· Private foundation
Maslow Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k15 grants · $86k
- $10k–50k47 grants · $865k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $170k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GREATER PHILADELPHIA FILM OFFICE | $65,000 |
| CIRCLE CENTER FOR THE ARTS | $55,000 |
| BLUE CHIP FARM ANIMAL REFUGE | $50,000 |
| MARYWOOD UNIVERSITY | $40,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $40,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $30,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $30,000 |
| WYOMING SEMINARY COLLEGE PREPARATOR | $27,500 |
| DESIGNED2INSPIRE | $25,000 |
| INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN RESOURCES | $25,000 |
| RESCUE RANCH | $25,000 |
| WVIA | $25,000 |
| MISERICORDIA UNIVERSITY | $25,000 |
| PARKINSON'S DISEASE FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| BURLINGTON CITY ARTS | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $415k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
83 repeat relationships — 61 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $75k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MUMISERICORDIA UNIVERSITY8× · 2017–2025 · $165k · revenue +48%
- WUWILKES UNIVERSITY9× · 2017–2025 · $162k · revenue +15%
- PIPARTNERS IN ADVENTURE INC9× · 2017–2025 · $138k · revenue +23%
Funded once
- CMCOLLEGE MISERICORDIA AUTISM LIFELONG LEARNINGone grant, 2019 · $20k
- PVPARKINSON VOICE PROJECT INCgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +33%
- DPDAVIS PHINNEY FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +42%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The western pennsylvania conservancy protects and restores exceptional places to provide our region with clean waters and healthy forests, wildlife and natural areas for the benefit of present and future generations. the conservancy…
The mission of the adamstown library is to maintain and improve the quality of life in our community by providing access to cultural, intellectual, and informational resources and programs to promote life-long learning for all ages. the…
Public lending library
See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…
The mission of penn highlands mon valley is to enhance the health of the residents of the mid-monongahela valley area by providing outstanding healthcare services.
Humane pennsylvania empowers the people in our communities to increase their capacity to care for animals so that all animals are healthy, safe, and treated humanely.
Public lending library
The north care women's clinic is a non-profit licensed medical clinic offering help, hope and healing to people experiencing an unexpected pregnancy. our mission is to compassionately empower individuals to make healthy and informed…
Wrc pennsylvania memorial home's mission is to provide choices for generations. built on a not-for-profit foundation of caring, the organization offers residential and personal care, home and community-based services, skilled and…
Our community-based and controlled health care system exists to improve regional access to a wide array of premier primary care and advanced health services while supporting a reverence for life and the worth and dignity of each individual.
To create and distribute trusted content, build connections and strengthen our community through public media.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Luzerne Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Music Box Players. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
54 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 54 of the 103 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MISERICORDIA UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds WILKES UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds PARTNERS IN ADVENTURE INC ↗
- Who funds INCLUSIVE ARTS VERMONT INC ↗
- Who funds Marywood University ↗
- Who funds PARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BURLINGTON CITY ARTS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NORTH BRANCH LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds Greater Philadelphia Film Office ↗
- Who funds CASA OF WYOMING VALLEY ↗
- Who funds BACK MOUNTAIN FOOD PANTRY ↗
- Who funds INDRALOKA ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC ↗
- Who funds RESCUE RANCH ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTARY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CORI'S PLACE ↗
- Who funds PITTSTON MEMORIAL LIBRARY ↗
- Who funds OSTERHOUT FREE LIBRARY ↗
- Who funds NORTH COUNTRY SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds MARLEY'S MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDRENS SVC CTR OF WYOM VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER WILKES BARRE ASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND D/B/A NORTHEAST SIGHT SERVICES ↗
- Who funds DINNERS FOR KIDS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Tambur Family Foundation · The Luzerne Foundation · Moses Taylor Foundation Inc · William G McGowan Charitable Fund · Joseph and Erma Paglianite Charitable Foundation · The Blackhorse Foundation · Allone Foundation · Allone Charities · Nesbitt Family Charitable Foundation · Sordoni Family Foundation · Benco Family Foundation Fka Cohen Family Charitable Foundation · Joseph B and Virginia H Banks Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Maslow Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Family Nurturing Center Rogue Valley Children's Relief Nursery — 38% of income from government
- Burlington City Arts Foundation Inc — 6% of income from government
- Inclusive Arts Vermont Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Maslow Family Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Maslow Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.