Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Head Family Charitable Foundation 5507-19-44

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
82
Grants FY2024still arriving
13
States reached
$115k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.

Health$2.1MInternational$1.2MCivil Rights$652kEnvironment$525kFood & Nutrition$445kAnimals$348kHuman Services$294kArts & Culture$265kOther$0
02FY2024 · 82 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k22 grants · $98k
  • $10k–50k55 grants · $1.2M
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $370k
$15,000
Median grant
13
States reached
$26M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Brigham and Women's Hospital$115,000
Brain & Behavior Research Foundation$95,000
Compassion & Choices$60,000
Direct Relief International$50,000
World Central Kitchen Inc$50,000
Center for Reproductive Rights$49,000
International Anti-Poaching Foundation$45,000
Committee to Protect Journalists Inc$40,000
Nurturing Minds Inc$40,000
International Rescue Committee$40,000
International Medical Corps$40,000
Community Food Bank of New Jersey$40,000
Doctors Without Borders USA$40,000
Population Council Inc$35,000
Morristown Memorial Health Foundation$35,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $337k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 76% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Border Solidarity: $10k → 15%Rethink Priorities: $10k → 10%Spectrum for Living Development Inc: $10k → 7%Rethink Priorities: $10k → 10%Spectrum for Living Development Inc: $5k → 7%Rethink Priorities: $10k → 10%Spectrum for Living Development Inc: $3k → 7%Border Solidarity: $5k → 14%Spectrum for Living Development Inc: $2k → 7%The Summit Area YMCA: $25k → 10%The Summit Area YMCA: $15k → 10%The Connection for Women and Families: $15k → 10%The Summit Area YMCA: $15k → 10%Furnishing Hope of Massachusetts Inc: $10k → 8%The Summit Area YMCA: $10k → 10%Furnishing Hope of Massachusetts Inc: $10k → 8%Furnishing Hope of Massachusetts Inc: $10k → 8%Furnishing Hope of Massachusetts Inc: $10k → 8%Madison Area YMCA: $10k → 4%Madison Area YMCA: $10k → 4%Henry Street Settlement: $25k → 17%Henry Street Settlement: $25k → 17%Henry Street Settlement: $25k → 17%Henry Street Settlement: $15k → 17%Innocence Project Inc: $10k → 17%Innocence Project Inc: $6k → 17%Innocence Project Inc: $5k → 17%The Brigid Alliance: $21k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
IL
WI
NY
MA
OR
IA
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
VA
MD
AZ
NC
DC
HI
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$6.1M · 71 repeat orgs$479k to everyone else

71 repeat relationships — 63 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

71
28

Total granted

$6.1M
$336k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+27%

Still filing today

86%
79%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $143k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
AnimalsInternationalHuman ServicesHealthEnvironmentEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NA
    NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR RESEARCH ON SCHIZOPHRENIA AND DEPRESSION
    4× · 2021–2024 · $380k · revenue +51%
  • CC
    COMPASSION & CHOICES
    4× · 2021–2024 · $290k · revenue +40%
  • OF
    OVERLOOK FOUNDATION
    4× · 2021–2024 · $215k · revenue +15%

Funded once

  • PA
    POPULATION ACTION INTERNATIONAL
    one grant, 2021 · $35k · revenue -59%
  • The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $30k · revenue -9%
  • INTERNATIONAL FUND FOR ANIMAL WELFARE INC
    one grant, 2022 · $30k · revenue -7%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
2
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
3
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
4
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
5
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
6
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
7
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
8
The Global FoodBanking Network

To nourish the world's hungry through uniting and advancing food banks.

International
9
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
10
Wildaid Inc

Wildaid's mission is to inspire change and empower the world to protect wildlife and vital habitats from critical threats.

Animals
11
Waterorg

Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.

International
12
Project Hope - the People-to-People Health Foundation Inc

To conduct and support programs and activities aimed at solving some of the world's greatest public health challenges, with a specific focus on enabling health workers to have the greatest possible impact on the health of the people they…

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Global Fund for Women Inc and the most unlike its peers is Dogs and Cats of Antigua-Us Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFood Banks and PantriesCommunity FoundationsPolicy Research and AdvocacyAffordable Housing Developm…Environmental Conservation …Ymca Youth DevelopmentSenior Support ServicesIndependent K-12 SchoolsYouth Sports ProgramsChristian Missionary Organi…Orchestra and Ensemble Perf…Developmental Disabilities …Addiction Recovery ServicesCommunity Arts CentersVolunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Pregnancy Support ServicesJewish Community Organizati…Animal Rescue and Shelter
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr14%6%5–10yr19%17%10–20yr16%21%20–35yr13%33%35–55yr16%21%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%2%5–10yr19%22%10–20yr16%20%20–35yr13%38%35–55yr16%19%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/97
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,468

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

94 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 94 of the 112 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
94/94
Grantees still filing
58/94
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED — $470,000 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATEDNATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR RESEARCH ON SCHIZOPHRENIA AND DEPRESSION — $380,000 · OtherNATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR RESEARCH ON SCHIZOPHRENIA A…St Hubert's Animal Welfare Center — $178,300 · OtherSt Hubert's Animal Welfare CenterMorristown Memorial Health Foundation — $175,000 · OtherMorristown Memorial Health FoundationGuttmacher Institute Inc — $130,000 · OtherNURTURING MINDS INC — $197,500 · OtherNURTURING MINDS INC+47 more — $1,380,000 · Other+47 moreDIRECT RELIEF — $190,000 · InternationalDIRECT RELIEFMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $190,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIER…International Rescue Committee INC — $185,000 · InternationalInternational Rescue C…WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $153,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN …INTERNATIONAL PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION WESTERN HEMISPHERE REGION — $135,000 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL PLANNED …THE POPULATION COUNCIL INC — $130,000 · InternationalTHE POPULATION COUNCIL…INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS — $130,000 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL …GLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC — $100,000 · InternationalGLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN …WORLD RESOURCES INSTITUTE — $47,000 · International+3 more — $69,500 · InternationalOVERLOOK FOUNDATION — $215,000 · HealthOVERLOOK FO…RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY CARE INC — $190,000 · HealthRIVERSIDE C…The Fistula Foundation — $130,000 · HealthThe Fistula…PLANNED PARENTHOOD LEAGUE OF MASSACHUSETTS INC — $45,000 · HealthPLANNED PAR…POPULATION ACTION INTERNATIONAL — $35,000 · HealthSummit Volunteer First Aid Squad Inc — $25,000 · Health+4 more — $41,000 · Health+4 moreCOMPASSION & CHOICES — $290,000 · Civil RightsCOMPASSION…THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC — $174,000 · Civil RightsTHE CENTER…COMMITTEE TO PROTECT JOURNALISTS INC — $130,000 · Civil RightsCOMMITTEE …FOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND EXPRESSION INC — $23,400 · Civil Rights+1 more — $15,000 · Civil RightsAKASHINGA INC — $170,000 · AnimalsCENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC — $55,000 · AnimalsINTERNATIONAL FUND FOR ANIMAL WELFARE INC — $30,000 · AnimalsBROOKLYN BRIDGE ANIMAL WELFARE COALITION — $26,000 · AnimalsANIMAL HAVEN INC — $23,300 · Animals+10 more — $66,000 · AnimalsCommunity Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc — $140,000 · Food & NutritionCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS — $103,000 · Food & NutritionCITY HARVEST INC — $50,000 · Food & NutritionNEWTON FOOD PANTRY INC — $32,000 · Food & NutritionMAUI FOOD BANK INC — $17,000 · Food & Nutrition+1 more — $10,000 · Food & NutritionHENRY STREET SETTLEMENT — $90,000 · Human ServicesSUMMIT AREA YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION A NJ NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $65,000 · Human ServicesFURNISHING HOPE OF MASSACHUSETTS INC — $40,000 · Human ServicesRethink Priorities — $30,000 · Human ServicesTHE BRIGID ALLIANCE INC — $21,000 · Human ServicesTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC — $21,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF MADISON NJ — $20,000 · Human ServicesSPECTRUM FOR LIVING DEVELOPMENT INC — $19,500 · Human ServicesBORDER SOLIDARITY — $15,000 · Human ServicesTHE CONNECTION FOR WOMEN AND FAMILIES — $15,000 · Human Services+1 more — $7,500 · Human Services
Other$2,910,800International$1,329,500Health$681,000Civil Rights$632,400Animals$370,300Food & Nutrition$352,000Human Services$344,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR RESEARCH ON SCHIZOPHRENIA AND DEPRESSION — $380,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetCOMPASSION & CHOICES — $290,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetOVERLOOK FOUNDATION — $215,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetNURTURING MINDS INC — $197,500 over 4y, 3.1% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF — $190,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $190,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRIVERSIDE COMMUNITY CARE INC — $190,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $185,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC — $174,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAKASHINGA INC — $170,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $153,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc — $140,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION WESTERN HEMISPHERE REGION — $135,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetGuttmacher Institute Inc — $130,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE POPULATION COUNCIL INC — $130,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMITTEE TO PROTECT JOURNALISTS INC — $130,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetThe Fistula Foundation — $130,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS — $130,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS — $103,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetGLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC — $100,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHENRY STREET SETTLEMENT — $90,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAVENUES FOR JUSTICE INC — $75,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetAMERICAN REPERTORY THEATRE CO INC — $75,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC — $70,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSUMMIT AREA YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION A NJ NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $65,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC — $65,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMadison Montessori School — $65,000 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetEVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC — $64,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NEW YORK TIMES COMMUNITIES FUND — $55,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetFROM THE TOP INC — $55,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NEW JERSEY — $55,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC — $55,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CLEAR FUND — $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC — $50,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBRIGHTER GREEN INC — $49,500 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetWORLD RESOURCES INSTITUTE — $47,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD LEAGUE OF MASSACHUSETTS INC — $45,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFURNISHING HOPE OF MASSACHUSETTS INC — $40,000 over 4y, 6.2% of budgetGreat Swamp Watershed Association — $40,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetPOPULATION ACTION INTERNATIONAL — $35,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNEWTON FOOD PANTRY INC — $32,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetCOALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC — $32,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetRethink Priorities — $30,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc — $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL FUND FOR ANIMAL WELFARE INC — $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR DISASTER PHILANTHROPY INC — $29,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBROOKLYN BRIDGE ANIMAL WELFARE COALITION — $26,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Investors Foundation …The Hyde and Watson F…The Summit FoundationCommunity Foundation …Ej Grassmann TrustAmerican Gift FundBristol-Myers Squibb …George M and Pamela S…Citizens Philanthropi…American Express Foun…The Pfizer Foundation…Gs Donor Advised Phil…
Investors Foundation IncNJ22.6× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Investors Foundation Inc · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · The Summit Foundation · Community Foundation of New Jersey · Ej Grassmann Trust · American Gift Fund · Bristol-Myers Squibb Foundation Inc · George M and Pamela S Humphrey Fund · Citizens Philanthropic Foundation Inc · American Express Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Head Family Charitable Foundation 5507-19-44 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 100%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • Riverside Community Care Inc — 58% of income from government
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc — 22% of income from government
  • New Jersey Festival Orchestra — 13% of income from government
  • Trustees of Tufts College — 13% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
  • From the Top Inc — 6% of income from government
  • Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts Inc — 3% of income from government
  • Reeves - Reed Arboretum — 1% of income from government
  • Sage Eldercare — 1% of income from government
  • Young Men's Christian Association of Madison Nj — 1% of income from government
  • American Repertory Theatre Co Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
10get no government money at all
19report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Head Family Charitable Foundation 5507-19-44?

Find your warmest path to Head Family Charitable Foundation 5507-19-44 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 112 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines