Skip to content
Hazen Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Hazen Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
41
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02Its granteesRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Education$502kArts & Culture$393kHealth$370kHuman Services$196kHousing & Shelter$160kYouth Development$109kEmployment$100kRecreation & Sports$60kOther$0
02FY2024 · 41 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 41 grants below total $1,016,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,194,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $177,500 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $42k
  • $10k–50k26 grants · $455k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $520k
$15,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$8.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Cleveland Clinic Foundation$200,000
The Smith Center for the Performing Arts$100,000
Committee on the Shelterless$60,000
Committee on the Shelterless$60,000
REDF$50,000
University of Arizona Foundation$50,000
Sam Miguel High School$40,000
Scholarship Foundation of Santa Barbara$30,000
Holualoa Foundation for Arts and Culture$25,000
Santa Barbara Bowl Foundation$25,000
Fox Tucson Theatre Foundation$25,000
SPL Sports Inc$25,000
Angel Charity for Children Inc$25,000
Art Council Inc$25,000
Intermountain Centers for Human Development Inc$22,500
02Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 24 repeat orgs$673k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
16

Total granted

$1.5M
$203k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+52%

Still filing today

88%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $470k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’24
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    COMMITTEE ON THE SHELTERLESS
    3× · 2021–2024 · $320k · revenue +139%
  • R
    REDF
    2× · 2022–2024 · $100k · revenue +53%
  • MH
    MONTAGE HEALTH FOUNDATION
    2× · 2021–2022 · $100k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • SM
    San Miguel of Tuscon Corporation
    one grant, 2022 · $30k
  • AC
    Angel Charity for Childern, Inc.
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
  • SF
    SEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +17%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arizona Community Foundation

To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.

Philanthropy
2
Community Foundation Santa Cruz County

To promote philanthropy to make santa cruz county a better place to live, now and in the future.we bring together people, ideas, and resources to inspire philanthropy and accomplish great things.

Philanthropy
3
Uc Santa Barbara Foundation

The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…

Education
4
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
5
Santa Fe Community Foundation

The santa fe community foundation inspires philanthropic generosity, strengthens nonprofits, and fosters positive change to build a more vibrant, healthy, and resilient region. the foundation's vision is a thriving northern new mexico,…

Philanthropy
6
The Foundation for Santa Barbara City College

The sbcc foundation fuels the excellence of santa barbara city college by engaging the community, building relationships, and inviting the generosity of donors. the resources raised and managed by the foundation enrich college programs,…

Education
7
Ymca of Southern Arizona

Ymca of southern arizona is dedicated to improving the quality of human life and helping all people realize their fullest potential through the development of spirit, mind and body. we are a powerful association of men, women and children,…

Human Services
8
Opera Santa Barbara

See schedule 0founded in 1994, opera santa barbara is the signature provider of professional opera on the california central coast. we aspire to be a cultural leader in the santa barbara region, voicing and advancing our community's spirit…

Arts & Culture
9
Silicon Schools Fund Inc

The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…

Education
10
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
11
Social Venture Partners Tucson

Svp tucson is an ever expanding community of engaged philanthropists dedicated to building the capacity, strength and impact of nonprofits in addressing social problems. we accomplish this through: thoughtful and strategic investments and…

Philanthropy
12
Silicon Valley Education Foundation

Who we are - silicon valley education foundation (svef) focuses on raising student performance in the critical areas of math and science across all 33 santa clara county school districts, and also adjoining san mateo and alameda counties.…

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Santa Barbara Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Lapan Memorial Sunshine Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
40/40
Grantees still filing
28/40
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMMITTEE ON THE SHELTERLESS: $320,000 · OtherCOMMITTEE ON THE SHELTERLESSThe Cleveland Clinic Foundation: $200,000 · OtherThe Cleveland Clinic FoundationSan Miguel High School: $80,000 · OtherSan Miguel High SchoolSCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION OF SANTA BARBARA: $70,000 · OtherSCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION OF SANTA BARBARASam Miguel High School: $55,000 · Other+25 more: $364,250 · Other+25 moreUniversity of Arizona Foundation: $100,000 · EducationUniversity of…Santa Barbara Education Foundation: $100,000 · EducationSanta Barbara…SANTA BARBARA PARTNERS IN EDUCATION: $60,000 · EducationSANTA BARBARA…Teach for America Inc: $10,000 · EducationThe Smith Center for the Performing Arts: $100,000 · Arts & CultureThe Smith …ACOMPAS INC DBA FLAMENCO SANTA BARBARA: $30,000 · Arts & CultureACOMPAS IN…HOLUALOA FOUNDATION FOR ARTS & CULTURE: $25,000 · Arts & CultureHOLUALOA F…FOX TUCSON THEATRE FOUNDATION: $25,000 · Arts & CultureFOX TUCSON…SANTA BARBARA ARTS COLLABORATIVE INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureNAKOA FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $10,000 · Arts & CultureINTERMOUNTAIN CENTERS FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INC: $70,000 · Human ServicesINTERMOUNT…Angel Charity for Children Inc: $65,000 · Human ServicesAngel Char…YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $50,000 · Human ServicesYOUTH ON T…ANGELS FOSTER CARE OF SANTA BARBARA: $15,000 · Human ServicesANGELS FOS…+1 more: $6,250 · Human ServicesREDF: $100,000 · PhilanthropyREDFARTCOUNCIL INC DBA ARTADIA: $75,000 · PhilanthropyARTCOUNCI…SANTA BARBARA FOUNDATION: $10,000 · PhilanthropyTHE JIM SAUNDERS FUND: $6,500 · PhilanthropyMONTAGE HEALTH FOUNDATION: $100,000 · HealthSEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND: $25,000 · HealthSANTA BARBARA BOWL FOUNDATION: $75,000 · Recreation & SportsSPL SPORTS INC: $50,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$1,089,250Education$270,000Arts & Culture$210,000Human Services$206,250Philanthropy$191,500Health$125,000Recreation & Sports$125,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMITTEE ON THE SHELTERLESS: $320,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetREDF: $100,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetUniversity of Arizona Foundation: $100,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMONTAGE HEALTH FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSanta Barbara Education Foundation: $100,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetThe Smith Center for the Performing Arts: $100,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetARTCOUNCIL INC DBA ARTADIA: $75,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetSANTA BARBARA BOWL FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetINTERMOUNTAIN CENTERS FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INC: $70,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION OF SANTA BARBARA: $70,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetAngel Charity for Children Inc: $65,000 over 2y, 8.6% of budgetSANTA BARBARA PARTNERS IN EDUCATION: $60,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetSPL SPORTS INC: $50,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetYOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $50,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCALM INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetACOMPAS INC DBA FLAMENCO SANTA BARBARA: $30,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetHOLUALOA FOUNDATION FOR ARTS & CULTURE: $25,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetTHE GREGORY SCHOOL: $25,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFOX TUCSON THEATRE FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA: $20,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF TUCSON INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWilderness Youth Project Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetANGELS FOSTER CARE OF SANTA BARBARA: $15,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetSpecial Operations - Finding Kids: $10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetSANTA BARBARA ARTS COLLABORATIVE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetTeach for America Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA BARBARA FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAKOA FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 49% of budgetMOXI THE WOLF MUSEUM OF EXPLORATION INNOVATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLandPaths: $7,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE JIM SAUNDERS FUND: $6,500 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetTHE CERES COMMUNITY PROJECT: $6,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSonoma County Black Forum: $6,250 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetTUCSON CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC DBA CHILDREN'S MUSEUM TUCSON: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetVOLCANO ART CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF CALIFORNIA'S CENTRAL COAST: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF ARIZONA: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAPAN MEMORIAL SUNSHINE FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ann Jackson Family Fo…Marin Community Found…Hutton Foundation Dba…Alice Tweed Tuohy Fou…Williams-Corbett Foun…Community Foundation …Santa Barbara Foundat…California Community …Tony and Kyra Rogers …Latkin Charitable Fou…June G Outhwaite Char…James S Bower Foundat…
Ann Jackson Family FoundationCA24× affinity9 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ann Jackson Family Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · Hutton Foundation Dba Hutton Parker Foundation · Alice Tweed Tuohy Foundation · Williams-Corbett Foundation · Community Foundation for Southern Arizona · Santa Barbara Foundation · California Community Foundation · Tony and Kyra Rogers Foundation · Latkin Charitable Foundation · June G Outhwaite Charitable Trust JS Poucher KL Englert & CM Cooney Co-Tr · James S Bower Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Hazen Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Hazen Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $1.4M of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hazen Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home