· Private foundation
Hathaway Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k60 grants · $99k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $202k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $178k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MILLBROOK COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP | $100,000 |
| DLC | $77,500 |
| WEATHERSFIELD FOUNDATION | $35,150 |
| AHTF | $34,125 |
| HITCHCOCK WOODS FOUNDATION | $26,500 |
| ASPEN COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL | $25,000 |
| DUTCHESS DAY SCHOOL | $25,000 |
| BERKSHIRE TACONIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $16,000 |
| WILDLIFE CONSERVATION SOCIETY | $10,000 |
| CITY SQUASH | $10,000 |
| MILLBROOK HORSE TRIALS | $10,000 |
| UNITED STATES EQUISTRIAN TEAM | $10,000 |
| CARY INSTITUTE | $6,300 |
| HARTLAND YOUTH SCHOLARS | $5,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $313k) land where the poverty rate runs at 27%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +43% since the first grant, against +27% for the ones you funded once.
119 repeat relationships — 66 still active in FY2024, 53 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MCMILLBROOK COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP INC3× · 2022–2024 · $300k · revenue +13%
- DDDUTCHESS DAY SCHOOL8× · 2017–2024 · $242k · revenue +12%
- TTTHE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE5× · 2017–2023 · $176k · revenue +52%
Funded once
- DLDUTCHESS LAND CONSERVANCY INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +49%
- AFASSOCIATION FOR CHILDREN WITH DOWN SYNDROMEone grant, 2021 · $15k
- HYHARTFORD YOUTH SCHOLARS INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +95%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
See schedule onylcv is a non-partisan policy making and political action organization that works to make environmental protection a top priority with elected officials, decision-makers and the voters by evaluating incumbent performance and…
Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.
The wildlands trust works throughout southeastern massachusetts to conserve and permanently protect native habitats, farmland, and lands of high ecologic and scenic value that serve to keep our communities healthy and our residents…
Run wild supports land conservation and stewardship in the hudson valley by organizing running races and conducting other fundraising activities.
Adk is the only non-profit organization in new york state dedicated to the conservation, preservation, and responsible recreational use of the new york state forest preserve and other parks, wild lands, and waters vital to our members and…
Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…
To preserve the unique character and natural resources of harvard.
See schedule onylcvef's mission is to educate, engage and empower new yorkers to be effective advocates on behalf of the environment from clean energy and funding for parks, to solid waste and green buildings. first, we educate new yorkers…
Our mission is to act to conserve threatened species and ecosystems worldwide, choosing solutions that are sustainable, based on sound science and take into account human needs.
Preserving and enhancing the habitat of wildlife, such as sandhill cranes, waterfowl, raptors, which habitat expenses are supported by agricultural activities.
The zoological society of pittsburgh is dedicated to being a leader in, and significant contributor to, the conservation of endangered and threatened species. the society provides an enjoyable family experience that fosters understanding,…
The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundations of the Hudson Valley Inc and the most unlike its peers is Wethersfield Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
83 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 83 of the 179 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MILLBROOK COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds DUTCHESS DAY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds HITCHCOCK WOODS FOUNDATION THE ↗
- Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds WETHERSFIELD FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN HORSE TRIALS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CARY INSTITUTE OF ECOSYSTEM STUDIES INC ↗
- Who funds BERKSHIRE TACONIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MILLBROOK SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds THE ASPEN COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds PANTHERA CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Wildlife Conservation Society ↗
- Who funds City Squash Inc ↗
- Who funds DUTCHESS LAND CONSERVANCY INC ↗
- Who funds MILLBROOK HORSE TRIALS INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHEAST COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds BALLETCOLLECTIVE INC ↗
- Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
- Who funds THOROUGHBRED RETIREMENT FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER NEW YORK INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Berkshire Taconic Community Foundation Inc · Community Foundations of the Hudson Valley Inc · The George Whalen Jr Fdtn Inc · The Dyson Foundation · The Tcherepnine Foundation Inc · Anna Carolina and Soo Kim Foundation · The Pamela Howard Family Foundation Inc · The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals · Millbrook Tribute Garden · The Vincent and Carol W Dean Family Charitable Foundation · Pm Foundation Inc · The Warburg Pincus Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Hathaway Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Berkshire Taconic Community Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
- The Trustees of the Smith College — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Hathaway Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Hathaway Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.