How much does Hamp Family Fund give?

Hamp Family Fund reported 27 grants totaling $240,000 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 23 and 32 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.

What does Hamp Family Fund fund?

By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Health (36%), Environment (12%), Food & Nutrition (12%).

Who are Hamp Family Fund's largest grantees?

By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: Chadtough Defeat Dipg Foundation ($183k), Fair Food Network Inc ($142k), University of Michigan ($113k).

Does Hamp Family Fund fund new organizations?

In FY2023, 24% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.

Does Hamp Family Fund accept unsolicited applications?

Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.

Which funders back the same organizations as Hamp Family Fund?

Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Ann Arbor Area Community Foundation, Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan, DTE Energy Foundation.

Where is Hamp Family Fund based?

Hamp Family Fund is based in MI.

Hamp Family Fund

Hamp Family Fund at a glance

· Private foundation

Hamp Family Fund

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$240k

Granted FY2024still arriving

Grants FY2024still arriving

States reached

$28k

Largest

01What it funds

0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$607kEnvironment$201kFood & Nutrition$200kEducation$178kRecreation & Sports$99kYouth Development$89kHousing & Shelter$88kArts & Culture$70kOther$0

02FY2024 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k17 grants · $63k
$10k–50k10 grants · $178k

$5,000

Median grant

States reached

$6.2M

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
DETROIT RIVERFRONT CONSERVANCY	$27,500
FAIR FOOD NETWORK	$25,000
GRAND TRAVERSE REGIONAL LAND CONSERVANCY	$25,000
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN	$21,000
CHADTOUGH FOUNDATION	$20,000
DETROIT PISTONS FOUNDATION	$15,000
THE HENRY FORD	$12,000
HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM	$12,000
Individual grant recipient	$10,000
AUTISM ALLIANCE OF MICHIGAN	$10,000
COLORADO COLLEGE	$9,000
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN OFFICE DEVELOPMENT	$8,500
LONE STAR PARALYSIS FOUNDATION	$5,000
BUTLER FUND	$5,000
GROUNDWORK CENTER FOR RESILENT COMMUNITIES	$5,000

02The need

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $337k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

How this is measured

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

How this is measured

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 5% of Hamp Family Fund’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 83% of the giving stays in MI; by stated purpose, 79%.

Hamp Family Fundlessmore of its giving

Placed by recipient address

How this is measured

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Its grantees

repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.

$1.5M · 39 repeat orgs$169k to everyone else

39 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2024, 19 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$1.5M

$147k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%

+43%

Still filing today

64%

77%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureEducationFood & NutritionEnvironmentOther

How this is measured

First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

CD
CHADTOUGH DEFEAT DIPG FOUNDATION
8× · 2017–2024 · $183k · revenue +220%
FF
FAIR FOOD NETWORK INC
8× · 2017–2024 · $142k · revenue +60%
UO
University of Michigan
8× · 2017–2024 · $113k · revenue +202%

Funded once

GT
GRAND TRAVERSE REGIONAL LAND CONS
one grant, 2021 · $15k
SPECIAL OLYMPICS MICHIGAN INCgraduated
one grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue +71%
HW
HURON WATERLOO PATHWAYS INITIATIVE
one grant, 2022 · $15k

How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Business Leaders for Michigan

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

—

Business Leaders for Michigan Foundation

Community Improvement

Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—

DePauw University

Depauw university develops leaders the world needs through an uncommon commitment to the liberal arts. depauw's diverse and inclusive learning and living experience, distinctive in its rigorous intellectual engagement and its global and…

Education

Michigan Science Center

The mission of the michigan science center is to inspire curious minds of all ages to discover, explore and appreciate science, technology, engineering and math in a creative, dynamic learning environment.

Education

Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement

The Northern Michigan University Foundation

The nmu foundation will establish and foster relationships to generate resources that benefit the strategic goals of northern michigan university.

Education

The Center for Michigan

For all state residents, diverse civic stakeholders and philanthropy, the center for michigan (the center) and its nonprofit newsrooms - bridge michigan and bridgedetroit - make michigan better through high-quality, nonpartisan journalism…

Public Benefit

Michigan Biotechnology Institute

Bridging the gap between early-stage innovation and commercial application. partnering to de-risk, develop and scale-up discoveries into commercially-viable technology packages.

Education

Michigan Pharmacists Association

To encourage and support its members as professionals responsible for the delivery of patient-focused care.

—

Detroit Food Policy Council

The organization was founded by a group of concerned citizens, working in cooperation with the detroit city council, to shape food policy and to work for a more localized, more just, and environmentally friendly food system. the…

Food & Nutrition

Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education

How this is measured

The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan; the most unlike its peers is The Stone Trust Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

50 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 50 of the 73 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

49/50

Grantees still filing

36/50

Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Other$640,500Human Services$337,000Health$186,500Food & Nutrition$169,000Education$154,500Environment$112,000Recreation & Sports$83,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ann Arbor Area Community FoundationMI29.9× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ann Arbor Area Community Foundation · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · DTE Energy Foundation · Ford Philanthropy · The Martin Family Foundation · WK Kellogg Foundation · Harry a and Margaret D Towsley Foundation · The Ralph C Wilson Jr Foundation · The Kresge Foundation · United Way of Washtenaw County · Michigan Health Endowment Fund · Charles Stewart Mott Foundation

How this is measured

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hamp Family Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hamp Family Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

1get no government money at all

22report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–25

How this is measured

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Hamp Family Fund?

Find your warmest path to Hamp Family Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

Play a game based on Hamp Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The endowment market

who holds foundation money, and what just moved

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home