Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hackett Philanthropies Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$208k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$125k
Largest
01What it funds
0183% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$340kEducation$212kHealth$177kCrime & Legal$160kHuman Services$82kEnvironment$78kFood & Nutrition$50kRecreation & Sports$22kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $45k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $125k
$1,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WITTENBERG UNIVERSITY$125,000
BREHM FOUNDATION$25,000
NORTH BRANCH LAND TRUST$10,000
FORK OVER LOVE$10,000
WYOMING VALLEY CATHOLIC YOUTH CENTER$7,500
COMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE$7,500
CANCER WELLNESS CENTER OF NEPA$5,000
COMMONWEALTH FOUNDATION$5,000
NEPA RACING INC$4,500
BIG BROTHER BIG SISTER$1,200
OPERATION HEAD STRONG$1,000
COFFEE INCLUSIVE$1,000
POLAND MOUNTAIN UNITED WAY$1,000
ADOPT A SINGLE MOTHER$1,000
PA FUTURE EDUCATORS ASSOCIATION$750
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $198k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%LET THERE BE MOM: $10k → 10%CASA OF LUZERNE COUNTY: $40k → 15%CASA OF LUZERNE COUNTY: $25k → 15%CASA OF LUZERNE COUNTY: $25k → 15%CASA OF LUZERNE COUNTY: $25k → 15%HELPING HANDS SOCIETY: $5k → 15%CASA OF LUZERNE COUNTY: $15k → 15%CASA OF LUZERNE COUNTY: $10k → 15%CASA OF LUZERNE COUNTY: $10k → 15%HELPING HANDS SOCIETY: $1k → 15%CASA OF LUZERNE COUNTY: $10k → 15%CASA OF LUZERNE COUNTY: $460 → 15%CANCER WELLNESS CENTER OF NEPA: $15k → 15%CANCER WELLNESS CENTER OF NEPA: $5k → 15%ADOPT A SINGLE MOTHER: $1k → 15%ADOPT A SINGLE MOTHER: $1k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
UT
VA
DE
SC
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 33 repeat orgs$169k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +46% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

33 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
46

Total granted

$1.1M
$165k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+13%

Still filing today

45%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationRecreation & SportsEnvironmentArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    CASA OF WYOMING VALLEY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $160k · revenue +55%
  • TB
    THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF WITTENBERG COLLEGE
    3× · 2021–2025 · $130k · revenue +3%
  • MF
    MATERNAL & FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES INC
    5× · 2017–2023 · $61k · revenue +61%

Funded once

  • VI
    VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINEgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue +38%
  • OC
    OPERATION CHRISTMAS CARD
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • HO
    HOUSE OF RUTHgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +95%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
2
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

—
3
Gettysburg College

Gettysburg college is a residential, undergraduate college of the liberal arts and sciences.

Education
4
Wheaton College

Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…

Education
5
Widener University

Empowering our community of learners to discover and create better futures.

Education
6
Worcester Polytechnic Institute

Wpi transforms lives, turns knowledge into action to confront global challenges, and revolutionizes stem through distinctive and inclusive education, projects and research. (http://www.wpi.edu/about/mission.html)

—
7
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
8
Northeastern Pennsylvania Educational Television Association

Wvia public media is a catalyst, convener and educator, using media, partnerships, powerful ideas and programs to improve lives and advance the best attributes of an enlightened society.

Arts & Culture
9
Western Pennsylvania Conservancy

The western pennsylvania conservancy protects and restores exceptional places to provide our region with clean waters and healthy forests, wildlife and natural areas for the benefit of present and future generations. the conservancy…

Environment
10
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
11
The College of Wooster

The college of wooster is a community of independent minds, working together to prepare students to become leaders of character and influence in an interdependent global community. (continued on schedule o)we engage motivated students in a…

Education
12
Waynesburg University

Waynesburg university educates students to make connections between faith, learning and serving so they might faithfully transofrm their communiities and the world. see continuation on schedule o.as a christian comprehensive university, we…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Luzerne Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Hazleton Art League. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 86 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
39/39
Grantees still filing
24/39
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GEISINGER FOUNDATION: $145,000 · OtherGEISINGER FOUNDATIONUNITED WAY: $106,250 · OtherUNITED WAYCOMMONWEALTH FOUNDATION: $50,000 · OtherCOMMONWEALTH FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $48,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBREHM FOUNDATION: $48,000 · OtherBREHM FOUNDATIONALLIED SERVICE FOUNDATION: $31,810 · OtherMISCELLANEOUS: $25,500 · Other+57 more: $179,925 · Other+57 moreTHE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF WITTENBERG COLLEGE: $130,250 · EducationTHE BOARD OF DIRECT…CRESTWOOD EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $70,000 · EducationCRESTWOOD EDUCATION…THE LUZERNE FOUNDATION: $32,750 · EducationTHE LUZERNE FOUNDAT…+2 more: $2,500 · EducationCASA OF WYOMING VALLEY: $160,460 · Human ServicesCASA OF WYOMING …THE CANCER WELLNESS CENTER OF NEPA: $20,000 · Human ServicesTHE CANCER WELLN…LET THERE BE MOM INC: $10,000 · Human Services+2 more: $8,000 · Human ServicesMATERNAL & FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES INC: $60,500 · HealthMATERNAL & …VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE: $50,000 · HealthVOLUNTEERS …WYOMING VALLEY CHILDREN'S ASSOCIATION: $22,725 · HealthWYOMING VAL…+3 more: $4,250 · HealthNORTH BRANCH LAND TRUST: $70,000 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF THE REEDY RIVER INC: $7,000 · EnvironmentFORK OVER LOVE INC: $50,000 · Food & NutritionNATIONAL ABILITY CENTER: $11,000 · Recreation & SportsNEPA RACING INC: $8,700 · Recreation & Sports+1 more: $500 · Recreation & Sports
Other$634,485Education$235,500Human Services$198,460Health$137,475Environment$77,000Food & Nutrition$50,000Recreation & Sports$20,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCASA OF WYOMING VALLEY: $160,460 over 9y, 8.3% of budgetTHE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF WITTENBERG COLLEGE: $130,250 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH BRANCH LAND TRUST: $70,000 over 9y, 2.2% of budgetCRESTWOOD EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $70,000 over 2y, 58% of budgetMATERNAL & FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES INC: $60,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFORK OVER LOVE INC: $50,000 over 5y, 4.1% of budgetVOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE: $50,000 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetTHE LUZERNE FOUNDATION: $32,750 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetWYOMING VALLEY CHILDREN'S ASSOCIATION: $22,725 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetTHE CANCER WELLNESS CENTER OF NEPA: $20,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetCOMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE: $12,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL ABILITY CENTER: $11,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHOUSE OF RUTH: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLET THERE BE MOM INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetNEPA RACING INC: $8,700 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetKEYSTONE COLLEGE: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE REEDY RIVER INC: $7,000 over 1y, 25% of budgetTHE HELPING HANDS SOCIETY OF HAZLETON AREA SCHUYLKILL AND CARBON COUNTY INC: $6,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetBOLD GOLD BROADCAST AND MEDIA FOUND: $5,000 over 1y, 9.0% of budgetAMY KROUSE ROSENTHAL FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetTHE URBAN INSTITUTE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAZLETON ART LEAGUE: $3,500 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER WYOMING VALLEY AREA YMCA: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetADOPT A SINGLE MOM PROJECT: $2,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetIMMANUEL CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCATO INSTITUTE: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOFFEE INCLUSIVE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetESOPHAGEAL CANCER AWARENESS ASSOCIATION: $1,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetWILKES UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPATRIOTS COVE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInstitute for Humane Studies: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES WRESTLING FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKISS THEATRE CO: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNORTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING WESTCHESTER INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS INC: $240 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CASA OF WYOMING VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF WITTENBERG COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds NORTH BRANCH LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds CRESTWOOD EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MATERNAL & FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds FORK OVER LOVE INC ↗
  • Who funds VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE ↗
  • Who funds THE LUZERNE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WYOMING VALLEY CHILDREN'S ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds THE CANCER WELLNESS CENTER OF NEPA ↗
  • Who funds COMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ABILITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds HOUSE OF RUTH ↗
  • Who funds LET THERE BE MOM INC ↗
  • Who funds NEPA RACING INC ↗
  • Who funds KEYSTONE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE REEDY RIVER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HELPING HANDS SOCIETY OF HAZLETON AREA SCHUYLKILL AND CARBON COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds BOLD GOLD BROADCAST AND MEDIA FOUND ↗
  • Who funds Donors Trust Inc ↗
  • Who funds AMY KROUSE ROSENTHAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE URBAN INSTITUTE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Tambur Family FoundationPA32.6× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Tambur Family Foundation · Allone Charities · The Luzerne Foundation · William G McGowan Charitable Fund · Sordoni Family Foundation · The Blackhorse Foundation · Allone Foundation · Benco Family Foundation Fka Cohen Family Charitable Foundation · Moses Taylor Foundation Inc · Ppl Foundation · Benevento and Mayo Foundation · Maslow Family Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hackett Philanthropies Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hackett Philanthropies Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Hackett Philanthropies Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Hackett Philanthropies Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 86 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hackett Philanthropies’ filings →

    More from the funding graph