Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Heart of Gold Legacy Foundation Formerly Solid Gold Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$10k
Granted FY2022
18
Grants FY2022
2
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0160% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2022.

Animals$85kHuman Services$30kHealth$5kPublic Safety & Disaster$3kOther$81k
02FY2022 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$500
Median grant
2
States reached
$6.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SURRENDERED SOULS RESCUE INC$1,000
LEASHES 4 LIFE INT'L ASSISTANCE DOG$1,000
EL CAJON ANIMAL CENTER FOR EDUC SER$500
WAGGING DOG RESCUE$500
PREVENTING EUTHANASIA THROUGH RESCU$500
LUCKY PUP DOG RESCUE$500
FERAL CAT COALITION$500
CAT CANINE ASSISTANCE REFERRAL EDUC$500
PET PRESCRIPTION TEAM$500
BOSTON BUDDIES INC$500
2ND CHANCE DOG RESCUE INC$500
SANTA CRUZ SPCA HUMANE SOCIETY$500
ANIMAL FRIENDS RESCUE PROJECT$500
ANIMAL WELFARE FOUNDATION$500
ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE OF ST FRANCIS$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 75% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ANIMAL FRIENDS RESCUE PROJECT: $2k → 12%WARRIOR CANINE CONNECTION INC: $1k → 8%ANIMAL FRIENDS RESCUE PROJECT: $1k → 12%ANIMAL FRIENDS RESCUE PROJECT: $500 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$186k · 59 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +17% since the first grant, against -9% for the ones you funded once.

59 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2022, 45 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

59
12

Total granted

$186k
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
-9%

Still filing today

61%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
AnimalsHuman ServicesHealthPublic Safety & DisasterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC
    3× · 2017–2021 · $12k · revenue +86%
  • CC
    CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $11k · revenue +76%
  • DF
    DOGS FOR THE DEAF INC DBA DOGS FOR BETTER LIVES
    2× · 2017–2018 · $6k · revenue +72%

Funded once

  • AD
    ANIMAL DONATION ADVOCATE INC DBA VIDA-DBA 4PATAS
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue -72%
  • SS
    SACRAMENTO SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALSgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue +79%
  • KP
    K-9 PLACEMENT AND ASSISTANCE LEAGUE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue +76%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
St Clouds Rescue
Animals
2
Pets Without Partners

Find homes for homeless/abandoned dogs. Provide full vet car and housing while awaiting adoption,

Animals
3
The Adoptable Dog
Animals
4
Asian Dogs Rescue Allies

To rescue at risk k-9s from asia.

Animals
5
Shelters and Shelves Rescue Inc

foster based dog rescue working with shelters to save dogs

Animals
6
Donna's Love Pet Rescue
Animals
7
Desert Dog Rescue Inc

Animal rescue

Animals
8
Hope Fur Paws Rescue

To help injured, abandoned and unwanted animals. We provide food, vet care that includes heartworm prevention and spay or neuter services, shelter and anything else needed.

Animals
9
Their Lives Matter

Dog rescue and care nurturing finding a home

Animals
10
Raskels Rescue
Animals
11
Rescue Coop
Animals
12
Animal Rescue and Adoption Agency Inc

An animal rescue/adoption Agency. Rescued animals are from kill shelters or owner surrenders facing hardship then rehabbed/medical completed while in foster care then adopted into loving homes.

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Canine Support Teams Inc and the most unlike its peers is Border Collies in Need. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number25%0%<5yr16%0%5–10yr20%36%10–20yr17%38%20–35yr11%16%35–55yr12%11%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value25%0%<5yr16%0%5–10yr20%27%10–20yr17%32%20–35yr11%25%35–55yr12%16%55yr+

The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
4%2/57
the rest of the field
14%
18,984/130,955

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

48 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 48 of the 75 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
43/48
Grantees still filing
27/48
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

DOGS FOR THE DEAF INC DBA DOGS FOR BETTER LIVES — $6,000 · AnimalsDOGS FOR THE DEAF INC DBA DOGS FOR BETTER LIVESFERAL CAT COALITION — $4,000 · AnimalsSAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY AND SPCA — $4,000 · AnimalsSECOND CHANCE 4 PETS — $3,500 · AnimalsNORTHERN CALIFORNIA ANIMAL RESCUE FRIENDS — $3,500 · AnimalsBOSTON BUDDIES INC — $3,500 · AnimalsPets Lifeline Inc — $3,000 · AnimalsAnimal Welfare Foundation — $3,000 · AnimalsLEAVE NO PAWS BEHIND INC — $3,000 · AnimalsSaint Bernard Rescue Foundation Inc — $3,000 · Animals+25 more — $48,300 · Animals+25 moreEL CAJON ANIMAL CENTER FOR EDUC SER — $7,500 · OtherEL CAJON ANIMAL CENTER FOR EDUC SERSURRENDERED SOULS RESCUE INC — $6,000 · OtherSURRENDERED SOULS RESCUE INCGUIDE DOGS OF THE DESERT — $6,000 · OtherGUIDE DOGS OF THE DESERTPREVENTING EUTHANASIA THROUGH RESCU — $4,000 · OtherLEASHES 4 LIFE INTERNATIONAL ASSITANCE DOGS — $3,500 · OtherHOPALONG ANIMAL RESCUE — $3,000 · OtherIND LABRADOR RETRIEVER RESCUE SOCAL — $3,000 · OtherCAT CANINE ASSISTANCE REFERRAL EDUC — $3,000 · Other+25 more — $44,500 · Other+25 moreGUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC — $11,500 · Human ServicesGUIDE DOGS FOR T…CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC — $11,000 · Human ServicesCANINE COMPANION…CANINE SUPPORT TEAMS INC — $3,500 · Human ServicesCANINE SUPPORT T…Animal Friends Rescue Project — $3,000 · Human ServicesAnimal Friends R…WARRIOR CANINE CONNECTION INC — $1,000 · Human ServicesPET PRESCRIPTION TEAM — $4,500 · HealthSANTA CLARA COUNTY SEARCH AND RESCUE INCORPORATED — $2,500 · Public Safety & Disaster
Animals$84,800Other$80,500Human Services$30,000Health$4,500Public Safety & Disaster$2,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC — $11,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC — $11,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDOGS FOR THE DEAF INC DBA DOGS FOR BETTER LIVES — $6,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGUIDE DOGS OF THE DESERT — $6,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPET PRESCRIPTION TEAM — $4,500 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetFERAL CAT COALITION — $4,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetSAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY AND SPCA — $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND CHANCE 4 PETS — $3,500 over 3y, 8.8% of budgetNORTHERN CALIFORNIA ANIMAL RESCUE FRIENDS — $3,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBOSTON BUDDIES INC — $3,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCANINE SUPPORT TEAMS INC — $3,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetPets Lifeline Inc — $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHOPALONG ANIMAL RESCUE — $3,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAnimal Welfare Foundation — $3,000 over 4y, 12% of budgetAnimal Friends Rescue Project — $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLEAVE NO PAWS BEHIND INC — $3,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHERAPY DOGS OF SANTA BARBARA INC — $2,500 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetDOG ADOPTION AND WELFARE GROUP — $2,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCARE4Paws Inc — $2,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSANTA CLARA COUNTY SEARCH AND RESCUE INCORPORATED — $2,500 over 3y, 9.7% of budgetSHELTER PET PARTNERS INC — $2,500 over 3y, 10% of budgetGOLDEN GATE LABRADOR RETRIEVER RESCUE INC — $2,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetGREYHOUND ADOPTION CENTER — $2,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetAnimal Place — $2,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHomeless Animal Rescue Team — $2,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetAnimal Welfare Assistance Group — $2,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetHELEN WOODWARD ANIMAL CENTER — $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRANCHO COASTAL HUMANE SOCIETY — $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJoybound People and Pets FKA Tony La Russa's Animal Rescue Foundation — $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSouthern California German Shepherd Rescue Inc — $2,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetNorthern California Sled Dog Rescue — $2,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCALIFORNIA ANIMAL RESCUE INC — $2,000 over 2y, 4.8% of budgetWildcat Ridge Sanctuary — $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSan Francisco Samoyed Rescue Inc — $2,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetGERMAN SHEPHERD SAFE HAVEN INC — $2,000 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetSAVE A SMALL DOG RESCUE INC — $2,000 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetSanta Cruz SPCA and Humane Society — $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBORDER COLLIES IN NEED — $2,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetANIMAL DONATION ADVOCATE INC DBA VIDA-DBA 4PATAS — $1,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSACRAMENTO SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetK-9 PLACEMENT AND ASSISTANCE LEAGUE INC — $1,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetPaws Helping People Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetDogs on Deployment — $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetStar Paws Rescue Foundation — $1,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetWARRIOR CANINE CONNECTION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLABRADOR RESCUERS — $300 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Thornton S Jr and Kat…The Duffield Family F…The Intuit FoundationGreater Good CharitiesThe Michelson Found A…Ethel Frends Charitab…Hope for PawsThe Winnick Family Fo…Mary Jo and Hank Gree…Sempra FoundationPetsmart Charities IncPedigree Foundation
Thornton S Jr and Katrina D Glide FoundationCA27.4× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Thornton S Jr and Katrina D Glide Foundation · The Duffield Family Foundation Dba Maddie's Fund · The Intuit Foundation · Greater Good Charities · The Michelson Found Animals Foundation Inc · Ethel Frends Charitable Foundation · Hope for Paws · The Winnick Family Foundation Inc · Mary Jo and Hank Greenberg Animal Welfare Foundation · Sempra Foundation · Petsmart Charities Inc · Pedigree Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Heart of Gold Legacy Foundation Formerly Solid Gold Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Warrior Canine Connection Inc — 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 75 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines