· Private foundation
Hecht-Levi Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k36 grants · $131k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $136k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $250k
- $250k+3 grants · $821k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BALTIMORE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA | $285,000 |
| JHU BERMAN INSTITUTE OF BIOETHICS | $280,000 |
| JHU PEABODY INSTITUTE | $256,000 |
| ASSOCIATED JEWISH COMMUNITY | $75,000 |
| ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE | $75,000 |
| WORLD JEWISH CONGRESS | $50,000 |
| ACLU OF NATIONAL CAPITAL AREA | $50,000 |
| MARYLAND INSTITUTE COLLEGE OF ART | $30,000 |
| LIVING CLASSROOM FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| BALTIMORE MUSEUM OF ART | $21,000 |
| JEWISH MUSEUM OF MARYLAND | $13,000 |
| TACF | $12,500 |
| PARK SCHOOL OF BALTIMORE | $12,000 |
| The New School | $12,000 |
| CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 98% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against -4% for the ones you funded once.
49 repeat relationships — 41 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $163k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BSBALTIMORE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC6× · 2019–2024 · $1.7M · revenue +82%
- TPTHE PARK SCHOOL OF BALTIMORE INC6× · 2019–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +24%
- LCLIVING CLASSROOMS FOUNDATION5× · 2019–2024 · $85k · revenue +28%
Funded once
- ACAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIAone grant, 2019 · $252k · revenue -18%
- IRInternational Rescue Committee INCone grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -4%
- TWTHE WOLFSONIAN-FIUone grant, 2022 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.
The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…
As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.
Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship
Mcdaniel college is a diverse student-centered community committed to excellence in the liberal arts & sciences and professional studies with careful mentoring and attention to the individual. mcdaniel changes lives. we challenge students…
The mission of the brooklyn institute of arts and sciences, d/b/a brooklyn museum (the "museum") is to bring people together through art and experiences that inspire celebration, compassion, courage, and the will to act. (see schedule o).
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Everyman Theatre Inc and the most unlike its peers is International Rescue Committee Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 54 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
44 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 44 of the 65 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BALTIMORE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
- Who funds THE PARK SCHOOL OF BALTIMORE INC ↗
- Who funds Marlboro School of Music Inc ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ↗
- Who funds BALTIMORE MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds Maryland Institute ↗
- Who funds LIVING CLASSROOMS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds CENTER STAGE ASSOCIATES INC ↗
- Who funds CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ADELPHI UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL AQUARIUM INC ↗
- Who funds CREATIVE ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds JEWISH MUSEUM OF MARYLAND INC ↗
- Who funds THE AMERICAN VISIONARY ART MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS SCHOOL OF BALTIMORE INC ↗
- Who funds CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds INSTITUTE FOR ISLAMIC CHRISTIAN AND JEWISH STUDIES INC ↗
- Who funds THE UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL MARYLAND INC ↗
- Who funds US LACROSSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE REASON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds VERDE VALLEY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds MARYLAND ACADEMY OF SCIENCES ↗
- Who funds GREATER BALTIMORE CULTURAL ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds MARYMOUNT MANHATTAN COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds Trevor Day School ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND EXPRESSION INC ↗
- Who funds SHRIVER HALL CONCERT SERIES INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Baltimore Community Foundation Inc · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · France-Merrick Foundation Inc · Eliasberg Family Foundation Inc · The Jacob and Hilda Blaustein Foundation Inc · The Joseph Meyerhoff Fund Inc · The John J Leidy Foundation Inc · The Bunting Family Foundation · Patricia and Mark Joseph Shelter Foundation Inc · The William G Baker Jr Memorial Fund · T Rowe Price Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Hecht-Levi Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Northbay Education Inc — 28% of income from government
- Boston Medical Center Corporation — 23% of income from government
- Jubilee Baltimore Inc — 16% of income from government
- Everyman Theatre Inc — 15% of income from government
- Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
- Baltimore Symphony Orchestra Inc — 11% of income from government
- Maryland Academy of Sciences — 9% of income from government
- Shriver Hall Concert Series Inc — 9% of income from government
- Living Classrooms Foundation — 7% of income from government
- Center Stage Associates Inc — 7% of income from government
- The American Visionary Art Museum Inc — 6% of income from government
- Greater Baltimore Cultural Alliance Inc — 5% of income from government
- Mount Auburn Hospital — 5% of income from government
- Baltimore Museum of Art — 4% of income from government
- Chesapeake Bay Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
- Jewish Museum of Maryland Inc — 2% of income from government
- The United Way of Central Maryland Inc — 2% of income from government
- National Aquarium Inc — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Hecht-Levi Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Hecht-Levi Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.