Skip to content
Harvey & Missy Jabara Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Harvey & Missy Jabara Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$18k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$340kReligion$73kRecreation & Sports$22kPhilanthropy$9kHealth$4kHousing & Shelter$3kHuman Services$1kArts & Culture$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$81
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
St George Orthodox Christian Cathe$10,000
League 42 Foundation$4,200
Spalding Public Library$2,000
Keys to Change$1,000
St George Orthodox Church$720
Sun Devil Club$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Ability360org: $1k → 11%Spalding Public Library: $2k → 11%The Bishops School: $3k → 11%Orthodox Youth Ministries: $5k → 14%Nexus Church: $100 → 5%Butler County Community College: $100 → 8%Central Christian College: $100 → 10%League 42 Foundation: $5k → 16%St Jude Childrens Research Hospital: $250 → 17%St George Orthodox Church: $5k → 9%University of Washington Foundation: $10k → 9%Averett University: $100 → 14%Keys to Change: $1k → 11%Spalding Public Library: $2k → 11%Kathys Legacy Inc: $500 → 11%League 42 Foundation: $4k → 16%St George Orthodox Church: $720 → 9%Unvirsity of Washington Foundation: $5k → 9%Human Services Campus: $1k → 11%Spalding Public Library: $2k → 11%Kathy's Legacy Inc: $500 → 11%League 42 Foundation: $4k → 16%St George Orthodox Church: $560 → 9%Human Services Campus: $1k → 11%Spalding Public Library: $2k → 11%The Fund for Cathedral Catholic: $3k → 11%League 42 Foundation: $4k → 16%St George Orthodox Church: $300 → 9%St George Orthodox Church: $300 → 11%Spalding Public Library: $2k → 11%League 42 Foundation: $4k → 16%St George Orthodox Church: $100 → 11%Spalding Public Library: $2k → 11%Wichita State University: $100 → 16%The Board of Visitors: $2k → 11%Phillips Fundamental Learning Ctr: $100 → 16%The Board of Visitors: $1k → 11%The Lord's Diner: $100 → 16%The Board of Visitors: $1k → 11%Universal Congregational Church: $100 → 16%Botanica The Wichita Gardens: $100 → 16%St George Orthodox Christian Cathed: $10k → 16%St George Orthodox Christian Cathe: $10k → 16%St George Orthodox Christian Cathed: $10k → 16%St George Orthodox Christian Cathe: $10k → 16%St George Orthodox Christian Cathe: $10k → 16%St George Orthodox Christian Cathe: $10k → 16%West Side Eagles Football Program: $100 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IA
CA
NE
VA
AZ
KS
TN
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$320k · 10 repeat orgs$134k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +93% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
23

Total granted

$320k
$134k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+93%
+14%

Still filing today

50%
39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2020–2021 · $210k · revenue +93%
  • L4
    LEAGUE 42 FOUNDATION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $22k · revenue +15%
  • TB
    THE BOARD OF VISITORS
    3× · 2020–2023 · $4k · revenue +103%

Funded once

  • AS
    Arizona State University
    one grant, 2022 · $105k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -7%
  • UO
    Unvirsity of Washington Foundation
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
2
Pacific University

A diverse and sustainable learning community dedicated to discovery and excellence in teaching, scholarship and practice, pacific university inspires students to think, care, create and pursue justice in our world.

Education
3
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
4
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
5
Arcadia University

Arcadia university's pioneering, global, integrated, liberal arts, and professional learning experience cultivates leaders who are intellectually fearless and uniquely prepared for life and work. our highly regarded, values-based learning…

Education
6
Park University

Park university's mission is to transform lives through accessible, student-centered, quality higher education.

Education
7
Ashland University

Ashland university, guided by our christian heritage, is a comprehensive, private university that provides a transformative learning experience, shaping graduates who work, serve and lead with integrity in their local, national, and global…

Education
8
The American College of Trust and Estate Counsel

Enhance the ability of actec members to provide the most efficient and highest quality services to their clients; develop qualified trust and estate counselors; improve and reform probate, trust and tax laws, procedures, and standards of…

Community Improvement
9
University Corporation for Atmospheric Research

See schedule ouniversity corporation for atmospheric research (ucar), on behalf of, and in cooperation with its member university members, is engaged in the management of long-term atmospheric and related research and educational…

Science & Tech
10
The University of Tulsa

The university of tulsa is a student-centered research university that cultivates interconnected learning experiences to explore complex ideas and create new knowledge in a spirit of free inquiry. guided by our commitment to diversity,…

Education
11
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
12
Atlantic University Inc

Provide post-secondary education of excellence.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Averett University; the most unlike its peers is Kathys Legacy Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $210,000 · EducationARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN …UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Education+3 more: $300 · EducationArizona State University: $105,000 · OtherArizona State UniversitySt George Orthodox Christian Cathe: $40,300 · OtherSt George Orthodox Christian CatheSt George Orthodox Christian Cathed: $20,550 · OtherSt George Orthodox Christian CathedSpalding Public Library: $12,000 · OtherSpalding Public LibrarySt George Orthodox Church: $7,360 · Other+15 more: $19,100 · Other+15 moreLEAGUE 42 FOUNDATION: $21,500 · Recreation & SportsTHE BOARD OF VISITORS: $4,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $250 · HealthHuman Services Campus Inc: $3,000 · Housing & ShelterWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $100 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $100 · Human ServicesSUN ANGEL FOUNDATION: $150 · PhilanthropyBOTANICA INC: $100 · Environment
Education$220,300Other$204,310Recreation & Sports$21,500Health$4,250Housing & Shelter$3,000Human Services$200Philanthropy$150Environment$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $210,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLEAGUE 42 FOUNDATION: $21,500 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF VISITORS: $4,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetHuman Services Campus Inc: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKATHYS LEGACY INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUN ANGEL FOUNDATION: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPHILLIPS FUNDAMENTAL LEARNING CENTER INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAVERETT UNIVERSITY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL CHRISTIAN COLLEGE OF KANSAS: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOTANICA INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds LEAGUE 42 FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF VISITORS ↗
  • Who funds Human Services Campus Inc ↗
  • Who funds KATHYS LEGACY INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds SUN ANGEL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PHILLIPS FUNDAMENTAL LEARNING CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds AVERETT UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL CHRISTIAN COLLEGE OF KANSAS ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds BOTANICA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Professor Fran & Geri…American Endowment Fo…The Pfizer Foundation…National Philanthropi…The Bank of America C…Morgan Stanley Global…Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Professor Fran & Geri Jabara Fund IncKS13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Professor Fran & Geri Jabara Fund Inc · American Endowment Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Harvey & Missy Jabara Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Harvey & Missy Jabara Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Harvey & Missy Jabara Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Harvey & Missy Jabara Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Harvey & Missy Jabara Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home