· Private foundation
Haslam Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k16 grants · $35k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $75k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $115k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY | $65,000 |
| CONGREGATION OF THE ORATORY | $50,000 |
| ST FRANCIS CENTER | $20,000 |
| BENEDICTINE | $15,000 |
| REAL CHAMPIONS | $10,000 |
| MERCY MISSION | $10,000 |
| JEFF SMITH CANCER TREATMENT | $10,000 |
| LB3 FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| PREGNANCY CENTER | $5,000 |
| JOHN KOLBUS CUPIDS ARROW | $5,000 |
| SC HUNTER FOR THE HUNGRY | $5,000 |
| LOWCOUNTRY FOUNDATION FOR WOUNDED M | $5,000 |
| NAVY SEAL ( HERO ONTHE BLUFF) | $2,500 |
| EQUINOX GLOBAL MISSIONS | $2,500 |
| SBEF | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $31k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
20 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $65k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LFLOWCOUNTRY FOUNDATION FOR WOUNDED MILITARY HEROS2× · 2024–2025 · $9k · revenue +5%
- SVSAINT VINCENT COLLEGE4× · 2021–2025 · $4k · revenue +14%
- PFPOCKETS FULL OF SUNSHINE2× · 2022–2023 · $4k · revenue +46%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2024 · $25k
- WOWAYMAKER OFF-ROAD WHEELCHAIRS INCone grant, 2024 · $21k · revenue -18%
- SBSt Benedict Education Foundationone grant, 2021 · $20k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Southern outdoor dreams is a family-based nonprofit organization with a mission to positively impact the lives of disabled/critically-ill youth and combat-disabled veterans by providing hunting and fishing dream adventures.
Dream makers outdoors, inc. is committed to enriching lives by providing unforgettable hunting and fishing experiences to individuals and families who may not otherwise have the opportunity to enjoy the outdoors. through fellowship,…
Wildlife Preservation
Warfighter Outfitters believe in the healing power of the outdoors. Since 2014, we have provided free fishing, hunting, and engagement trips to disabled veterans. On the water or in the woods, these veteran-only trips help service men and…
We have no paid employees, our soul purpose is to raise money for military veterens
Leading the conservation, sound management, and wise use of tennessee's wildlife and great outdoors, tennessee wildlife federation advocates sound natural resource policies and provides various educational programs that promote the…
To provide support, encouragement, and comradery to our military heroes and their families.
Helping handicapped hunters enjoy the great outdoors
Dazzle africa's mission is to partner with local organizations to provide programs in conservation, education and community development. the organization aims to ensure that future generations are self-sufficient and iconic african…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lowcountry Foundation for Wounded Military Heros and the most unlike its peers is Low Country Game Bird Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 10% of your grantees by number, and just 22% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WAYMAKER OFF-ROAD WHEELCHAIRS INC ↗
- Who funds St Francis Center Inc ↗
- Who funds REAL CHAMPIONS INC ↗
- Who funds LOWCOUNTRY FOUNDATION FOR WOUNDED MILITARY HEROS ↗
- Who funds THE OUTDOOR DREAM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds S C HUNTERS AND LANDOWNERS FOR THE HUNGRY ↗
- Who funds SAINT VINCENT COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds HANDS OF A SPORTSMAN INC ↗
- Who funds POCKETS FULL OF SUNSHINE ↗
- Who funds BELOVED EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Lowcountry · Bass Pro Shops & Cabelas Outdoor Fund · Duke Energy Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Haslam Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Hunters of Color — 4% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.