Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Iq Credit Union

To provide a full complement of quality financial services in a convenient, efficient, friendly, secure and profitable manner which meets the need of the membership.

$304k
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$72k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Recreation & Sports$270kEducation$80kCommunity Improvement$79kArts & Culture$72kMembership Benefit$55kHuman Services$48kHealth$38kPublic Benefit$35kOther$0
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 17 grants below total $239,081 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $304,081 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $65,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $59k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $109k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $72k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.0B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KGW$71,678
DBA FOUNDATION FOR VANCOUVER PUBLIC SCHOOLS$21,800
NW ASSOCIATION FOR BLIND ATHLETES$20,000
CHILDRENS MIRACLE NETWORK HOSPITALS$15,000
MOUNT ST HELENS INSTITUTE$12,000
WHY RACING EVENTS INC$10,000
CLARK COUNTY LATINO YOUTH LEADERSHIP$10,000
COLUMBIA PLAY PROJECT$10,000
LIGHTHOUSE FINANCIAL FOUNDATION$10,000
GOWEST FOUNDATION$9,850
BUILDING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION$9,250
PARKS FOUNDATION OF CLARK COUNTY$8,500
DIY BAR LLC$7,590
NORTH CLACKAMAS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$6,500
RIDGEFIELD RAPTORS$6,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $27k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%GOWEST FOUNDATION: $10k → 9%LIGHTHOUSE FINANCIAL FOUNDATION: $10k → 9%AMERICAN RED CROSS - SW WA CHAPTER: $8k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 10% of Iq Credit Union’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 75% of the giving stays in WA; read by stated purpose it is 69% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Iq Credit Unionlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$565k · 13 repeat orgs$220k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +82% since the first grant, against +44% for the ones you funded once.

13 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
10

Total granted

$565k
$119k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+82%
+44%

Still filing today

38%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEnvironmentEducationYouth DevelopmentPublic BenefitPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VS
    VANCOUVER SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDATION
    3× · 2017–2024 · $70k · revenue +259%
  • TP
    THE PARKS AND RECREATION FOUNDATION OF VANCOUVER AND CLARK COUNTY
    7× · 2018–2024 · $54k · revenue +82%
  • CM
    CHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK
    2× · 2023–2024 · $30k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • OREGON FOOD BANKgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue +70%
  • DC
    DOERNBECHER CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $20k · revenue -40%
  • WR
    WHY RACING EVENTS INC
    one grant, 2018 · $18k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Oregon Center for Public Policy

The oregon center for public policy's mission is to achieve economic justice for all oregonians through research, analysis, and advocacy. ocpp works to change policies that foster economic security and stability for all oregonians. we do…

Employment
2
Our Oregon

Promote economic and social fairness by working in coalition open a broad range of issues and activities in the public arena

Human Services
3
Greater Spokane Valley Chamber of Commerce

Committed to fostering relationships between members and the community. to serve the interest of members by acting as a catalyst for a vibrant sustainable economy.

4
Clackamas River Basin Council Inc

The council is organized to foster partnerships for clean water, healthy streams, and abundant fisheries in the Clackamas Watershed

Environment
5
The Community Foundation of South Puget Sound

To grow a lasting culture of generosity and well-being in the South Puget Sound through connection, leadership, and investment.

Philanthropy
6
Eugene Area Chamber of Commerce

The mission of the eugene area chamber of commerce is to promote a healthy local economy by influencing business success, public policy, and community development.

7
Community Foundation of Snohomish County

The Community Foundation of Snohomish County (the Foundation) is a nonprofit, tax-exempt organization incorporated under the laws of the State of Washington. The Foundation serves as a community foundation, supporting a broad spectrum of…

Philanthropy
8
Community Lendingworks

To develop economically vibrant, inclusive communities by providing accessible loans that help community members, small businesses, and affordable housing developers reach their goals regardless of income level, racial identity or location.

Community Improvement
9
Portland Business Alliance

To ensure economic prosperity in the portland region by providing strong leadership, partnership, and programs that encourage business growth and vitality.

Community Improvement
10
Lane County Community Foundation

The mission of Lane County Community Foundation (the Foundation) is to improve the quality of life in Lane County, Kansas and communities within Lane County, and to ensure that the communities in and around Lane County will forever remain…

Philanthropy
11
Pacific Northwest Economic Region Foundation

To increase the economic well-being and quality of life for all citizens of the region; to coordinate provincial, territorial, and state policies throughout the region; to identify and promote "models of success and to serve as a conduit…

12
Coeur Dalene Chamber of Commerce

To promote, support and advocate for the chamber's members, strengthen the economic climate of the coeur d'alene area, and further the free enterprise system.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation for Sw Washington and the most unlike its peers is Community Military Appreciation Committee - Cmac. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/22
Grantees still filing
10/22
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

KGW — $114,558 · OtherKGWWHY RACING EVENTS INC — $91,000 · OtherWHY RACING EVENTS INCGREATER VANCOUVER CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $63,678 · OtherGREATER VANCOUVER CHAMBER OF COMMERCECHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK HOSPITALS — $51,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK HOSPITALSCHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK — $30,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORKNORTHWEST CREDIT UNION ASSOCIATION — $20,580 · OtherOREGON FOOD BANK — $20,000 · OtherDOERNBECHER CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $19,676 · Other+11 more — $129,565 · Other+11 moreVANCOUVER SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDATION — $69,800 · EducationVANCOUVER SC…COLUMBIA PLAY PROJECT — $10,000 · EducationCOLUMBIA PLA…OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $7,500 · EducationOREGON HEALT…THE PARKS AND RECREATION FOUNDATION OF VANCOUVER AND CLARK COUNTY — $54,450 · EnvironmentTHE PARKS A…Oregon Parks Forever — $15,000 · EnvironmentOregon Park…MOUNT ST HELENS INSTITUTE — $12,000 · EnvironmentMOUNT ST HE…NORTHWEST ASSOCIATION FOR BLIND ATHLETES — $20,000 · Human ServicesLIGHTHOUSE FINANCIAL FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Human ServicesGOWEST FOUNDATION — $9,850 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $7,500 · Human ServicesCLARK COUNTY LATINO YOUTH CONFERENCE — $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentELEVATE OREGON — $5,200 · Youth DevelopmentCommunity Foundation for SW Washington — $7,500 · PhilanthropyCHARITABLE PARTNERSHIP FUND — $6,500 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY MILITARY APPRECIATION COMMITTEE - CMAC — $6,500 · Public Benefit
Other$540,057Education$87,300Environment$81,450Human Services$47,350Youth Development$15,200Philanthropy$14,000Public Benefit$6,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetVANCOUVER SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDATION — $69,800 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetGREATER VANCOUVER CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $63,678 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetTHE PARKS AND RECREATION FOUNDATION OF VANCOUVER AND CLARK COUNTY — $54,450 over 7y, 8.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK — $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWEST ASSOCIATION FOR BLIND ATHLETES — $20,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetOREGON FOOD BANK — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDOERNBECHER CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $19,676 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGOWEST CREDIT UNION ASSOCIATION — $15,225 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOregon Parks Forever — $15,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetMOUNT ST HELENS INSTITUTE — $12,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCLARK COUNTY LATINO YOUTH CONFERENCE — $10,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetLIGHTHOUSE FINANCIAL FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCOLUMBIA PLAY PROJECT — $10,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetGOWEST FOUNDATION — $9,850 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBuilding Industry Association of Clark County — $9,250 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Foundation for SW Washington — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH CLACKAMAS CO CHAMBER OF COMM — $6,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCHARITABLE PARTNERSHIP FUND — $6,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY MILITARY APPRECIATION COMMITTEE - CMAC — $6,500 over 1y, 9.1% of budgetELEVATE OREGON — $5,200 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Onpoint Community Credit UnionOR21.8× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Onpoint Community Credit Union · The Oregon Community Foundation · Columbia Community Credit Union · Advantis Credit Union · Hapo Community Credit Union · The Firstenburg Foundation · United Way of the Columbia-Willamette · Umpqua Bank Charitable Foundation · Meyer Memorial Trust · Hillman Family Foundations · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · M J Murdock Charitable Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Iq Credit Union funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 21%
  • Elevate Oregon28% of income from government
  • Oregon Food Bank21% of income from government
  • Oregon Health & Science University Foundation1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph