Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Hale Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$630k
Granted FY2025still arriving
52
Grants FY2025still arriving
17
States reached
$195k
Largest
01What you fund
0183% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172025.

Education$1.9MPhilanthropy$200kEnvironment$97kHuman Services$91kArts & Culture$58kHealth$41kFood & Nutrition$17kScience & Tech$8kAnimals$5kOther$502k
02FY2025 · 52 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k42 grants · $49k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $100k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $481k
$1,000
Median grant
17
States reached
$9.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PURDUE RESEARCH FOUNDATION$195,000
SCHWAB CHARITABLE$176,000
NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY$60,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
OUTREACH COMMUNITY MINISTRIES$33,000
CHICAGO CLASSIC COMPUTING$20,000
NORTHWESTERN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION$15,000
DUPAGE COUNTY HISTORICAL MUSEUM FOU$12,000
GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY$10,000
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL EDUC$10,000
INTERNATIONAL MUSEUM OF SURGICAL SC$6,000
FRIENDS OF SOUTH GEORGIA ISLAND$5,000
SIMMARON RESEARCH$5,000
ALASKA WHALE FOUNDATION$5,000
MEET THE OCEAN$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $91k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 3% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE LIGHTHOUSE SHELTER: $1k → 13%OUTREACH COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $33k → 7%OUTREACH COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $20k → 7%OUTREACH COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $15k → 7%OUTREACH COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $10k → 7%OUTREACH COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $10k → 7%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $500 → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $500 → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $500 → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $500 → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $100 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
ID
IL
WI
NY
MA
OR
WY
IN
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
DE
KS
TN
DC
OK
LA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.7M · 58 repeat orgs$27k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +29% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.

58 repeat relationships — 49 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

58
22

Total granted

$2.7M
$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+10%

Still filing today

76%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentHealthArts & CultureEducationPhilanthropyFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NG
    NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY
    7× · 2019–2025 · $273k · revenue +100%
  • DU
    DEPAUL UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2019–2023 · $113k · revenue +17%
  • OC
    OUTREACH COMMUNITY MINISTRIES
    5× · 2021–2025 · $88k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • DA
    DAVID AND CLAUDIA JACKSON FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $6k · revenue +118%
  • BF
    Bluesphere Foundation Inc
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
2
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
3
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
4
Science Museum of Minnesota

The museum's mission statement is "turn on the science: inspire learning. inform policy. improve lives."

Arts & Culture
5
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
6
Earth & Space Research

Increase societal understanding of the earth system through scientific research and education.

Science & Tech
7
Lowell Observatory

The mission of lowell observatory is to pursue the study of astronomy, especially the study of our solar system and its evolution; to conduct pure research in astronomical phenomena; and to maintain quality public education and outreach…

Science & Tech
8
The Adler Planetarium

The adler planetarium ('adler') is a not-for-profit cultural institution whose mission is to connect people to the universe and each other under the sky we all share. it aspires to be the world's premier center for engaging in astronomy…

Arts & Culture
9
Denver Zoological Foundation

Inspiring communities to save wildlife for future generations.

Animals
10
Climate Institute

The climate institute is organized for the purpose of educating the general public and policy makers as to the gravity of potential climate change, exploring the policy implications of the latest scientific findings on climate modelling…

Environment
11
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
12
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Environmental Defense Fund Incorporated and the most unlike its peers is David and Claudia Jackson Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Food Banks and PantriesCommunity FoundationsHealth Access Advocacy and …School District FoundationsPregnancy Support ServicesAffordable Housing Construc…Environmental Conservation …Cancer Support ServicesCommunity College Foundatio…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 48 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%2%<5yr13%2%5–10yr18%7%10–20yr14%26%20–35yr13%23%35–55yr23%40%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%2%<5yr13%1%5–10yr18%1%10–20yr14%11%20–35yr13%7%35–55yr23%79%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 2% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%1/62
the rest of the field
10%
4,324/41,933

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

57 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 57 of the 84 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
56/57
Grantees still filing
42/57
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Purdue Research Foundation — $1,491,750 · EducationPurdue Research FoundationNATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY — $272,500 · EducationNATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETYDEPAUL UNIVERSITY — $113,000 · EducationDEPAUL UNIVERSITY+2 more — $13,300 · EducationIndividual grant recipient — $267,500 · OtherIndividual grant rec…NORTHWESTERN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION — $71,100 · OtherNORTHWESTERN MEMORIA…CHICAGO CLASSIC COMPUTING INC — $52,000 · OtherCHICAGO CLASSIC COMP…ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL EDUC — $40,000 · OtherILLINOIS ENVIRONMENT…+36 more — $100,900 · Other+36 moreDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $176,000 · PhilanthropyFRIENDS OF SOUTH GEORGIA ISLAND — $8,100 · Philanthropy+5 more — $15,500 · PhilanthropyAlaska Whale Foundation — $30,000 · EnvironmentLOOKOUT MOUNTAIN CONSERVANCY — $24,000 · EnvironmentRIVERKEEPER INC — $20,000 · EnvironmentTHE CONSERVATION FOUNDATION — $7,500 · EnvironmentOceanitesInc — $4,200 · EnvironmentYELLOWSTONE FOREVER — $4,200 · Environment+5 more — $6,950 · EnvironmentOUTREACH COMMUNITY MINISTRIES — $88,000 · Human Services+2 more — $3,100 · Human ServicesDUPAGE COUNTY HISTORICAL MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC — $28,000 · Arts & CultureSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION — $13,050 · Arts & CultureWINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC — $6,000 · Arts & CultureTHE NATIONAL WORLD WAR II MUSEUM INC — $4,500 · Arts & CultureFIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY — $2,750 · Arts & CultureKenneth C Griffin Museum of Science and Industry — $2,700 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $1,000 · Arts & CultureINTERNATIONAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS — $14,000 · HealthAngel Flight Central Inc — $6,000 · HealthRonald McDonald House Global — $5,400 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $4,400 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $3,300 · HealthGateway Foundation Inc — $3,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $2,050 · Health+4 more — $3,000 · Health
Education$1,890,550Other$531,500Philanthropy$199,600Environment$96,850Human Services$91,100Arts & Culture$58,000Health$41,150

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPurdue Research Foundation — $1,491,750 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY — $272,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $176,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDEPAUL UNIVERSITY — $113,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetOUTREACH COMMUNITY MINISTRIES — $88,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetAlaska Whale Foundation — $30,000 over 7y, 4.0% of budgetDUPAGE COUNTY HISTORICAL MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC — $28,000 over 7y, 11% of budgetLOOKOUT MOUNTAIN CONSERVANCY — $24,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetRIVERKEEPER INC — $20,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetINTERNATIONAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS — $14,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY — $14,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION — $13,050 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCANTIGNY FOUNDATION — $12,375 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TAU BETA PI ASSOCIATION INC — $9,100 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF SOUTH GEORGIA ISLAND — $8,100 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CONSERVATION FOUNDATION — $7,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMEET THE OCEAN — $7,000 over 5y, 5.9% of budgetAngel Flight Central Inc — $6,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetDAVID AND CLAUDIA JACKSON FOUNDATION — $6,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetWINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC — $6,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetRonald McDonald House Global — $5,400 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION — $4,600 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $4,550 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SUMMIT FOUNDATION — $4,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATIONAL WORLD WAR II MUSEUM INC — $4,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $4,400 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetOceanitesInc — $4,200 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetYELLOWSTONE FOREVER — $4,200 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSIGMA KAPPA FOUNDATION — $4,200 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $3,300 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGateway Foundation Inc — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $2,850 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY — $2,750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetKenneth C Griffin Museum of Science and Industry — $2,700 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MORTON ARBORETUM — $2,700 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMIKEROWEWORKS FOUNDATION — $2,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $2,100 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $2,050 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WILDERNESS SOCIETY — $1,700 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetYOSEMITE FOUNDATION — $1,600 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY — $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE US CHARITABLE GIFT TRUST — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMULTIPLE SCLEROSIS FOUNDATION INC — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Eisenhower Foundation — $1,400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LIGHTHOUSE SHELTER — $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC — $1,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMILTON TOWNSHIP FOOD PANTRY INC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Purdue Research Foundation
  • Who funds NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY
  • Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC
  • Who funds DEPAUL UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds OUTREACH COMMUNITY MINISTRIES
  • Who funds Alaska Whale Foundation
  • Who funds DUPAGE COUNTY HISTORICAL MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds LOOKOUT MOUNTAIN CONSERVANCY
  • Who funds RIVERKEEPER INC
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS
  • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY
  • Who funds SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION
  • Who funds CANTIGNY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE TAU BETA PI ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF SOUTH GEORGIA ISLAND
  • Who funds THE CONSERVATION FOUNDATION
  • Who funds MEET THE OCEAN
  • Who funds Angel Flight Central Inc
  • Who funds DAVID AND CLAUDIA JACKSON FOUNDATION
  • Who funds WINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC
  • Who funds Ronald McDonald House Global
  • Who funds NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY
  • Who funds THE SUMMIT FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE NATIONAL WORLD WAR II MUSEUM INC
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN
  • Who funds OceanitesInc
  • Who funds YELLOWSTONE FOREVER
  • Who funds SIGMA KAPPA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds Gateway Foundation Inc
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Dupage Community FoundationIL15.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Dupage Community Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Hale Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Healthy Foods for Healthy Kids Inc14% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Hale Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Hale Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 84 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph