· Private foundation
Hayworth Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k5 grants · $24k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $218k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $153k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WEST END MINISTRIES | $52,500 |
| THE COMMUNITY CLINIC OF HIGH POINT INC | $50,500 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER | $50,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF GREATER HIGH POINT | $48,500 |
| MACEDONIA FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER | $45,000 |
| SENIOR RESOURCES OF GUILFORD | $42,500 |
| THE SALVATION ARMY OF HIGH POINT | $27,500 |
| NAAMAN'S RECOVERY VILLAGE INC | $27,500 |
| THE ARC OF HIGH POINT INC | $27,000 |
| ADULT CENTER FOR ENRICHMENT DBA | $7,500 |
| THE PRESBYTERIAN HOMES FDN INC | $5,000 |
| NEPAL ORPHANS HOME | $5,000 |
| HEROES CENTER INC | $3,500 |
| THE ADA JENKINS CENTER | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $402k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
26 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WEWEST END MINISTRIES6× · 2018–2024 · $269k · revenue +350%
- ODOPEN DOOR MINISTRIES OF HIGH POINT INC4× · 2018–2022 · $232k · revenue +145%
- CCCOMMUNITY CLINIC OF HIGH POINT INC6× · 2018–2024 · $178k · revenue +63%
Funded once
- MHMENTAL HEALTH ASSOC OF HIGH POINTone grant, 2023 · $30k
- HPHIGH POINT UNIVERSITYgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +81%
- HFHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF HIGH POINTone grant, 2020 · $8k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Chapel pointe at carlisle is a continuing care retirement community of the christian and missionary alliance and is for persons of all faiths. our mission is to provide comfortable retirement living and quality care and service to each…
Habitat for Humanity of High Point, Archdale and Trinity is an ecumenical Christian movement whose goal is to build safe, decent, affordable homes for our neighbors in need. Through conscience and action, Habitat utilizes volunteer labor…
Pittsboro Christian Village is a caring and compassionate continuing care retirement community for the Lord's people during their senior years. We provide our resident's spiritual and physical well-being, guided by biblical principles to…
Our mission is to relieve suffering and improve the quality and dignity of life through compassionate hospice care at the end of life, palliative care for those with advanced illness, and through community education.
Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors
Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors
Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors.
Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors
Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors
The mission of WNC Lighthouse Inc is Changing lives, by being a light for Christ our Lord. Our vision is To be fully devoted to Jesus Christ, by opening our arms and providing Christian services to the underseved children, adults and…
Provied temporary and emergency and low income housing and secured shelter.
Low-rent government assisted housing for the elderly.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Service of the Piedmont Inc and the most unlike its peers is Nepal Orphans Home Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WEST END MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds OPEN DOOR MINISTRIES OF HIGH POINT INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY CLINIC OF HIGH POINT INC ↗
- Who funds MACEDONIA FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER I ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER HIGH POINT INC ↗
- Who funds SENIOR RESOURCES OF GUILFORD ↗
- Who funds THE ARC OF HIGH POINT INC ↗
- Who funds NAAMANS RECOVERY VILLAGE INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY SERVICE OF THE PIEDMONT INC ↗
- Who funds Adult Center for Enrichment Inc ↗
- Who funds HOSPICE OF THE PIEDMONT INC ↗
- Who funds NEPAL ORPHANS HOME INC ↗
- Who funds CHARLOTTE RESCUE MISSION ↗
- Who funds Ada Jenkins Families and Careers Development Center Inc ↗
- Who funds PRESBYTERIAN HOMES INC ↗
- Who funds Heroes Center Inc ↗
- Who funds HIGH POINT UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Presbyterian Homes Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds Children's Home Society of North Carolina Inc ↗
- Who funds SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF NORTHWEST NC INC ↗
- Who funds ROOF ABOVE INC ↗
- Who funds STRING & SPLINTER CLUB THE CITY CLUB OF HIGH POINT INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Apat & Kathryne Lbrown Foundation · Earl and Kathryn Congdon Family Foundation · The Ann G and Vann York Foundation · The Clark Foundation Inc · McInnis Family Foundation · Lenny Peters Foundation Inc · High Point Community Foundation · Tannenbaum-Sternberger Foundation Inc · The Leon Levine Foundation · The Cannon Foundation Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · The Sink and Mickey Family Foundation F/K/A the Mickey Truck Bodies Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Hayworth Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Hayworth Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Hayworth Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.