Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hegi Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$300k
Granted FY2025still arriving
39
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$828kEducation$670kArts & Culture$293kEnvironment$173kHealth$166kReligion$138kHousing & Shelter$113kRecreation & Sports$103kOther$0
02FY2025 · 39 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k27 grants · $77k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $163k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$3.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CRYSTAL CHARITY BALL$60,000
THE SENIOR SOURCE$25,000
DALLAS WOMENS CLUB$16,600
SOUTHERN METHODIST UNIVERSITY$16,550
AT&T PERFORMING ARTS CENTER$15,000
THE DALLAS FOUNDATION$15,000
GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF DALLAS$15,000
PI PHI STYLE SHOW$15,000
KERSHAW'S CHALLENGE$15,000
SALESMANSHIP CLUB CHARITABLE GOLF OF DALLAS$10,000
GEORGE W BUSH PRESIDENTIAL CENTER$10,000
HIGHLAND PARK EDUCATION FOUNDATION$10,000
AMERICAN HUMANE SOCIETY$6,000
THE STEWPOT ALLIANCE$5,500
REVIVE TEXAS MINISTRIES$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $152k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MOBILITY WORKS FOUNDATION: $500 → 13%ETHIOPIAN COMMUNITY ASSOCATION OF CHICAGO: $250 → 14%COMMUNITY PARTNERS OF DALLAS: $10k → 14%COMMUNITY PARTNERS OF DALLAS: $5k → 14%COMMUNITY PARTNERS OF DALLAS: $5k → 14%COMMUNITY PARTNERS OF DALLAS: $4k → 14%COMMUNITY PARTNERS OF DALLAS: $4k → 14%JUBILEE PARK: $1k → 14%JUBILEE PARK: $1k → 14%JUBILEE PARK: $500 → 14%INTERFAITH FAMILY SERVICES: $43k → 14%INTERFAITH FAMILY SERVICES: $31k → 14%INTERFAITH FAMILY SERVICES: $30k → 14%INTERFAITH FAMILY SERVICES: $13k → 14%INTERFAITH FAMILY SERVICES: $2k → 14%INTERFAITH FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 14%YMCA OF METRO DALLAS: $250 → 14%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS: $250 → 14%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS: $250 → 14%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS: $250 → 14%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS: $250 → 14%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS: $250 → 14%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS: $250 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
MN
IL
NY
MA
OH
CA
CO
MO
KS
TN
NC
DC
OK
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.6M · 77 repeat orgs$327k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against +28% for those funded once.

77 repeat relationships: 24 still active in FY2025, 53 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

77
88

Total granted

$2.6M
$269k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+28%

Still filing today

62%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $59k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Southern Methodist University
    9× · 2017–2025 · $406k · revenue +57%
  • TC
    THE CRYSTAL CHARITY BALL
    9× · 2017–2025 · $390k · revenue +11%
  • SC
    SENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER DALLAS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $221k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • AF
    ADVOCATES FOR COMMUNITY TRANSFORMATION
    one grant, 2018 · $41k
  • HP
    HIGHLAND PARK CHEERLEADING BOOSTER CLUB
    one grant, 2024 · $27k · revenue +13%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $16k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dallas Citizens Council

To lead and serve in the moments that matter the most for the people of dallas.

—
2
Dallas County Medical Society

The mission of the dallas county medical society is to promote public health and advocate for physicians and their relationship with patients, while upholding professionalism in the practice of medicine.

—
3
Dallas College Foundation Inc

Dallas college foundation enhances the level of achievement and excellence of dallas college by providing scholarships, eliminating barriers that prevent students from attending and graduating, and supporting innovation.

Education
4
Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council

The mission of the Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council is to drive evidence-based improvement in patient care and health equity throughout the region.

—
5
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
6
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
7
Dallas Regional Chamber

Together, with our business leaders and community partners, we will help lead the dallas region to become the best place in the united states for all people to live, work, and do business.

—
8
Texas Association of Business

As the state chamber of commerce, tab is the most influential and dominant voice for public policy issues affecting business in texas. through proven results-oriented advocacy and member services, tab develops a climate in texas which…

—
9
Texas Trees Foundation

The mission of texas trees foundation is to improve the health of cities and people through the transformative power of trees.

—
10
Dallas Bar Association

The Dallas Bar Association is a nonprofit corporation chartered by the State of Texas to protect and advance the professional interests of persons licensed to practice law in the Dallas area, to improve the relations between the Bench, the…

—
11
Dallas Seminary Foundation

To support the mission of Dallas Theological Seminary by offering charitable planned giving and other related services to friends of the Seminary.

Education
12
Downtown Dallas Inc Foundation

Downtown Dallas, Inc. Foundation is the charitable arm of Downtown Dallas, Inc. whose purpose is to help make the area in and around Downtown Dallas a more vibrant and livable place for both daytime and permanent residents by promoting the…

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Dallas Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Morning Star Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

99 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 99 of the 187 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
17
Early backer (in before they grew)
98/99
Grantees still filing
76/99
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER DALLAS INC: $221,000 · OtherSENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER DALLAS INCFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF DALLAS: $117,100 · OtherFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF DALLASTHE STEWPOT ALLIANCE: $87,640 · OtherTHE STEWPOT ALLIANCETHE SALVATION ARMY: $80,500 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN: $79,450 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTINIndividual grant recipient: $70,000 · OtherLA FIESTA DE LAS SEIS BANDERAS INC: $51,250 · Other+124 more: $750,664 · Other+124 moreSouthern Methodist University: $406,383 · EducationSouthern Methodist Uni…HIGHLAND PARK ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $91,500 · EducationHIGHLAND PARK ISD EDUC…HIGHLAND PARK CHEERLEADING BOOSTER CLUB: $27,000 · EducationTHE GEORGE W BUSH FOUNDATION: $25,000 · EducationHIGHLAND PARK SPORTS CLUB: $20,000 · Education+7 more: $22,700 · EducationTHE CRYSTAL CHARITY BALL: $390,000 · PhilanthropyTHE CRYSTAL CHARITY…KERSHAW'S CHALLENGE: $70,000 · PhilanthropyKERSHAW'S CHALLENGETHE DALLAS FOUNDATION: $17,000 · Philanthropy+9 more: $29,500 · Philanthropy+9 moreINTERFAITH FAMILY SERVICES: $119,500 · Human ServicesCHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC: $27,000 · Human ServicesSalesmanship Club Charitable Golf of Dallas Inc: $10,000 · Human Services+6 more: $5,750 · Human ServicesAMERICAN PRAIRIE FOUNDATION: $115,000 · EnvironmentDALLAS ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC: $16,350 · Environment+1 more: $250 · EnvironmentDALLAS THEATER CENTER: $50,250 · Arts & CultureTHE BETTER ANGELS SOCIETY INC: $24,000 · Arts & CultureDallas Museum of Art: $9,000 · Arts & CulturePRESERVATION PARK CITIES: $6,000 · Arts & CultureDallas Holocaust and Human Rights Museum: $5,000 · Arts & Culture+5 more: $3,145 · Arts & CultureCHILDREN'S HEALTH SYSTEM OF TEXAS: $17,200 · HealthBaylor Health Care System Foundation: $13,750 · HealthMAYO CLINIC: $5,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $3,750 · HealthKIDNEYTEXAS INC: $3,000 · HealthMAMMOGRAM POSTER GIRLS INC: $2,500 · Health+4 more: $3,350 · Health
Other$1,457,604Education$592,583Philanthropy$506,500Human Services$162,250Environment$131,600Arts & Culture$97,395Health$48,550

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSouthern Methodist University: $406,383 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CRYSTAL CHARITY BALL: $390,000 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetSENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER DALLAS INC: $221,000 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetINTERFAITH FAMILY SERVICES: $119,500 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetAMERICAN PRAIRIE FOUNDATION: $115,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetHIGHLAND PARK ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $91,500 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetKERSHAW'S CHALLENGE: $70,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetLA FIESTA DE LAS SEIS BANDERAS INC: $51,250 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetDALLAS THEATER CENTER: $50,250 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTEXAS DISCOVERY GARDENS: $36,000 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF SOUTH TEXAS INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC: $27,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetHIGHLAND PARK CHEERLEADING BOOSTER CLUB: $27,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetGoodwill Industries of Dallas Inc: $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GEORGE W BUSH FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BETTER ANGELS SOCIETY INC: $24,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHIGHLAND PARK SPORTS CLUB: $20,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEALTH SYSTEM OF TEXAS: $17,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDALLAS WOMANS CLUB: $17,100 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE DALLAS FOUNDATION: $17,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNEW FRIENDS NEW LIFE: $16,600 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCAFE MOMENTUM: $16,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetDALLAS ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC: $16,350 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $16,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBaylor Health Care System Foundation: $13,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHWESTERN DIABETIC FOUNDATION INC: $12,750 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTEXAS STATE HISTORY MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetDallas Museum of Art: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTexas 2036: $7,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPRESERVATION PARK CITIES: $6,000 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetAMERICAN HUMANE ASSOCIATION: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRevive Texas Ministries Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetTWELFTH STEP MINISTRY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetChoral Arts Collective Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetDallas Holocaust and Human Rights Museum: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WEST TEXAS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTexas Appleseed: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSNOWBOARDERS & SKIERS FOR CHRIST: $5,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetVolunteerNow: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE UNITED WAY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD AFFAIRS COUNCIL OF DALLAS/FORT WORTH: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDALLAS ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $4,750 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWoodall Rodgers Park Foundation: $4,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCAMP SUMMIT INC: $4,175 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Southern Methodist University ↗
  • Who funds THE CRYSTAL CHARITY BALL ↗
  • Who funds SENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER DALLAS INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERFAITH FAMILY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN PRAIRIE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HIGHLAND PARK ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KERSHAW'S CHALLENGE ↗
  • Who funds LA FIESTA DE LAS SEIS BANDERAS INC ↗
  • Who funds DALLAS THEATER CENTER ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS DISCOVERY GARDENS ↗
  • Who funds GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF SOUTH TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC ↗
  • Who funds HIGHLAND PARK CHEERLEADING BOOSTER CLUB ↗
  • Who funds Goodwill Industries of Dallas Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE GEORGE W BUSH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE BETTER ANGELS SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds HIGHLAND PARK SPORTS CLUB ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HEALTH SYSTEM OF TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds DALLAS WOMANS CLUB ↗
  • Who funds THE DALLAS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NEW FRIENDS NEW LIFE ↗
  • Who funds CAFE MOMENTUM ↗
  • Who funds DALLAS ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Texas Instruments FoundationTX40.2× affinity27 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Texas Instruments Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · The Dallas Foundation · The Addy Foundation · Hillcrest Foundation · The David B Miller Family Foundation · Perkins-Prothro Foundation · The Eugene McDermott Foundation · The Hoglund Foundation · Theodore and Beulah Beasley Foundation Inc · Meadows Foundation Inc · The Moody Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hegi Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hegi Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
22report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 187 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hegi Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph