Skip to content

· Private foundation

Harold E & Phyllis S Thomas Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
35
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$5.9MHuman Services$1.1MYouth Development$797kEducation$745kHealth$503kInternational$475kCrime & Legal$400kRecreation & Sports$75k
02FY2024 · 35 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k17 grants · $375k
  • $50k–250k17 grants · $1.2M
$40,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$10M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOISE RESCUE MISSION$100,000
Individual grant recipient$90,000
BAREFOOT MEDIA MINISTRY$90,000
MOODY AVIATION$88,040
FELLOWSHP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES$80,000
MISSION AVIATION FELLOWSHIP$80,000
NATIONAL CHRISTIAN COLLEGIATE AA$75,000
LUIS PALAU ASSOC$75,000
YOUTH WITH A MISSION$70,750
YOU GOTTA ASK$65,000
BIBLEWAY INC$65,000
HERITAGE BIBLE CHURCH$60,700
CRU$60,000
PRISON IMPACT MINISTRIES$60,000
LAUNCH PAD MINISTRIES$55,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $203k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%INTERNATIONAL MISSIONARY NETWORK: $53k → 11%INTERNATIONAL MISSIONARY NETWORK: $40k → 11%INTERNATIONAL MISSIONARY NETWORK: $30k → 11%INTERNATIONAL MISSIONARY NETWORK: $20k → 11%INTERNATIONAL MISSIONARY NETWORK: $10k → 11%BECAUSE INTERNATIONAL: $50k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
MT
OR
IN
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
AZ
NC
SC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.9M · 46 repeat orgs$588k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +77% since the first grant, against +66% for those funded once.

46 repeat relationships: 27 still active in FY2024, 19 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

46
22

Total granted

$8.9M
$433k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+77%
+66%

Still filing today

33%
18%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $155k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionEducationYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesHealthCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NN
    NORTHWEST NAZARENE UNIVERSITY INC
    3× · 2017–2023 · $500k · revenue +32%
  • PI
    PRISON IMPACT MINISTRIES
    8× · 2017–2024 · $400k · revenue +14% · 49% of their budget
  • LM
    LAUNCH MINISTRIES INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $380k · revenue +85%

Funded once

  • BI
    Because International Corp
    one grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue -16%
  • TA
    THE AMBROSE SCHOOL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $35k · revenue +66%
  • SM
    SEARCH MINISTRIES INC
    one grant, 2020 · $30k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Impact Ministries in
Religion
2
Explore God Network
—
3
North America Bible Institute

North America Bible Institute (NABI) is an evangelical graduate school, made up of students who are diverse in both ethnicity and ministry aims -- but united in great love for Jesus and his gospel. As a graduate school, NABI offers them…

Education
4
Discover Your Mission Inc

Supporing missionaries worldwide

Religion
5
Youth With a Mission Boise Cascade Inc

To work towards the great commission both locally and globally by partnering with the church to mobilize, equip, send and care for short-term teams and long-term workers who will take the gospel to the unreached.

Religion
6
More International Ministries

To spread the gospel of jesus christ through crusades

Religion
7
Leadership Resources International

International missions: this organization is an international mission agency focusing on leadership development through teaching of the scriptures

Religion
8
Propagate Media Incorporaton

This media outreach tool affords preachers and teachers of the Word in Christs Kingdom the global projection of media gospel. Our vision of Propagate Media Incorporation is to lift Jesus Christ higher for the world to see! But I, when I am…

Religion
9
Vision International Missions

To propagate the gospel of jesus christ; to examine candidates and appoint missionaries. to endorse missionary programs according to standards set forth in the new testament, to establish churches, church schools & mission societies in…

Religion
10
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
11
Awakening Ministries International

Proclaim the gospel worldwide, prepare followers of jesus christ, and propel those into their god given destiny.

Religion
12
Grateful Shepherd Ministries

Training pastors and leaders in christian faith

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Launch Ministries Inc; the most unlike its peers is Luis Palau Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 76 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/22
Grantees still filing
20/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BOISE RESCUE MISSION: $855,000 · OtherBOISE RESCUE MISSIONMISSION AVIATION FELLOWSHIP: $525,000 · OtherMISSION AVIATION FELLOWSHIPBAREFOOT MEDIA MINISTRY: $430,000 · OtherBAREFOOT MEDIA MINISTRYFELLOWSHP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $377,000 · OtherFELLOWSHP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETESIndividual grant recipient: $363,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBIBLE WAY INC: $320,000 · OtherBIBLE WAY INCLOVE INC: $295,000 · OtherHERITAGE BIBLE CHURCH: $293,900 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $215,000 · OtherJOSHUA INSTITUTE: $210,000 · Other+45 more: $1,940,571 · Other+45 morePHOENIX GOSPEL MISSION: $325,000 · ReligionPHOENIX GOSP…YOU GOTTA ASK INC: $208,000 · ReligionYOU GOTTA AS…BIBLICAL STUDIES CENTER INC THE BIBLICAL STUDIES CENTER: $200,000 · ReligionBIBLICAL STU…Master Minded Ministries Inc: $145,000 · ReligionMaster Minde…Luis Palau Association: $135,000 · ReligionLuis Palau A…INSPIRE IDAHO INC: $75,000 · ReligionINSPIRE IDAH…+2 more: $30,000 · ReligionNORTHWEST NAZARENE UNIVERSITY INC: $500,000 · EducationNORTHWEST N…The Moody Bible Institute of Chicago: $368,597 · EducationThe Moody B…NATIONAL CHRISTIAN COLLEGE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION: $75,000 · EducationNATIONAL CH…THE AMBROSE SCHOOL INC: $35,000 · Education+2 more: $15,000 · EducationLAUNCH MINISTRIES INC: $380,000 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG LIFE: $300,000 · Youth DevelopmentYOUTH WITH A MISSION OF COLO: $500,750 · HealthPRISON IMPACT MINISTRIES: $400,000 · Crime & LegalINTERNATIONAL MISSIONARY NETWORK: $153,000 · Human ServicesBecause International Corp: $50,000 · Human ServicesExpansion International Inc: $175,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$5,824,471Religion$1,118,000Education$993,597Youth Development$680,000Health$500,750Crime & Legal$400,000Human Services$203,000Arts & Culture$175,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYOUTH WITH A MISSION OF COLO: $500,750 over 8y, 8.6% of budgetNORTHWEST NAZARENE UNIVERSITY INC: $500,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetPRISON IMPACT MINISTRIES: $400,000 over 8y, 49% of budgetLAUNCH MINISTRIES INC: $380,000 over 8y, 18% of budgetThe Moody Bible Institute of Chicago: $368,597 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetPHOENIX GOSPEL MISSION: $325,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $300,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetYOU GOTTA ASK INC: $208,000 over 5y, 26% of budgetBIBLICAL STUDIES CENTER INC THE BIBLICAL STUDIES CENTER: $200,000 over 8y, 16% of budgetExpansion International Inc: $175,000 over 8y, 4.6% of budgetINTERNATIONAL MISSIONARY NETWORK: $153,000 over 5y, 27% of budgetMaster Minded Ministries Inc: $145,000 over 5y, 20% of budgetLuis Palau Association: $135,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetINSPIRE IDAHO INC: $75,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetNATIONAL CHRISTIAN COLLEGE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION: $75,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetBecause International Corp: $50,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetChild Evangelism Fellowship of Idaho: $45,000 over 2y, 9.9% of budgetTHE AMBROSE SCHOOL INC: $35,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCARING HEARTS AND HANDS OF HOPE INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetGLOBAL SERVICE NETWORK INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YOUTH WITH A MISSION OF COLO ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST NAZARENE UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds PRISON IMPACT MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds LAUNCH MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds The Moody Bible Institute of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds PHOENIX GOSPEL MISSION ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds YOU GOTTA ASK INC ↗
  • Who funds BIBLICAL STUDIES CENTER INC THE BIBLICAL STUDIES CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Expansion International Inc ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL MISSIONARY NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds Master Minded Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds Luis Palau Association ↗
  • Who funds INSPIRE IDAHO INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL CHRISTIAN COLLEGE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Because International Corp ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

John & Orah Brandt FoundationID26.4× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: John & Orah Brandt Foundation · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · The US Charitable Gift Trust · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Harold E & Phyllis S Thomas Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Harold E & Phyllis S Thomas Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Harold E & Phyllis S Thomas Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Harold E & Phyllis S Thomas Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 76 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Harold E & Phyllis S Thomas’ filings →

    More from the funding graph