Skip to content

Idaho · Nonprofit

INTERNATIONAL MISSIONARY NETWORK

INTERNATIONAL MISSIONARY NETWORK (Idaho) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $515,731 to it, the largest being JOHN & ORAH BRANDT FOUNDATION ($340,000). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$560k
Funders on record
4
Grants received
$516k
Net assets
$461k
4/4 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 55%
01What it does

What International Missionary Network does

Mission

International MIssionary Network offers education via three schools for children in India pastoral training for pastors in India and Africa and around the world and mentoring and martial arts for at-risk youth in Nampa Idaho.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. MK Hope Academy in Marou Village Manipur India provided education for children between the ages of 3-13. This school provides education for 5 different villages as it is the only school in that region of Manipur India.

    $43,740 spentof which $43,740 as grants$475 earned by the program
    29% of program spending
  2. Empty Hand Warrior Mentor Program. Through this program local youth in Nampa Idaho are able to learn martial arts and also be connected to a mentor. In 2025 75 youth participated in this program.

    $62,826 spentof which $62,826 as grants$17,896 earned by the program
    42% of program spending
  3. Chi Ching Academy in Sinakeithei Village Manipur India provides education for school driven from ages 3-15. This school has 250 students and 17 teachers. Some students are unable to pay and so they are offered scholarships for schooling and boarding. Chi Ching Academy staff also serve as administrators for two other schools IMN supports in Manipur.

    $20,940 spentof which $20,470 as grants$5,229 earned by the program
    14% of program spending
  4. Delhi Pastor Ministry. Provided support to pastors who teach in slums and also helped provide for selfsustaining businesses.

    $15,740 spentof which $15,740 as grants$6,532 earned by the program
    11% of program spending
  5. Kenya Africa Pastoral Support. Provide funds to build chicken coop and purchase chickens for selfsustaining project. Also provided funds to help build a church building.

    $658 spentof which $658 as grants$658 earned by the program
    0% of program spending
  6. Nagaland Seminary. Assist in building rooms for pastoral training center for 12 pastors. And provided selfsustaining income to senior citizens in remote village

    $5,600 spentof which $5,600 as grants$500 earned by the program
    4% of program spending

The 6 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $149,504.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2019, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2019, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20192019 Revenue 100 ($157k) Expenses 100 ($135k) Net assets 100 ($33k)2020 Revenue 129 ($203k) Expenses 66 ($90k) Net assets 442 ($147k)2021 Revenue 104 ($163k) Expenses 82 ($111k) Net assets 599 ($199k)2022 Revenue 127 ($200k) Expenses 147 ($198k) Net assets 604 ($200k)2023 Revenue 99 ($155k) Expenses 129 ($174k) Net assets 546 ($181k)2024 Revenue 111 ($174k) Expenses 152 ($204k) Net assets 456 ($151k)2025 Revenue 356 ($560k) Expenses 187 ($252k) Net assets 1390 ($461k)
2019202020212022202320242025
Revenue (356)Expenses (187)Net assets (1390)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2024 to 2025, from $151k to $461k (+205%).

$33k
$147k
$199k
$200k
$181k
$151k
$461k
2019202020212022202320242025
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

100% of INTERNATIONAL MISSIONARY NETWORK’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (91% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 23,870 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 7 reported years ran a deficit.

$22k
’19
$114k
’20
$52k
’21
$2k
’22
−$19k
’23
−$30k
’24
$308k
’25
22
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Board chair

Cindy Andeson

Chair

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

202020222025
Listed817
Joined···
No longer listed···
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2018 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 3 funders, grant income rose $10k → $85k.

2 of 4 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 4% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of INTERNATIONAL MISSIONARY NETWORK’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

INTERNATIONAL MISSIONARY NETWORK leans on a few funders — its largest provides 66% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

66%
largest funder
100%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2018 100% · 2019 41% · 2020 67% · 2021 53% · 2022 51% · 2023 88% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of INTERNATIONAL MISSIONARY NETWORK's grant income comes from Idaho funders.

ID

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Idaho out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $23k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

INTERNATIONAL MISSIONARY NETWORK runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 13,062 human services nonprofits its size.

Operating margin55% · top quartile
Months of reserve21.6mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)24% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 13,062 human services nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Organizations like INTERNATIONAL MISSIONARY NETWORK

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Idaho

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

59% of spending goes to programs.

Program 59%Management 38%Fundraising 2%

Governance

7
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

19%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

ID

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for INTERNATIONAL MISSIONARY NETWORK: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds INTERNATIONAL MISSIONARY NETWORK?
INTERNATIONAL MISSIONARY NETWORK (Idaho) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $515,731 to it, the largest being JOHN & ORAH BRANDT FOUNDATION ($340,000). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does INTERNATIONAL MISSIONARY NETWORK have?
IRS filings report 4 organizations giving $515,731 in grants to INTERNATIONAL MISSIONARY NETWORK, 4 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of INTERNATIONAL MISSIONARY NETWORK?
JOHN & ORAH BRANDT FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $340,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like INTERNATIONAL MISSIONARY NETWORK find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Idaho. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds International Missionary Network →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2019–2025), and the filings of 4 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing