· Private foundation
Hacienda Child Development Fund
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THREE VALLEYS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
| TRI VALLEY REACH INC | $2,500 |
| CHILDREN OF GRACE | $1,000 |
| QUEST SCIENCE CENTER | $1,000 |
| MORRIS MEMORIAL FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| KENNEDY KING MEM SCHOLARSHIP FUND | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–23, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.
23 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SHSUNFLOWER HILL6× · 2018–2023 · $10k · revenue +41%
- TMTHE MORRIS MEMORIAL FOUNDATION7× · 2018–2024 · $7k · revenue +2%
- PCPACIFIC CHAMBER ORCHESTRA2× · 2018–2019 · $6k · revenue +81%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2017 · $4k
- NCNORTHERN CALIFORNIA BLEEDING DISORDERS FOUNDATION FORMERLY HEMOPHILIA FOUNDTNone grant, 2018 · $3k · revenue -10%
- SCSKYLAND COMMUNITY CHURCHone grant, 2017 · $3k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide resources for educational activities beyond the standard curriculum and to provide independent funding for worthy educational programs affected by budget reductions. Sponsor educational activities that provide additional…
The Placer Community Foundation grows local giving to strengthen our community.
Our mission is to protect local nature and farmland to ensure a healthy environment for everyone.
Mission statement: mission: caring for our patients first and our people always. vision: to be the most comprehensive, integrated and connected health system for getting and staying well. values: excellence - we deliver high-quality,…
At California Transportation Foundation (CTF) our mission is simple. We recognize the best and brightest in our industry with our Annual CTF Transportation Awards program. We remember those who have given all in service to the people of…
Valley health foundation (vhf) is a non-profit leader in community health and healthcare that fundraises to support, innovate, and advocate for better health for all in santa clara county. vhf helps patients, families, and dedicated…
To present chamber music concerts in San Jose performed by top ensembles from the Bay Area, across America, and around the world. To enrich our audience experience through post-concert Q&As, program notes, and meet-the-composer…
To garner funds in support of research at the UCSF Helen Diller Comprehensive Cancer Research Center. To aid doctors in finding a cure and provide financial assistance for innovation and progressive research. To provide scholarships to…
Community Music / Arts Organization
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northern California Bleeding Disorders Foundation Formerly Hemophilia Foundtn and the most unlike its peers is Avhs Senior Class Parents. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 22 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SUNFLOWER HILL ↗
- Who funds KIDS-N-NEED ↗
- Who funds THE MORRIS MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PACIFIC CHAMBER ORCHESTRA ↗
- Who funds TRI-VALLEY REACH INC ↗
- Who funds QUEST SCIENCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds The Go Green Initiative Association ↗
- Who funds Teen Esteem ↗
- Who funds Boys & Girls Clubs of Monterey County ↗
- Who funds Tri-Valley Community Television Foundation ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN CALIFORNIA BLEEDING DISORDERS FOUNDATION FORMERLY HEMOPHILIA FOUNDTN ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN OF GRACE ↗
- Who funds Three Valleys Community Foundation ↗
- Who funds PLEASANTON PARTNERSHIPS IN EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Hospital De La Familia Foundation ↗
- Who funds Pledge to Humanity ↗
- Who funds GABLE HEART BEATS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Shepherds Gate ↗
- Who funds VALLEY CONCERT CHORALE ↗
- Who funds CANTABELLA CHILDRENS CHORUS ↗
- Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS OF ALAMEDA COUNTY ↗
- Who funds Las Positas College Foundation ↗
- Who funds Partners Fore Golf Inc The First Tee Tri-Valley ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Fremont Bank Foundation · Three Valleys Community Foundation · East Bay Community Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Rotarian Foundation of Livermore · The Yelp Foundation · The Albertsons Companies Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · Community Health & Education Foundation · Workday Foundation · Chubb Charitable Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Hacienda Child Development Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.