Skip to content
Hacienda Child Development Fund at a glance

· Private foundation

Hacienda Child Development Fund

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$9k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Youth Development$34kHealth$27kEducation$22kArts & Culture$14kHousing & Shelter$11kRecreation & Sports$11kHuman Services$11kInternational$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$9k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TRI VALLEY REACH INC$2,500
THREE VALLEYS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$2,500
CHILDREN OF GRACE$1,000
MORRIS MEMORIAL FOUNDATION$1,000
KENNEDY KING MEM SCHOLARSHIP FUND$1,000
QUEST SCIENCE CENTER$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–23, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%PLEDGE TO HUMANITY: $2k → 9%TEEN ESTEEM: $2k → 9%TEEN ESTEEM: $1k → 9%TEEN ESTEEM: $1k → 9%AVHS SENIOR CLASS PARENTS: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$114k · 23 repeat orgs$29k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against +5% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
23

Total granted

$114k
$29k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+5%

Still filing today

52%
52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHealthEducationHuman ServicesInternationalHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    SUNFLOWER HILL
    6× · 2018–2023 · $10k · revenue +41%
  • TM
    THE MORRIS MEMORIAL FOUNDATION
    7× · 2018–2024 · $7k · revenue +2%
  • PC
    PACIFIC CHAMBER ORCHESTRA
    2× · 2018–2019 · $6k · revenue +81%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $4k
  • NC
    NORTHERN CALIFORNIA BLEEDING DISORDERS FOUNDATION FORMERLY HEMOPHILIA FOUNDTN
    one grant, 2018 · $3k · revenue -10%
  • SC
    SKYLAND COMMUNITY CHURCH
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Castro Valley Educational Foundation

Provide resources for educational activities beyond the standard curriculum and to provide independent funding for worthy educational programs affected by budget reductions. Sponsor educational activities that provide additional…

—
2
The Valley Foundation
—
3
Placer Community Foundation

The Placer Community Foundation grows local giving to strengthen our community.

Philanthropy
4
Kiwanis Club of San Leandro Foundation
Philanthropy
5
Green Foothills Foundation dba Green Foothills

Our mission is to protect local nature and farmland to ensure a healthy environment for everyone.

—
6
Sutter Bay Medical Foundation

Mission statement: mission: caring for our patients first and our people always. vision: to be the most comprehensive, integrated and connected health system for getting and staying well. values: excellence - we deliver high-quality,…

Health
7
California Transportation Foundation

At California Transportation Foundation (CTF) our mission is simple. We recognize the best and brightest in our industry with our Annual CTF Transportation Awards program. We remember those who have given all in service to the people of…

—
8
Sage Valley Golf Foundation
Recreation & Sports
9
Valley Health Foundation (Vhf)

Valley health foundation (vhf) is a non-profit leader in community health and healthcare that fundraises to support, innovate, and advocate for better health for all in santa clara county. vhf helps patients, families, and dedicated…

Health
10
San Jose Chamber Music Society

To present chamber music concerts in San Jose performed by top ensembles from the Bay Area, across America, and around the world. To enrich our audience experience through post-concert Q&As, program notes, and meet-the-composer…

—
11
Summit Bank Foundation

To garner funds in support of research at the UCSF Helen Diller Comprehensive Cancer Research Center. To aid doctors in finding a cure and provide financial assistance for innovation and progressive research. To provide scholarships to…

Philanthropy
12
Voices of Silicon Valley

Community Music / Arts Organization

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northern California Bleeding Disorders Foundation Formerly Hemophilia Foundtn; the most unlike its peers is Avhs Senior Class Parents. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/26
Grantees still filing
18/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TRI VALLEY SPECIAL NEEDSREACH: $12,500 · OtherTRI VALLEY SPECIAL NEEDSREACHFIRST TEE OF THE TRI VALLEY: $11,500 · OtherFIRST TEE OF THE TRI VALLEYKIDS-N-NEED: $7,500 · OtherKIDS-N-NEEDLAS TRAMPAS INC ID#94-1437727: $7,500 · OtherLAS TRAMPAS INC ID#94-1437727KENNEDY KING MEM SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $6,000 · OtherKENNEDY KING MEM SCHOLARSHIP FUNDCARONDELET HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $3,500 · OtherQUEST SCIENCE CENTER: $4,000 · OtherThe Go Green Initiative Association: $3,862 · Other+22 more: $33,050 · Other+22 moreSUNFLOWER HILL: $10,250 · HealthSUNFLOWER H…NORTHERN CALIFORNIA BLEEDING DISORDERS FOUNDATION FORMERLY HEMOPHILIA FOUNDTN: $3,000 · HealthNORTHERN CA…GABLE HEART BEATS FOUNDATION: $1,400 · HealthGABLE HEART…PACIFIC CHAMBER ORCHESTRA: $5,500 · Arts & CultureTri-Valley Community Television Foundation: $3,000 · Arts & CultureVALLEY CONCERT CHORALE: $1,000 · Arts & CultureCANTABELLA CHILDRENS CHORUS: $1,000 · Arts & CultureTHE MORRIS MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $7,000 · PhilanthropyThree Valleys Community Foundation: $2,500 · PhilanthropyTRI-VALLEY REACH INC: $5,000 · Housing & ShelterShepherds Gate: $1,000 · Housing & ShelterTeen Esteem: $3,500 · Human ServicesPledge to Humanity: $1,500 · Human ServicesAVHS SENIOR CLASS PARENTS: $1,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN OF GRACE: $2,878 · InternationalHospital De La Familia Foundation: $2,000 · International
Other$94,412Health$14,650Arts & Culture$10,500Philanthropy$9,500Housing & Shelter$6,000Human Services$6,000International$4,878

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSUNFLOWER HILL: $10,250 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetKIDS-N-NEED: $7,500 over 4y, 5.2% of budgetTHE MORRIS MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $7,000 over 7y, 9.8% of budgetPACIFIC CHAMBER ORCHESTRA: $5,500 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetTRI-VALLEY REACH INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetQUEST SCIENCE CENTER: $4,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetThe Go Green Initiative Association: $3,862 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetTeen Esteem: $3,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetNORTHERN CALIFORNIA BLEEDING DISORDERS FOUNDATION FORMERLY HEMOPHILIA FOUNDTN: $3,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBoys & Girls Clubs of Monterey County: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTri-Valley Community Television Foundation: $3,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetCHILDREN OF GRACE: $2,878 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetThree Valleys Community Foundation: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHospital De La Familia Foundation: $2,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPLEASANTON PARTNERSHIPS IN EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGABLE HEART BEATS FOUNDATION: $1,400 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetLas Positas College Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF ALAMEDA COUNTY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAVHS SENIOR CLASS PARENTS: $1,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetVALLEY CONCERT CHORALE: $1,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetShepherds Gate: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANTABELLA CHILDRENS CHORUS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPartners Fore Golf Inc The First Tee Tri-Valley: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSentinels of Freedom Scholarship Foundation: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIVERMORE PLEASANTON SPORTSMEN INC: $500 over 1y, 3.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SUNFLOWER HILL ↗
  • Who funds KIDS-N-NEED ↗
  • Who funds THE MORRIS MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PACIFIC CHAMBER ORCHESTRA ↗
  • Who funds TRI-VALLEY REACH INC ↗
  • Who funds QUEST SCIENCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds The Go Green Initiative Association ↗
  • Who funds Teen Esteem ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN CALIFORNIA BLEEDING DISORDERS FOUNDATION FORMERLY HEMOPHILIA FOUNDTN ↗
  • Who funds Boys & Girls Clubs of Monterey County ↗
  • Who funds Tri-Valley Community Television Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN OF GRACE ↗
  • Who funds Three Valleys Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Hospital De La Familia Foundation ↗
  • Who funds PLEASANTON PARTNERSHIPS IN EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Pledge to Humanity ↗
  • Who funds GABLE HEART BEATS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Las Positas College Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS OF ALAMEDA COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds AVHS SENIOR CLASS PARENTS ↗
  • Who funds VALLEY CONCERT CHORALE ↗
  • Who funds Shepherds Gate ↗
  • Who funds CANTABELLA CHILDRENS CHORUS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fremont Bank Foundati…Three Valleys Communi…East Bay Community Fo…Silicon Valley Commun…Rotarian Foundation o…The Yelp FoundationThe Albertsons Compan…Marin Community Found…Community Health & Ed…Workday FoundationChubb Charitable Foun…The Blackbaud Giving …
Fremont Bank FoundationCA19.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fremont Bank Foundation · Three Valleys Community Foundation · East Bay Community Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Rotarian Foundation of Livermore · The Yelp Foundation · The Albertsons Companies Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · Community Health & Education Foundation · Workday Foundation · Chubb Charitable Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hacienda Child Development Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hacienda Child Development Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hacienda Child Development’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home