Skip to content

· Private foundation

Haglage Charitable Trust Agency

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$140k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$41k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$1.4MHealth$519kHuman Services$105kInternational$59kEducation$42kYouth Development$16kArts & Culture$6kRecreation & Sports$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $116k
$8,500
Median grant
7
States reached
$918k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COLONIAL PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$40,500
ELAM MINISTRIES$30,000
HEALING HOUSE$20,000
VALUE UNCONDITIONAL$15,000
LORICA MINISTRIES$10,000
PROFESSIONALS IN CHRISTIAN PHILANTH$8,500
CAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRISTCRU MINIST$5,000
SALVATION ARMY OF KANSAS CITY KS$5,000
YOUNG LIFE INTERNATIONAL$4,000
UKRAINE PARTNERSHIP FOUNDATION$3,500
PERCEPTION FUNDING$1,000
AVENUE OF LIFE$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $456k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%AVENUE OF LIFE: $8k → 16%VALUE UNCONDITIONAL: $15k → 8%AVENUE OF LIFE: $6k → 16%AVENUE OF LIFE: $6k → 16%HOPE CENTER: $10k → 15%AVENUE OF LIFE: $5k → 16%HOPE CENTER: $8k → 15%AVENUE OF LIFE: $5k → 16%HOPE CENTER: $5k → 15%AVENUE OF LIFE: $1k → 16%AVENUE OF LIFE: $1k → 16%AVENUE OF LIFE: $500 → 16%AVENUE OF LIFE: $250 → 16%HEALING HOUSE: $85k → 15%HEALING HOUSE: $75k → 15%HEALING HOUSE: $60k → 15%HEALING HOUSE: $50k → 15%HEALING HOUSE: $50k → 15%HEALING HOUSE: $26k → 15%HEALING HOUSE: $20k → 15%HEALING HOUSE: $13k → 15%HEALING HOUSE: $8k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.1M · 19 repeat orgs$65k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +85% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
7

Total granted

$2.1M
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+85%
+15%

Still filing today

42%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $43k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHuman ServicesEducationHealthYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EM
    Elam Ministries
    8× · 2017–2025 · $695k · revenue +67%
  • HH
    HEALING HOUSE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $386k · revenue +120%
  • AO
    AVENUE OF LIFE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $32k · revenue +138%

Funded once

  • FF
    FREEDOM FIRE MINISTRIES INC
    one grant, 2017 · $8k
  • KC
    KANSAS CITY YOUNG MATRONS
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +3%
  • TC
    THE CULTURE HOUSE INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $3k · revenue +15%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
L I F E Ministries Inc Community Pregnancy Center

Our mission is to affirm life through evangelism, education, counseling and practical assistance.

Health
2
The Urban Alternative

The Urban Alternative is a Christian Ministry that seeks to equip, empower, and unite Christians to impact individuals, families, churches, and communities for the rebuilding of lives from the inside out.

Religion
3
Washington Prayer Coalition

to spread the gospel to the world by planting and serving churches, training local Christian leaders and to transform the world through prayer,

Religion
4
Frontlines Ministries

Connecting biblical soul care to missions through the local church.

Religion
5
Alongside Inc

Restore hope, purpose, passion and relationships among Christian leaders who are making an impact around the world.

Religion
6
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
7
Peacemaker Ministries

To equip and assist christians and their churches to respond to conflict biblically.

International
8
Hope Faith Ministries Inc

Hope Faith Ministries Inc. works to alleviate homelessness and poverty in the Kansas City area by providing basic necessities and assistance while also providing critical programs to help empower individ

Human Services
9
Refuge Kc Inc

We exist to welcome our new-American neighbors with Gospel-focused ministries of mercy so they might know, love, and follow Jesus into His Kingdom

Religion
10
Church Assistance Ministry

Church Assistance Ministry helps churches in the USA and around the world to multiply their impact by providing leadership development assistance for church leaders and denominations, and church focused missions.

Religion
11
10000 Fathers Inc

The ministry exists to awaken worship leaders to become spiritual fathers and mothers in the local church through training, coaching, and discipleship.

Religion
12
Hope Alive Inc

Christ-based ministry with the mission of bringing hope and encouragement with christ-like love to emotionally hurting people through mental health counseling and transitonal housing for homeless women with mental illness.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Freedom House Ministries; the most unlike its peers is The Citywide Prayer Movement. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
13/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COLONIAL PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $362,750 · OtherCOLONIAL PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHCAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST: $132,500 · OtherCAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRISTADVICE AID PREGNANCY CENTER: $132,500 · OtherADVICE AID PREGNANCY CENTERCHILD EVANGELISM FELLOWSHIP: $74,200 · OtherCHILD EVANGELISM FELLOWSHIPYOUNG LIFE INTERNATIONAL: $54,000 · OtherYOUNG LIFE INTERNATIONALINTERNATIONAL STUDENTS INC: $41,500 · OtherPROJECT RESTORATION: $37,500 · Other+11 more: $88,700 · Other+11 moreElam Ministries: $695,000 · ReligionElam MinistriesPastorServe Inc: $28,500 · Religion+3 more: $33,500 · ReligionHEALING HOUSE INC: $386,000 · Human ServicesHEALING HOUSE INCAVENUE OF LIFE INC: $32,250 · Human ServicesAVENUE OF LIFE INCTHE HOPE CENTER INC: $22,500 · Human Services+1 more: $15,000 · Human ServicesFREEDOM HOUSE MINISTRIES: $25,000 · EducationUKRAINE PARTNERSHIP FOUNDATION: $3,500 · EducationBETHESDA FOUNDATION INC: $18,400 · HealthTHE CULTURE HOUSE INC: $3,000 · Arts & CultureFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $3,000 · Youth Development
Other$923,650Religion$757,000Human Services$455,750Education$28,500Health$18,400Arts & Culture$3,000Youth Development$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetElam Ministries: $695,000 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetHEALING HOUSE INC: $386,000 over 9y, 3.0% of budgetAVENUE OF LIFE INC: $32,250 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetPastorServe Inc: $28,500 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetFREEDOM HOUSE MINISTRIES: $25,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetTHE CITYWIDE PRAYER MOVEMENT: $22,500 over 4y, 6.2% of budgetTHE HOPE CENTER INC: $22,500 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetBETHESDA FOUNDATION INC: $18,400 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetLorica Ministries: $10,000 over 1y, 8.6% of budgetKANSAS CITY YOUNG MATRONS: $5,200 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetUKRAINE PARTNERSHIP FOUNDATION: $3,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CULTURE HOUSE INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GLOBAL ORPHAN PROJECT INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCity Union Mission: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKansans For Life Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Elam Ministries ↗
  • Who funds HEALING HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds AVENUE OF LIFE INC ↗
  • Who funds PastorServe Inc ↗
  • Who funds FREEDOM HOUSE MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds THE CITYWIDE PRAYER MOVEMENT ↗
  • Who funds THE HOPE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds BETHESDA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Value Unconditional Inc ↗
  • Who funds Lorica Ministries ↗
  • Who funds KANSAS CITY YOUNG MATRONS ↗
  • Who funds UKRAINE PARTNERSHIP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE CULTURE HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
  • Who funds THE GLOBAL ORPHAN PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds PERCEPTION FUNDING INC ↗
  • Who funds City Union Mission ↗
  • Who funds Kansans For Life Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Servant FoundationKS29.3× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · The Signatry Charitable Trust · Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Harry J Lloyd Charitable Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Haglage Charitable Trust Agency funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Haglage Charitable Trust Agency. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Haglage Charitable Trust Agency?

    Find your warmest path to Haglage Charitable Trust Agency through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Haglage Charitable Trust Agency’s filings →

    More from the funding graph