· Private foundation
Benevento and Mayo Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k7 grants · $19k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $62k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WYOMING VALLEY CHILDRENS ASSOCIATION | $50,000 |
| GEISINGER HEALTH FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| CENTER FOR THERAPEUTIC RIDING | $20,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF WYOMING VALLEY | $12,000 |
| CASA OF LUZERNE COUNTY | $10,000 |
| NAVITY MIGUEL SCRANTON | $10,000 |
| SOUTHHAMPTON DAY CARE CENTER | $10,000 |
| AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY | $8,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| SPCA OF LUZERNE COUNTY | $1,500 |
| OSTERHOUT FREE LIBRARY | $1,000 |
| FORK OVER LOVE | $1,000 |
| THINK BIG PEDIATRIC CANCER | $1,000 |
| LUZERNE FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $124k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 86% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
23 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GHGEISINGER HEALTH5× · 2020–2024 · $253k · revenue +118%
- UWUNITED WAY OF WYOMING VALLEY6× · 2017–2024 · $62k · revenue +150%
- WVWYOMING VALLEY CHILDREN'S ASSOCIATION3× · 2017–2024 · $61k · revenue +29%
Funded once
- PAPENNSYLVANIA AL-ANON ASSEMBLY AL-ANON FAMILY GROUPS INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +40%
- ACALLONE CHARITIES FOUNDATIONone grant, 2020 · $10k
- RMRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF SCRANTON INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +25%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Humane pennsylvania empowers the people in our communities to increase their capacity to care for animals so that all animals are healthy, safe, and treated humanely.
Providing comprehensive home-based and facility based hospice care to children and adults with life limiting and life threatening illnesses in southeastern pennsylvania. in addition, keystone hospice provides residential care through…
We heal, comfort and care for the people of our community by providing advanced and compassionate health care of superior quality and value supported by education and clinical research.
The mission of penn highlands mon valley is to enhance the health of the residents of the mid-monongahela valley area by providing outstanding healthcare services.
Provide a safe and caring program for youth that inspires hope for the future and stresses personal responsibility within an atmosphere of respect for everyone.
The provision of management services to the chester county hospital and its affiliates.
UPMC Williamsport is a subsidiary of UPMC Susquehanna. The mission of UPMC Susquehanna and its subsidiaries is to serve the community by providing outstanding patient care and shaping tomorrow's health care through clinical and…
Providing administrative services to its two subsidiaries, keystone hospice and keystone home health, llc. providing social services to medically fragile populations in southeastern pennsylvania.
Our community-based and controlled health care system exists to improve regional access to a wide array of premier primary care and advanced health services while supporting a reverence for life and the worth and dignity of each individual.
Penn state health hampden medical center's mission is to continually improve the health and well-being of the people in pennsylvania. the organization provides patients with excellent, compassionate and culturally responsive and equitable…
Children's services
The mission of upmc western maryland is to serve our community by providing outstanding patient care and to shape tomorrow's health system through clinical & technological innovation, research and education.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Wyoming Valley and the most unlike its peers is Osterhout Free Library. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 22. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 16% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds KING'S COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds GEISINGER HEALTH ↗
- Who funds CASA OF WYOMING VALLEY ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF WYOMING VALLEY ↗
- Who funds WYOMING VALLEY CHILDREN'S ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds FORK OVER LOVE INC ↗
- Who funds WYOMING SEMINARY COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds MATERNAL & FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds THE LUZERNE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CAMP ORCHARD HILL INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHAMPTON DAY CARE FOUNTAIN OF YOUTH INC ↗
- Who funds ULMAN FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MERCY HOUSE OF THE SOUTHERN TIER INC ↗
- Who funds OSTERHOUT FREE LIBRARY ↗
- Who funds PENNSYLVANIA AL-ANON ASSEMBLY AL-ANON FAMILY GROUPS INC ↗
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF SCRANTON INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds THE CANCER WELLNESS CENTER OF NEPA ↗
- Who funds THE SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS OF LUZERNE COUNTY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Allone Charities · Benco Family Foundation Fka Cohen Family Charitable Foundation · The Tambur Family Foundation · Hackett Philanthropies Foundation · Maslow Family Foundation Inc · Sordoni Family Foundation · Allone Foundation · William G McGowan Charitable Fund · The Luzerne Foundation · Nesbitt Family Charitable Foundation · The Blackhorse Foundation · Moses Taylor Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Benevento and Mayo Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Benevento and Mayo Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Benevento and Mayo Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.