· Private foundation
Eliasberg Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k49 grants · $132k
- $10k–50k19 grants · $309k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $120k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Associated Jewish Federation of Baltimore | $70,000 |
| JHU Bloomberg School of Public Health | $50,000 |
| Jewish Federation of Palm Beach County | $30,000 |
| Chesapeake Bay Foundation | $30,000 |
| Ludwig Center Johns Hopkins Medicine | $25,000 |
| Baltimore SquashWise | $25,000 |
| American Technion Society | $25,000 |
| National Park Foundation | $20,000 |
| Admirals Cove Foundation | $18,000 |
| Mt Washington Pediatric Hospital | $15,000 |
| Nature Conservency - Florida | $13,000 |
| Loggerhead Marinelife Center | $13,000 |
| LifeFlight of Maine | $12,500 |
| Living Classrooms Foundation | $12,500 |
| Promise Fund of Florida | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +48% since the first grant, against +25% for the ones you funded once.
80 repeat relationships — 59 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $36k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MWMt Washington Pediatric Hospital Inc6× · 2020–2025 · $206k · revenue +24%
- BSBALTIMORE SQUASHWISE INC6× · 2020–2025 · $150k · revenue +221%
- TATHE ASSOCIATED JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF BALTIMORE INC2× · 2021–2022 · $140k · revenue +8%
Funded once
- AJAssociated Jewish Community Federation of Baltoone grant, 2020 · $78k
- CECarol Eliasberg Martin Scholarship Johns Hopkinsone grant, 2020 · $25k
- MWMt Washington Pediatric Hospital Capital Campaignone grant, 2022 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Associated Jewish Community Federation of Baltimore Inc and the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 52 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
99 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 99 of the 155 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Mt Washington Pediatric Hospital Inc ↗
- Who funds CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds BALTIMORE SQUASHWISE INC ↗
- Who funds THE ASSOCIATED JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF BALTIMORE INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ADMIRALS COVE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Jupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ARCHIVES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LOGGERHEAD MARINELIFE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds DYSLEXIA TUTORING PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds MARYLAND ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds PROMISE FUND OF FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH MUSEUM OF MARYLAND INC ↗
- Who funds MARYLAND ACADEMY OF SCIENCES ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds INDEPENDENT COLLEGE FUND OF MARYLAND INC ↗
- Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds THE BUSCH WILDLIFE SANCTUARY INC ↗
- Who funds GEORGES POND ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds The Society of the Four Arts Inc ↗
- Who funds MALTZ JUPITER THEATRE INC ↗
- Who funds Furry Friends Humane Inc ↗
- Who funds Jupiter Medical Center Inc ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Baltimore Community Foundation Inc · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · France-Merrick Foundation Inc · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · Middendorf Foundation Inc · The Joseph Meyerhoff Fund Inc · The Bunting Family Foundation · The Henry and Ruth Blaustein Rosenberg Foundation Inc · The John J Leidy Foundation Inc · David & Barbara B Hirschhorn Foundation Inc · T Rowe Price Foundation · The Abell Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Eliasberg Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Baltimore Tree Trust Inc — 100% of income from government
- Parks and People Inc — 43% of income from government
- Boston Medical Center Corporation — 23% of income from government
- Baltimore Squashwise Inc — 23% of income from government
- The House of Ruth Maryland Inc — 19% of income from government
- Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
- The Maryland Food Bank Inc — 11% of income from government
- Baltimore Symphony Orchestra Inc — 11% of income from government
- Maryland Historical Society Inc — 9% of income from government
- Maryland Academy of Sciences — 9% of income from government
- Shriver Hall Concert Series Inc — 9% of income from government
- Planned Parenthood of South Florida and the Treasure Coast Inc — 6% of income from government
- The American Visionary Art Museum Inc — 6% of income from government
- Martha's Vineyard Preservation Trust Inc — 4% of income from government
- Baltimore Museum of Art — 4% of income from government
- Maryland Zoological Society Inc — 3% of income from government
- Chesapeake Bay Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
- Jupiter Medical Center Inc — 2% of income from government
- Jewish Museum of Maryland Inc — 2% of income from government
- The United Way of Central Maryland Inc — 2% of income from government
- The Associated Jewish Community Federation of Baltimore Inc — 1% of income from government
- Center for Hope Inc — 1% of income from government
- Arts for Learning Maryland Inc — 1% of income from government
- National Aquarium Inc — 1% of income from government
- Goucher College — 0% of income from government
- Sinai Hospital of Baltimore Inc — 0% of income from government
- Planned Parenthood of Maryland Inc — 0% of income from government
- Gilchrist Hospice Care Inc — 0% of income from government
- Mt Washington Pediatric Hospital Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Eliasberg Family Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Eliasberg Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.