Skip to content
Healthy Communities Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Healthy Communities Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$9.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
118
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$368k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Health$16MHuman Services$10MCommunity Improvement$5.2MCivil Rights$4.5MYouth Development$2.7MPhilanthropy$2.3MHousing & Shelter$1.5MArts & Culture$1.2MOther$0
02FY2024 · 118 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k12 grants · $39k
  • $10k–50k32 grants · $995k
  • $50k–250k73 grants · $8.0M
  • $250k+1 grant · $368k
$60,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$117M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FOREFRONT$368,000
ERIE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE$220,250
GADS HILL CENTER$220,000
INNER-CITY MUSLIM ACTION NETWORK$220,000
ENLACE CHICAGO$220,000
MUJERES LATINAS EN ACCION$220,000
ALIVIO MEDICAL CENTER$220,000
ARAB AMERICAN FAMILY SERVICES$220,000
BUILD INC$220,000
BRIGHTON PARK NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL$220,000
ESPERANZA HEALTH CENTER$220,000
LATINOS PROGRESANDO$220,000
PILLARS COMMUNITY HEALTH$212,965
CHICAGO COMMUNITY TRUST$200,000
EQUAL HOPE$200,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $10.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PASO WEST SUBURBAN ACTION PROJECT: $80k → 14%SARAH'S INN: $90k → 14%ERIE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $220k → 14%ERIE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $201k → 14%ERIE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $201k → 14%ERIE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $200k → 14%ERIE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $200k → 14%ERIE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $100k → 14%CORAZON COMMUNITY SERVICES: $90k → 14%UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY SEGUIN OF GREATER CHICAGO: $85k → 14%FAMILY FOCUS: $120k → 14%FAMILY FOCUS: $90k → 14%NEW MOMS INC: $91k → 14%FAMILY FOCUS: $90k → 14%FAMILY FOCUS: $90k → 14%NEW MOMS INC: $81k → 14%FAMILY FOCUS: $90k → 14%NEW MOMS INC: $80k → 14%NEW MOMS INC: $80k → 14%ARAB AMERICAN FAMILY SERVICES: $200k → 14%MUJERES LATINAS EN ACCION: $251k → 14%MUJERES LATINAS EN ACCION: $220k → 14%GADS HILL CENTER: $220k → 14%MUJERES LATINAS EN ACCION: $203k → 14%MUJERES LATINAS EN ACCION: $202k → 14%MUJERES LATINAS EN ACCION: $202k → 14%GADS HILL CENTER: $201k → 14%GADS HILL CENTER: $200k → 14%GADS HILL CENTER: $200k → 14%GADS HILL CENTER: $200k → 14%MUJERES LATINAS EN ACCION: $165k → 14%MUJERES LATINAS EN ACCION: $165k → 14%MUJERES LATINAS EN ACCION: $165k → 14%MUJERES LATINAS EN ACCION: $143k → 14%INSTITUTE FOR LATINO PROGRESS: $129k → 14%INSTITUTE FOR LATINO PROGRESS: $128k → 14%INSTITUTE FOR LATINO PROGRESS: $126k → 14%MUJERES LATINAS EN ACCION: $125k → 14%GADS HILL CENTER: $100k → 14%INSTITUTE FOR LATINO PROGRESS: $100k → 14%ARAB AMERICAN FAMILY SERVICES: $220k → 14%ARAB AMERICAN FAMILY SERVICES: $201k → 14%ARAB AMERICAN FAMILY SERVICES: $200k → 14%ARAB AMERICAN FAMILY SERVICES: $200k → 14%ARAB AMERICAN FAMILY SERVICES: $100k → 14%UCAN: $95k → 14%UCAN: $91k → 14%UCAN: $90k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$44M · 112 repeat orgs$1.5M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +61% since the first grant, against +28% for those funded once.

112 repeat relationships: 85 still active in FY2024, 27 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

112
38

Total granted

$44M
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+61%
+28%

Still filing today

82%
61%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $453k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ML
    MUJERES LATINAS EN ACCION
    6× · 2019–2024 · $2.1M · revenue +97%
  • IC
    ILLINOIS COALITION FOR IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE RIGHTS
    6× · 2019–2024 · $1.5M · revenue +497%
  • AM
    ALIVIO MEDICAL CENTER INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $1.5M · revenue +61%

Funded once

  • UC
    URBAN COMMUNITY ARTS NETWORK LTD
    one grant, 2020 · $101k
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO INC
    one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue -50%
  • University of Chicago
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +21%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chicago United for Equity

Connecting and amplifying the power of individuals to build a just, equitable, and inclusive city.

Civil Rights
2
Live Free Chicago

Live Free Illinois is a statewide organization partnering with over 120 congregations and directly impacted individuals to build safer more equitable communities across Illinois. Operating at the intersection of criminal justice reform and…

—
3
A Better Chicago

A better chicago is changing how chicago fights poverty by investing in bold ideas that create opportunity for our youth.

Human Services
4
Latino Union of Chicago

Latino Union works to defend the rights and dignity of contingent workers, including the right to immigrate, work, live free of oppression and violence, and provide for oneself and one's family.

Human Services
5
Chicago Coalition to End Homelessness

Chicago Coalition to End Homelessness (CCH) builds community power and advances racial equity through organizing, advocacy, legal assistance, and education to prevent and end homelessness because housing is a human right.

Housing & Shelter
6
Community Health Partnership of Illinois

Strive to improve the health and well being of migrant and seasonal farmworkers and other medically vulnerable populations by providing quality accessable, affordable, and culturally responsive health care within the community we serve.

Health
7
Alternatives Inc

Alternatives, inc.'s mission is to facilitate personal development,strengthen family relationships and enhance the community's well being. serving over 3,000 youth and families annually, the organization offers a range of counseling and…

Health
8
Chicago Refugee Coalition

The Chicago Refugee Coalition is a 501c3 non-profit organization dedicated ot the alleviation of human suffering through innovative partnerships, advocacy and community empowerment.

Human Services
9
Chicago Children's Advocacy Center

The chicago children's advocacy center unites public, private, and community partners to ensure the safety, health, and well-being of abused children.

Crime & Legal
10
Chicago Torture Justice Center

Seeks to address the traumas of police violence and institutionalized racism through access to healing and wellness services, trauma-informed resources, and community connection. The Center is a part of and supports a movement to end all…

Crime & Legal
11
Infant Welfare Society of Chicago

Infant welfare society of chicago (iws) (d/b/a iws family health) provides quality medical, dental and behavioral health services for the health, physical and mental development of children and their families in the chicagoland community.

—
12
The Network Advocating Against Domestic Violence

The Network is a group of 40+ member organizations dedicated to improving the lives of those impacted by gender-based violence through education, public policy and advocacy, and connecting community members with direct service providers.…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Health and Medicine Policy Research Group; the most unlike its peers is Working Bikes. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

130 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 130 of the 167 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
41
Early backer (in before they grew)
130/130
Grantees still filing
98/130
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BUILD INC: $1,126,000 · OtherBUILD INCCOMMUNITYHEALTH: $1,045,103 · OtherCOMMUNITYHEALTHLATINO POLICY FORUM: $1,001,761 · OtherLATINO POLICY FORUMYOUTH CROSSROADS INC: $870,500 · OtherFAMILY SERVICE & MENTAL HEALTH CENTER OF CICERO: $757,500 · OtherCHICAGO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $750,000 · OtherBEDS PLUS INC: $722,067 · OtherSINAI URBAN HEALTH INSTITUTE: $581,000 · OtherLatinos Progresando: $827,500 · OtherSHRIVER CENTER ON POVERTY LAW: $663,500 · Other+74 more: $8,452,633 · Other+74 moreALIVIO MEDICAL CENTER INC: $1,508,526 · HealthALIVIO MEDICAL CENTER INCPILLARS COMMUNITY HEALTH: $1,203,965 · HealthPILLARS COMMUNITY HEALTHESPERANZA HEALTH CENTERS: $1,152,000 · HealthESPERANZA HEALTH CENTERSEqual Hope: $1,026,000 · HealthEqual HopeHEALTHCARE ALTERNATIVE SYSTEMS INC: $844,887 · HealthHEALTHCARE ALTERNATIVE SY…NAMI METRO-SUBURBAN INC: $813,460 · HealthNAMI METRO-SUBURBAN INCMICHAEL REESE HEALTH TRUST: $625,000 · HealthMICHAEL REESE HEALTH TRUS…PCC COMMUNITY WELLNESS CENTER: $590,000 · HealthPCC COMMUNITY WELLNESS CE…HEALTH AND MEDICINE POLICY RESEARCH GROUP: $458,068 · HealthACCESS COMMUNITY HEALTH NETWORK: $430,000 · HealthErie Family Health Foundation Inc: $430,000 · HealthOak Park River Forest Infant Welfare S: $390,000 · HealthTHE LATINO ALZHEIMERS AND MEMORY DISORDERS ALLIANCE: $362,270 · Health+9 more: $598,840 · Health+9 moreMUJERES LATINAS EN ACCION: $2,127,497 · Human ServicesMUJERES LATINAS EN ACCIO…ARAB AMERICAN FAMILY SERVICES: $1,130,500 · Human ServicesARAB AMERICAN FAMILY SER…ERIE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $1,129,900 · Human ServicesERIE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSEGADS HILL CENTER: $1,128,100 · Human ServicesGADS HILL CENTERFAMILY FOCUS LEGACY: $540,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY FOCUS LEGACYINSTITUTE FOR LATINO PROGRESS: $483,000 · Human ServicesNEW MOMS INC: $465,250 · Human ServicesAGING CARE CONNECTIONS: $395,089 · Human Services+22 more: $2,572,250 · Human Services+22 moreEnlace Chicago: $1,226,000 · Community ImprovementEnlace Chic…INNER-CITY MUSLIM ACTION NETWORK: $1,192,500 · Community ImprovementINNER-CITY …BRIGHTON PARK NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL: $975,208 · Community ImprovementBRIGHTON PA…SOUTHWEST ORGANIZING PROJECT: $505,250 · Community ImprovementSOUTHWEST O…CHICAGO CARES INC: $345,000 · Community ImprovementCHICAGO CAR…+4 more: $386,500 · Community Improvement+4 moreILLINOIS COALITION FOR IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE RIGHTS: $1,514,700 · Civil RightsCHICAGO COMMUNITY AND WORKERS RIGHTSNFP: $160,000 · Civil RightsBLACKROOTS ALLIANCE: $95,000 · Civil RightsAustin Coming Together: $375,000 · EducationLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $290,000 · EducationCenter for Independence through Conductive Education Inc: $280,000 · EducationChicago Workers' Collaborative NFP: $160,000 · EducationAdler University: $153,500 · EducationEquiticity: $111,000 · EducationUniversity of Chicago: $100,000 · EducationGARDENEERS: $65,000 · EducationSCALELIT FKA CHICAGO CITYWIDE LITERACY COALITION: $64,000 · Education+5 more: $100,435 · EducationThe Chicago Community Trust: $875,000 · PhilanthropyFOREFRONT: $453,500 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO INC: $100,000 · Philanthropy+2 more: $45,414 · Philanthropy
Other$16,797,564Health$10,433,016Human Services$9,971,586Community Improvement$4,630,458Civil Rights$1,769,700Education$1,698,935Philanthropy$1,473,914

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMUJERES LATINAS EN ACCION: $2,127,497 over 6y, 8.8% of budgetILLINOIS COALITION FOR IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE RIGHTS: $1,514,700 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetALIVIO MEDICAL CENTER INC: $1,508,526 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetEnlace Chicago: $1,226,000 over 6y, 3.1% of budgetPILLARS COMMUNITY HEALTH: $1,203,965 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetINNER-CITY MUSLIM ACTION NETWORK: $1,192,500 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetESPERANZA HEALTH CENTERS: $1,152,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetARAB AMERICAN FAMILY SERVICES: $1,130,500 over 6y, 6.0% of budgetERIE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $1,129,900 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetGADS HILL CENTER: $1,128,100 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetBUILD INC: $1,126,000 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetEqual Hope: $1,026,000 over 6y, 16% of budgetLATINO POLICY FORUM: $1,001,761 over 6y, 11% of budgetBRIGHTON PARK NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL: $975,208 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetThe Chicago Community Trust: $875,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYOUTH CROSSROADS INC: $870,500 over 6y, 13% of budgetHEALTHCARE ALTERNATIVE SYSTEMS INC: $844,887 over 6y, 2.7% of budgetLatinos Progresando: $827,500 over 6y, 5.3% of budgetNAMI METRO-SUBURBAN INC: $813,460 over 6y, 14% of budgetFAMILY SERVICE & MENTAL HEALTH CENTER OF CICERO: $757,500 over 6y, 9.4% of budgetBEDS PLUS INC: $722,067 over 6y, 9.1% of budgetSHRIVER CENTER ON POVERTY LAW: $663,500 over 6y, 2.9% of budgetMICHAEL REESE HEALTH TRUST: $625,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetPCC COMMUNITY WELLNESS CENTER: $590,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetFAMILY FOCUS LEGACY: $540,000 over 6y, 7.0% of budgetLAWNDALE CHRISTIAN HEALTH CENTER: $530,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetSOUTHWEST ORGANIZING PROJECT: $505,250 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR LATINO PROGRESS: $483,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetEL VALOR CORPORATION: $468,200 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetNEW MOMS INC: $465,250 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetHEALTH AND MEDICINE POLICY RESEARCH GROUP: $458,068 over 5y, 5.7% of budgetFOREFRONT: $453,500 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetACCESS COMMUNITY HEALTH NETWORK: $430,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetErie Family Health Foundation Inc: $430,000 over 4y, 9.3% of budgetLegal Council for Health Justice: $420,000 over 6y, 2.7% of budgetAGING CARE CONNECTIONS: $395,089 over 6y, 3.5% of budgetOak Park River Forest Infant Welfare S: $390,000 over 4y, 5.1% of budgetAustin Coming Together: $375,000 over 6y, 2.8% of budgetTHE LATINO ALZHEIMERS AND MEMORY DISORDERS ALLIANCE: $362,270 over 6y, 6.4% of budgetTHE WEST COOK YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATIONS INC: $352,480 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetCHICAGO CARES INC: $345,000 over 4y, 4.4% of budgetHOUSING FORWARD: $335,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetSARAH'S INN: $330,000 over 6y, 2.3% of budgetCASA CENTRAL SOCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION: $327,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetTHE WAY BACK INN INC: $309,975 over 6y, 4.4% of budgetUCAN: $307,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetILLINOIS PARTNERS FOR HUMAN SERVICE: $291,000 over 6y, 13% of budgetLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $290,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MUJERES LATINAS EN ACCION ↗
  • Who funds ILLINOIS COALITION FOR IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE RIGHTS ↗
  • Who funds ALIVIO MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Enlace Chicago ↗
  • Who funds PILLARS COMMUNITY HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds INNER-CITY MUSLIM ACTION NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds ESPERANZA HEALTH CENTERS ↗
  • Who funds ARAB AMERICAN FAMILY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds ERIE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds GADS HILL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds BUILD INC ↗
  • Who funds Equal Hope ↗
  • Who funds LATINO POLICY FORUM ↗
  • Who funds BRIGHTON PARK NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds The Chicago Community Trust ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH CROSSROADS INC ↗
  • Who funds HEALTHCARE ALTERNATIVE SYSTEMS INC ↗
  • Who funds Latinos Progresando ↗
  • Who funds NAMI METRO-SUBURBAN INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY SERVICE & MENTAL HEALTH CENTER OF CICERO ↗
  • Who funds BEDS PLUS INC ↗
  • Who funds SHRIVER CENTER ON POVERTY LAW ↗
  • Who funds MICHAEL REESE HEALTH TRUST ↗
  • Who funds PCC COMMUNITY WELLNESS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY FOCUS LEGACY ↗
  • Who funds LAWNDALE CHRISTIAN HEALTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWEST ORGANIZING PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR LATINO PROGRESS ↗
  • Who funds EL VALOR CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds NEW MOMS INC ↗
  • Who funds HEALTH AND MEDICINE POLICY RESEARCH GROUP ↗
  • Who funds FOREFRONT ↗
  • Who funds ACCESS COMMUNITY HEALTH NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds Erie Family Health Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Legal Council for Health Justice ↗
  • Who funds AGING CARE CONNECTIONS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Metropo…Polk Bros Foundation …The Chicago Community…Robert R McCormick Fo…John D and Catherine …Field Foundation of I…Circle of Service Fou…Oak Park-River Forest…Community Memorial Fo…Visiting Nurse Associ…Michael Reese Health …Lloyd a Fry Foundation
United Way of Metropolitan Chicago IncIL115.9× affinity62 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · Polk Bros Foundation Inc · The Chicago Community Trust · Robert R McCormick Foundation · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · Field Foundation of Illinois · Circle of Service Foundation · Oak Park-River Forest Community Foundation · Community Memorial Foundation · Visiting Nurse Association of Chicago (Aka) Vna Foundation · Michael Reese Health Trust · Lloyd a Fry Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Healthy Communities Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Healthy Communities Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    51report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Healthy Communities Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Healthy Communities Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 167 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Healthy Communities’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home