8k → 13%FRYEBURG RESCUE: $8k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 7% of Helen R Coe Trust’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 89% of the giving stays in ME; read by stated purpose it is 84% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Helen R Coe Trustlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.1% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$589k · 22 repeat orgs$164k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
25

Total granted

$589k
$144k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+5%
+36%

Still filing today

36%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthFood & NutritionArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PS
    PAUL SMITHS COLLEGE
    3× · 2023–2025 · $26k · revenue +6%
  • EMMANUEL COLLEGE
    3× · 2021–2024 · $25k · revenue +22%
  • CH
    CHARLOTTE HOBBS MEMORIAL LIBRARY
    4× · 2021–2024 · $22k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • FA
    Fryeburg Academygraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +48%
  • WM
    WHITE MOUNTAIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE
    one grant, 2022 · $9k
  • NU
    NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND
    one grant, 2022 · $9k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dean College

Dean college is a private, residential new england college grounded in a culture and tradition that all students deserve the opportunity to discover and exceed their greatest aspirations. a personal and transformative community since 1865,…

Education
2
The President and Trustees of Colby College

to provide a rigorous and transformative liberal arts education that prepares students to become thoughtful, engaged citizens.

Education
3
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

4
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
5
Dickinson College

Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship

Education
6
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
7
Saint Anselm College

Saint anselm is a catholic, benedictine college providing all of its students a distinctive liberal arts education that incorporates opportunities for professional and career preparation. it does so in a learning community that encourages…

Education
8
Macalester College

Macalester is committed to being a preeminent liberal arts college with an educational program known for its high standards for scholarship and its special emphasis on internationalism, multiculturalism, and service to society.

Education
9
Nichols College

Nichols college strives to develop tomorrow's leaders through a dynamic, career-focused business education. the college transforms students into successful graduates who respond to challenges, are eager for responsibility, and assume…

Education
10
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
11
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
12
Amherst College Trustees

Amherst college educates students of exceptional potential from all backgrounds so that they may seek value and advance knowledge, engage the world around them, and lead principled lives of consequence. amherst brings together the most…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Emmanuel College and the most unlike its peers is Stoneham Rescue Service Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity Arts OrganizationsPublic Library SupportFood Pantries & AssistanceVolunteer Fire DepartmentsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Independent K-8 Schools
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 54 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number16%7%<5yr12%7%5–10yr19%7%10–20yr19%7%20–35yr16%22%35–55yr18%48%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value16%7%<5yr12%7%5–10yr19%6%10–20yr19%15%20–35yr16%13%35–55yr18%51%55yr+

The field is 16% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 7% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/29
the rest of the field
9%
845/9,522

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/24
Grantees still filing
18/24
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF MAINE — $115,506 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MAINEUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE — $74,409 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINEIndividual grant recipient — $42,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $39,385 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLOVELL BRICK CHURCH FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS — $27,533 · OtherLOVELL BRICK CHURCH FOR THE PERFORMING ARTSNEW SUNCOOK SCHOOL — $24,633 · OtherSUNSHINE BACKPACK FOOD PROGRAM — $21,500 · OtherLOVELL UNITED CHURCH — $20,248 · Other+21 more — $119,230 · Other+21 morePAUL SMITHS COLLEGE — $26,000 · EducationPAUL SMITHS COLLEGEEMMANUEL COLLEGE — $25,000 · EducationEMMANUEL COLLEGECHARLOTTE HOBBS MEMORIAL LIBRARY — $22,014 · EducationCHARLOTTE HOBBS MEMORIAL LIBRARYBowdoin College — $20,220 · EducationBowdoin CollegeTHOMAS COLLEGE — $16,000 · EducationTHOMAS COLLEGESIMMONS UNIVERSITY — $15,600 · EducationSIMMONS UNIVERSITYCURRY COLLEGE — $12,000 · EducationCURRY COLLEGEFryeburg Academy — $10,000 · EducationRochester Institute of Technology — $8,000 · EducationSavannah College of Art and DesignInc — $8,000 · EducationSARAH LAWRENCE COLLEGE — $8,000 · EducationBABSON COLLEGE — $7,600 · EducationMAINE COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN — $7,600 · EducationENDICOTT COLLEGE — $7,600 · EducationColby-Sawyer College — $7,600 · EducationSTONEHILL COLLEGE INC — $7,600 · Education+2 more — $8,350 · EducationLOVELL HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $46,215 · Arts & CultureSTONEHAM RESCUE SERVICE INC — $2,000 · HealthUnited Ambulance Service — $1,000 · HealthLovell Area Food Pantry Inc — $1,500 · Food & NutritionSWEDEN FOOD PANTRY — $1,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$484,444Education$217,184Arts & Culture$46,215Health$3,000Food & Nutrition$2,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLOVELL HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $46,215 over 5y, 25% of budgetPAUL SMITHS COLLEGE — $26,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEMMANUEL COLLEGE — $25,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBowdoin College — $20,220 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHOMAS COLLEGE — $16,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSIMMONS UNIVERSITY — $15,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCURRY COLLEGE — $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFryeburg Academy — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRochester Institute of Technology — $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSavannah College of Art and DesignInc — $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSARAH LAWRENCE COLLEGE — $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBABSON COLLEGE — $7,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAINE COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN — $7,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetENDICOTT COLLEGE — $7,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLANDMARK COLLEGE INC — $7,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetColby-Sawyer College — $7,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTONEHILL COLLEGE INC — $7,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN UNIVERSITY — $5,350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCLARKSON UNIVERSITY — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTONEHAM RESCUE SERVICE INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSWEDEN FOOD PANTRY — $1,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetUnited Ambulance Service — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LOVELL HISTORICAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds PAUL SMITHS COLLEGE
  • Who funds EMMANUEL COLLEGE
  • Who funds CHARLOTTE HOBBS MEMORIAL LIBRARY
  • Who funds Bowdoin College
  • Who funds THOMAS COLLEGE
  • Who funds SIMMONS UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds CURRY COLLEGE
  • Who funds Fryeburg Academy
  • Who funds Rochester Institute of Technology
  • Who funds Savannah College of Art and DesignInc
  • Who funds SARAH LAWRENCE COLLEGE
  • Who funds BABSON COLLEGE
  • Who funds MAINE COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN
  • Who funds ENDICOTT COLLEGE
  • Who funds LANDMARK COLLEGE INC
  • Who funds Colby-Sawyer College
  • Who funds STONEHILL COLLEGE INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN UNIVERSITY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Davis Educational FoundationME15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Davis Educational Foundation · Stephen & Tabitha King Foundation Inc · Davis Family Foundation · Maine Community Foundation Inc · Fidelity Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Helen R Coe Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Landmark College Inc6% of income from government
  • Stonehill College Inc1% of income from government
  • Curry College0% of income from government
  • Simmons University0% of income from government
  • Babson College0% of income from government
  • Endicott College0% of income from government
  • Emmanuel College0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph