· Private foundation
Hagar Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k11 grants · $33k
- $10k–50k11 grants · $192k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $107k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Childrens Hospital | $55,000 |
| Tilly's Life Center | $51,500 |
| Various Orgs 1500 or Less | $39,500 |
| Rainbow Babies Children's Hospital | $20,000 |
| Hana Youth Center | $20,000 |
| Miracle Fights for Kids | $20,000 |
| Three Square Food Bank | $17,000 |
| Maka Hana Ka'Ike | $15,000 |
| A Keiki's Aloha Foundation | $15,000 |
| HUGS | $15,000 |
| A KeiKi's Aloha Foundation | $10,000 |
| Keep Memory Alive | $10,000 |
| Homeward Bound of Marin | $10,000 |
| Ambassadors of Hope Opportunity | $7,500 |
| Ka Lima O Maui | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 36% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +74% since the first grant, against +32% for the ones you funded once.
46 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2024, 25 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $54k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MKMA KA HANA KA IKE BUILDING PROGRAM5× · 2018–2024 · $70k · revenue +105%
- HYHANA YOUTH CENTER3× · 2022–2024 · $40k · revenue +6%
RITTER CENTER6× · 2017–2024 · $25k · revenue +110%
Funded once
- MHMONTESSORI HALE O KEIKI INCone grant, 2017 · $25k
- TAThe Albertsons Foundationone grant, 2021 · $25k
- MKMa Ka Hanna Ka 'Ikeone grant, 2017 · $20k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.
To end hunger and transform the health of our community by providing nourishment to those in need by acquiring and distributing safe nutritious food via local agencies and by providing education to solve hunger and nutritional problems in…
To provide food to all in need through community partnerships and hunger relief programs. Our vision is a hunger-free Larimer County.
The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…
Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…
Nourish people. build solutions. empower communities. no one goes hungry.
We serve as a champion for addressing the root causes of hunger, delivering neighbor-centric solutions, and fostering collaborative partnerships across all sectors of society for New Jersey.
The organization's mission is to mobilize resources to fight hunger in our community. to fulfill its mission, the food bank:* sources and acquires nutritious food and other products and distribute them to people experiencing nutrition…
The Food Bank of Eastern Michigan's mission is to be the Food Source for people in need. Partnering with organizations to feed the hungry, we advocate and build a community solution to a community problem. By leveraging an abundance of…
Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.
Second harvest food bank's mission is to end hunger and malnutrition by educating and involving the community.
The maryland food bank is a nonprofit hunger-relief organization dedicated to feeding people, strengthening communities, and ending hunger for more marylanders.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feeding America Tampa Bay Inc and the most unlike its peers is Core. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
56 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 56 of the 96 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MA KA HANA KA IKE BUILDING PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds AMBASSADORS OF HOPE AND OPPORTUNITY ↗
- Who funds THREE SQUARE ↗
- Who funds TILLY'S LIFE CENTER ↗
- Who funds HANA YOUTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds Ka Lima O Maui Ltd ↗
- Who funds MONTESSORI HALE O KEIKI INC ↗
- Who funds RITTER CENTER ↗
- Who funds Homeward Bound of Marin ↗
- Who funds The Houston Food Bank ↗
- Who funds SAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds AKRON-CANTON REGIONAL FOODBANK ↗
- Who funds MAUI FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds CORE ↗
- Who funds Enriching Lives Through Music ↗
- Who funds Food Bank of El Dorado County ↗
- Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF HAWAII ↗
- Who funds REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC ↗
- Who funds SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds MUSICARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FOOD IN NEED OF DISTRIBUTION INC ↗
- Who funds SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND ↗
- Who funds ST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds CHP 11-99 FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Marin Community Foundation · The Albertsons Companies Foundation · Fullerton Family Foundation · The Red Cabin Foundation Trust · Leonard & Beryl Buck Foundation · The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Impactassetsinc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Hagar Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Greater Boston Food Bank Inc — 22% of income from government
- Feeding America Tampa Bay Inc — 2% of income from government
- Second Harvest Food Bank of Central Florida Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Hagar Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Hagar Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.