Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Hamp Family Fund

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$240k
Granted FY2024still arriving
27
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$28k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$607kEnvironment$201kFood & Nutrition$200kEducation$178kRecreation & Sports$99kYouth Development$89kHousing & Shelter$88kArts & Culture$70kOther$0
02FY2024 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k17 grants · $63k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $178k
$5,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$6.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DETROIT RIVERFRONT CONSERVANCY$27,500
GRAND TRAVERSE REGIONAL LAND CONSERVANCY$25,000
FAIR FOOD NETWORK$25,000
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN$21,000
CHADTOUGH FOUNDATION$20,000
DETROIT PISTONS FOUNDATION$15,000
HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM$12,000
THE HENRY FORD$12,000
AUTISM ALLIANCE OF MICHIGAN$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
COLORADO COLLEGE$9,000
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN OFFICE DEVELOPMENT$8,500
COLLEGE OF CREATIVE STUDIES$5,000
BUTLER FUND$5,000
GROUNDWORK CENTER FOR RESILENT COMMUNITIES$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $337k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%STREET SOCCER USA: $1k → 20%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 14%LIGHTUP: $5k → 11%LIGHTUP: $5k → 11%LIGHTUP: $3k → 11%OZONE HOUSE: $15k → 14%LIGHTUP: $1k → 11%ORCHARDS CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $3k → 8%THE FLATWATER FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%FLATWATER FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%LIGHTUP: $10k → 8%FLATWATER FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%LIGHTUP: $10k → 8%FLATWATER FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%LIGHTUP: $6k → 8%LIGHTUP: $5k → 8%OZONE HOUSE: $4k → 14%THE EMPOWERMENT PLAN: $20k → 21%THE EMPOWERMENT PLAN: $15k → 21%THE EMPOWERMENT PLAN: $15k → 21%FLATWATER FOUNDATION: $2k → 10%FLATWATER FOUNDATION: $2k → 10%CHADTOUGH FOUNDATION: $30k → 14%CHADTOUGH FOUNDATION: $25k → 14%FLATWATER FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%CHADTOUGH FOUNDATION: $20k → 14%CHADTOUGH FOUNDATION: $20k → 14%FLATWATER FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%CHADTOUGH FOUNDATION: $15k → 14%CHADTOUGH FOUNDATION: $15k → 14%CHADTOUGH FOUNDATION: $15k → 14%THE CHADTOUGH FOUNDATION: $12k → 14%THE CHADTOUGH FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%CHADTOUGH FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%THE CHADTOUGH FOUNDATION: $6k → 14%THE CHADTOUGH FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%BASE BLUE INC: $5k → 21%BASE BLUE INC: $4k → 21%THE EMPOWERMENT PLAN: $5k → 21%OZONE HOUSE: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
WA
IL
MI
NY
MA
IN
PA
CT
RI
CO
DC
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 5% of Hamp Family Fund’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 83% of the giving stays in MI; read by stated purpose it is 79% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Hamp Family Fundlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.5M · 39 repeat orgs$169k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.

39 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2024, 19 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

39
26

Total granted

$1.5M
$147k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+15%

Still filing today

64%
77%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureEducationFood & NutritionEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CD
    CHADTOUGH DEFEAT DIPG FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $183k · revenue +220%
  • FF
    FAIR FOOD NETWORK INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $142k · revenue +60%
  • UO
    University of Michigan
    8× · 2017–2024 · $113k · revenue +202%

Funded once

  • GT
    GRAND TRAVERSE REGIONAL LAND CONS
    one grant, 2021 · $15k
  • HW
    HURON WATERLOO PATHWAYS INITIATIVE
    one grant, 2022 · $15k
  • SPECIAL OLYMPICS MICHIGAN INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue +71%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Business Leaders for Michigan

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

2
Business Leaders for Michigan Foundation

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

Community Improvement
3
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

4
DePauw University

Depauw university develops leaders the world needs through an uncommon commitment to the liberal arts. depauw's diverse and inclusive learning and living experience, distinctive in its rigorous intellectual engagement and its global and…

Education
5
Michigan Science Center

The mission of the michigan science center is to inspire curious minds of all ages to discover, explore and appreciate science, technology, engineering and math in a creative, dynamic learning environment.

Education
6
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
7
The Northern Michigan University Foundation

The nmu foundation will establish and foster relationships to generate resources that benefit the strategic goals of northern michigan university.

Education
8
The Center for Michigan

For all state residents, diverse civic stakeholders and philanthropy, the center for michigan (the center) and its nonprofit newsrooms - bridge michigan and bridgedetroit - make michigan better through high-quality, nonpartisan journalism…

Public Benefit
9
Michigan Biotechnology Institute

Bridging the gap between early-stage innovation and commercial application. partnering to de-risk, develop and scale-up discoveries into commercially-viable technology packages.

Education
10
Michigan Pharmacists Association

To encourage and support its members as professionals responsible for the delivery of patient-focused care.

11
Detroit Food Policy Council

The organization was founded by a group of concerned citizens, working in cooperation with the detroit city council, to shape food policy and to work for a more localized, more just, and environmentally friendly food system. the…

Food & Nutrition
12
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan and the most unlike its peers is The Stone Trust Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity Development Organ…Labor Union OrganizationsK-12 Schools and Early Chil…Family Philanthropic Founda…Animal Shelter and RescueArts Education and Cultural…Professional Membership Org…Faith-Based Community Servi…Senior Housing and Youth Su…Hospital Health Systems
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%0%<5yr13%13%5–10yr20%21%10–20yr15%15%20–35yr14%28%35–55yr18%23%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%0%<5yr13%4%5–10yr20%38%10–20yr15%12%20–35yr14%25%35–55yr18%20%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/56
the rest of the field
12%
6,511/53,800

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

50 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 50 of the 73 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
49/50
Grantees still filing
35/50
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

University of Michigan — $113,000 · OtherUniversity of MichiganDETROIT LIONS FOUNDATION — $60,000 · OtherDETROIT LIONS FOUNDATIONTHE HENRY FORD — $41,000 · OtherTHE HENRY FORDMIKE UTLEY FOUNDATION — $35,000 · OtherMIKE UTLEY FOUNDATIONFOOD GATHERERS — $31,000 · OtherGROUNDWORK CENTER FOR RESILIENT COMMUNITIES INC — $26,500 · OtherDETROIT PISTONS FOUNDATION — $25,000 · OtherLS CLASSIC FOUNDATION — $40,000 · OtherLS CLASSIC FOUNDATIONTHE PURPLE ROSE THEATRE COMPANY — $30,000 · Other+32 more — $239,000 · Other+32 moreCHADTOUGH DEFEAT DIPG FOUNDATION — $183,000 · Human ServicesCHADTOUGH DEFEAT DIPG …THE EMPOWERMENT PLAN — $55,000 · Human ServicesTHE EMPOWERMENT PLANLIGHTUP — $45,000 · Human ServicesLIGHTUPOZONE HOUSE INC — $21,500 · Human ServicesOZONE HOUSE INC+5 more — $32,500 · Human Services+5 moreHENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM — $102,500 · HealthHENRY FORD H…AUTISM ALLIANCE OF MICHIGAN — $57,000 · HealthAUTISM ALLIA…ALS THERAPY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · HealthALS THERAPY …+4 more — $17,000 · Health+4 moreFAIR FOOD NETWORK INC — $142,000 · Food & NutritionFAIR FOOD N…GLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN — $15,000 · Food & NutritionGLEANERS CO…FORGOTTEN HARVEST INC — $11,000 · Food & NutritionFORGOTTEN H…+1 more — $1,000 · Food & NutritionGREENHILLS SCHOOL — $64,500 · EducationGREENHILLS…THE COLORADO COLLEGE — $57,000 · EducationTHE COLORA…AFTER SCHOOL MATTERS INC — $25,000 · EducationAFTER SCHO…Butler University — $7,000 · Education+1 more — $1,000 · EducationGRAND TRAVERSE REGIONAL LAND CONSERVANCY — $95,000 · EnvironmentHURON WATERLOO PATHWAYS INITIATIVE — $10,000 · EnvironmentMICHIGAN ENVIROMENTAL COUNCIL — $5,000 · Environment+1 more — $2,000 · EnvironmentDETROIT RIVERFRONT CONSERVANCY INC — $57,500 · Recreation & SportsSPECIAL OLYMPICS MICHIGAN INC — $15,000 · Recreation & SportsRACQUET UP DETROIT — $11,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$640,500Human Services$337,000Health$186,500Food & Nutrition$169,000Education$154,500Environment$112,000Recreation & Sports$83,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCHADTOUGH DEFEAT DIPG FOUNDATION — $183,000 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetFAIR FOOD NETWORK INC — $142,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetUniversity of Michigan — $113,000 over 8y, 7.2% of budgetHENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM — $102,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGRAND TRAVERSE REGIONAL LAND CONSERVANCY — $95,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetGREENHILLS SCHOOL — $64,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetDETROIT RIVERFRONT CONSERVANCY INC — $57,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE COLORADO COLLEGE — $57,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAUTISM ALLIANCE OF MICHIGAN — $57,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetTHE EMPOWERMENT PLAN — $55,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetLIGHTUP — $45,000 over 4y, 38% of budgetLS CLASSIC FOUNDATION — $40,000 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetFOOD GATHERERS — $31,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PURPLE ROSE THEATRE COMPANY — $30,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetGROUNDWORK CENTER FOR RESILIENT COMMUNITIES INC — $26,500 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetDETROIT PISTONS FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetAFTER SCHOOL MATTERS INC — $25,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetOZONE HOUSE INC — $21,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetGLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS MICHIGAN INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE STONE TRUST CORPORATION — $11,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetRACQUET UP DETROIT — $11,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetFORGOTTEN HARVEST INC — $11,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FLATWATER FOUNDATON — $10,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetHURON WATERLOO PATHWAYS INITIATIVE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetALS THERAPY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBASBLUE INC — $9,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY — $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetButler University — $7,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN — $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEDIATRIC FOUDNATION OF MICHIG INC — $5,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetMICHIGAN THEATER FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMICHIGAN ENVIROMENTAL COUNCIL — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDON'T FORGET ME — $5,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetGARRETT'S SPACE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetORCHARDS CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE GARDEN THEATER — $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMICHIGAN LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLegal Council for Health Justice — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTREET SOCCER USA INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANN ARBOR HANDS-ON MUSEUM — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLEGE FOR CREATIVE STUDIES — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ELIZABETH LANE OLIVER CENTER FOR THE ARTS — $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAnn Arbor Art Association — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTOP BOX FOODS — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHADTOUGH DEFEAT DIPG FOUNDATION
  • Who funds FAIR FOOD NETWORK INC
  • Who funds University of Michigan
  • Who funds HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM
  • Who funds GRAND TRAVERSE REGIONAL LAND CONSERVANCY
  • Who funds GREENHILLS SCHOOL
  • Who funds DETROIT RIVERFRONT CONSERVANCY INC
  • Who funds THE COLORADO COLLEGE
  • Who funds AUTISM ALLIANCE OF MICHIGAN
  • Who funds THE EMPOWERMENT PLAN
  • Who funds LIGHTUP
  • Who funds LS CLASSIC FOUNDATION
  • Who funds FOOD GATHERERS
  • Who funds THE PURPLE ROSE THEATRE COMPANY
  • Who funds GROUNDWORK CENTER FOR RESILIENT COMMUNITIES INC
  • Who funds DETROIT PISTONS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds AFTER SCHOOL MATTERS INC
  • Who funds OZONE HOUSE INC
  • Who funds GLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS MICHIGAN INC
  • Who funds THE STONE TRUST CORPORATION
  • Who funds RACQUET UP DETROIT
  • Who funds FORGOTTEN HARVEST INC
  • Who funds THE FLATWATER FOUNDATON
  • Who funds HURON WATERLOO PATHWAYS INITIATIVE
  • Who funds ALS THERAPY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
  • Who funds BASBLUE INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ann Arbor Area Community FoundationMI29.9× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ann Arbor Area Community Foundation · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Dte Energy Foundation · Ford Philanthropy · The Martin Family Foundation · WK Kellogg Foundation · Harry a and Margaret D Towsley Foundation · The Ralph C Wilson Jr Foundation · The Kresge Foundation · United Way of Washtenaw County · Michigan Health Endowment Fund · Charles Stewart Mott Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Hamp Family Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 8%
  • Als Therapy Development Foundation Inc8% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
22report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Hamp Family Fund?

Find your warmest path to Hamp Family Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 73 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph