Skip to content

· Private foundation

Harry Plankenhorn Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$347k
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$127k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Employment$1.2MReligion$530kPublic Safety & Disaster$449kYouth Development$239kRecreation & Sports$158kEducation$82kHuman Services$55kFood & Nutrition$40kOther$0
02FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k12 grants · $56k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $108k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $183k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$6.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTH CENTRAL SIGHT SERVI$126,750
AMERICAN RESCUE WORKERS$56,000
SHEPHERD OF THE STREETS$40,000
STEP INC$25,000
RIVER VALLEY YMCA$20,000
SOJOURNER TRUTH MINISTRIES$12,969
SALVATION ARMY$10,000
JAMES V BROWN LIBRARY$7,915
NEW COVENANT UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIS$6,990
DWELL ORPHAN CARE$5,000
UNITED CHURCHES OF LYCOMING COUNTY$5,000
PENN COLLEGE FOUNDATION$5,000
SUSQUEHANNA VALLEY CASA$5,000
RIVER VALLEY YMCA$4,000
RIVER VALLEY YMCA$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NORTH CENTRAL SIGHT SERVI: $202k → 12%NORTH CENTRAL SIGHT SERVI: $178k → 12%NORTH CENTRAL SIGHT SERVI: $174k → 12%NORTH CENTRAL SIGHT SERVI: $151k → 12%NORTH CENTRAL SIGHT SERVI: $131k → 12%NORTH CENTRAL SIGHT SERVI: $127k → 12%NORTH CENTRAL SIGHT SERVI: $127k → 12%NORTH CENTRAL SIGHT SERVI: $125k → 12%HOPE ENTERPRISES: $12k → 12%DWELL ORPHAN CARE: $5k → 12%DWELL ORPHAN CARE: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.7M · 25 repeat orgs$135k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
18

Total granted

$2.7M
$129k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+24%

Still filing today

24%
39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesFood & NutritionHealthCommunity ImprovementRecreation & SportsArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NC
    NORTH CENTRAL SIGHT SERVICES INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +21%
  • JV
    JAMES V BROWN LIBRARY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $47k · revenue +12%
  • FP
    FIRETREE PLACE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $39k · revenue +100%

Funded once

  • WK
    WB KONKLE MEMORIAL LIBRARY
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • WE
    WEST END CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY
    one grant, 2022 · $15k
  • HE
    HOPE ENTERPRISES INC
    one grant, 2023 · $12k · revenue +22%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Center for Community Resources Inc

To coordinate services among private and government agencies for specialized populations to ensure service continuity, reduce duplication, and assist individuals and families in accessing appropriate mental health, intellectual…

Health
2
Thrive Cil

The mission of the center for independent living of central pennsylvania is to eliminate and prevent barriers that people with disabilities experience.

—
3
Goodwill Industries of the Chesapeake Inc

Goodwill industries of the chesapeake, inc. prepares people to secure and retain employment and build successful, independent lives.

—
4
Goodwill Industries of the Valleys Inc

Goodwill's mission is to empower individuals, strengthen families, and inspire communities through job skills training and work placement opportunities with a multi-generational approach focused on removing barriers.

Employment
5
Goodwill Industries of the Valley Works

Goodwill's mission is to empower individuals, strengthen families, and inspire communities through job skills training and work placement opportunities with a multi-generational approach focused on removing barriers.

Human Services
6
Lycoming County Society for Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

Full-service animal shelter, animal care, adoptive services, humane investigaation services and humane education.

Animals
7
Center in the Woods Inc

The center in the woods' mission is to provide the highest quality of life for older adults in southwestern pennsylvania.

—
8
Central Pennsylvania July 4TH Inc

Central pennsylvania july 4th, inc is a non-profit organization comprimised of a team of volunteers and sponsors dedicated to celebrating america's independence with a day of family fun and the best all-volunteer fireworks display in the…

Education
9
Summit Legal Aid

Civil justice for those in need, their homes secured, families protected, and finances fortified.

Crime & Legal
10
The Baptist Home of Philadelphia

The mission of the baptist home of philadelphia is dedicated to providing quality continuing care living facilities and support services in a christian environment respecting the dignity and sanctity of all individuals regardless of their…

Human Services
11
Goodwill Industries of South Central Wisconsin Inc

Goodwill of south central wisconsin's mission is to help people in our community to live, work and thrive through housing, employment and supportive services. see schedule o for continuationsupported employment and job skills training are…

Employment
12
Goodwill Industries of Southeastern Michigan Inc

Goodwill provides exceptional opportunities for people facing employment barriers.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is North Central Sight Services Inc; the most unlike its peers is Community Theatre League Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
11/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN RESCUE WORKERS: $391,369 · OtherAMERICAN RESCUE WORKERSSHEPHERD OF THE STREETS: $337,000 · OtherSHEPHERD OF THE STREETSSALVATION ARMY: $153,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYRIVER VALLEY YMCA: $98,000 · OtherRIVER VALLEY YMCASOJOURNER TRUTH MINISTRIES: $91,237 · OtherSOJOURNER TRUTH MINISTRIESSTEP INC: $57,000 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSS: $52,500 · Other+28 more: $378,462 · Other+28 moreNORTH CENTRAL SIGHT SERVICES INC: $1,213,430 · Human ServicesNORTH CENTRAL SIGHT SERVICES INC+2 more: $22,250 · Human ServicesFIRETREE PLACE: $38,500 · Community ImprovementSusquehanna Health Foundation: $10,000 · HealthEXPECTATIONS WOMENS CENTER: $2,400 · HealthCAMP CADET: $12,000 · Recreation & SportsCENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA FOOD BANK: $5,000 · Food & NutritionTHE NEW LOVE CENTER: $2,000 · Food & NutritionCOMMUNITY THEATRE LEAGUE INC: $4,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,558,568Human Services$1,235,680Community Improvement$38,500Health$12,400Recreation & Sports$12,000Food & Nutrition$7,000Arts & Culture$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNORTH CENTRAL SIGHT SERVICES INC: $1,213,430 over 8y, 2.0% of budgetJAMES V BROWN LIBRARY: $46,906 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetFIRETREE PLACE: $38,500 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetCAMP SUSQUE INC: $38,000 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetHOPE ENTERPRISES INC: $12,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCAMP CADET: $12,000 over 4y, 6.7% of budgetGREATER LYCOMING HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetSusquehanna Health Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetDWELL - LYCOMING COUNTY: $10,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetCENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA FOOD BANK: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNICHOLAS WOLFF FOUNDATIONINC: $2,400 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetEXPECTATIONS WOMENS CENTER: $2,400 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NORTH CENTRAL SIGHT SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds JAMES V BROWN LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds FIRETREE PLACE ↗
  • Who funds CAMP SUSQUE INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE ENTERPRISES INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMP CADET ↗
  • Who funds GREATER LYCOMING HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds Susquehanna Health Foundation ↗
  • Who funds DWELL - LYCOMING COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY THEATRE LEAGUE INC ↗
  • Who funds NICHOLAS WOLFF FOUNDATIONINC ↗
  • Who funds EXPECTATIONS WOMENS CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

First Community Foundation Partnership of PennsylvaniaPA32.3× affinity13 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: First Community Foundation Partnership of Pennsylvania · Abram M Snyder Foundation Inc · Ppl Foundation · The 1994 Charles B Degenstein Fdn · Central Pennsylvania Food Bank · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Harry Plankenhorn Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Harry Plankenhorn Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Harry Plankenhorn Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Harry Plankenhorn Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Harry Plankenhorn’s filings →

    More from the funding graph