Skip to content
Habitat for Humanity South Carolina at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Habitat for Humanity South Carolina

Seeking to put God's love into action, Habitat for Humanity South Carolina brings people together to build homes, communities, and hope.

$988k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$185k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$1.1M
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $90k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $895k
$90,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Aiken Co Habitat for Humanit$185,094
Habitat for Humanity of Spart$150,000
Lowcountry Habitat for Humani$145,000
Habitat for Humanity of Green$105,000
Central SC HFH$90,099
Habitat for Humanity of York$90,000
Habitat for Humanity of Ander$70,132
Edisto Habitat for Humanity$60,000
Kershaw Habitat For Humanity$30,084
Pickens County Habitat for Hu$30,000
Oconee Habitat for Humanity$30,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 64% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%Habitat for Humanity of York: $90k → 8%Lowcountry Habitat for Humani: $145k → 10%Habitat for Humanity of Green: $105k → 10%HFH of Lancaster County: $804 → 11%Kershaw Habitat For Humanity: $30k → 12%Habitat for Humanity of Spart: $150k → 15%Habitat for Humanity of Ander: $70k → 15%Pickens County Habitat for Hu: $30k → 16%Central SC HFH: $90k → 16%Oconee Habitat for Humanity: $30k → 17%Abbeville McCormick Cty HFH: $6k → 17%Aiken Co Habitat for Humanit: $185k → 17%Laurens County Habitat for Hu: $8k → 18%Darlington County HFH: $1k → 21%Edisto Habitat for Humanity: $60k → 25%HFH of York County: $4k → 8%Habitat for Humanity of Green: $10k → 10%HFH of Kershaw County: $2k → 12%HFH of Spartanburg: $1k → 15%Pickens County Habitat for Hu: $8k → 16%Central SC HFH: $10k → 16%Oconee Habitat for Humanity: $8k → 17%Edisto Habitat For Humanity: $2k → 25%Central SC HFH: $10k → 16%Oconee County HFH: $3k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

60%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$636k · 8 repeat orgs$424k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
5

Total granted

$636k
$24k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
0%

Still filing today

88%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $400k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREENVILLE COUNTY SC INC
    3× · 2020–2025 · $115k · revenue +25%
  • CS
    CENTRAL SC HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
    4× · 2020–2025 · $111k · revenue +45%
  • HF
    Habitat for Humanity of York County Inc
    4× · 2020–2025 · $94k · revenue +37%

Funded once

  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL LAURENS COUNTY
    one grant, 2022 · $8k · revenue 0%
  • OH
    Oconee Habitat for Humanity
    one grant, 2023 · $8k
  • FC
    FULLER CENTER FOR HOUSING OF MCCORMICK SC INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $6k · revenue -10%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Habitat Community Housing Development Inc

Development of affordable housing

—
2
Habitat for Humanity Pennyrile Region Inc

To provide affordable housing and financing to low income families.

Housing & Shelter
3
Habitat for Humanity International Scotts Bluff County

Most construction work is performed by volunteers

—
4
Habitat for Humanity International Inc

To put God's love into action, Habitat for Humanity brings people together to build homes, communities, and hope.

—
5
Hart County Habitat for Humanity

Hart County Habitat for Humanity works in partnership with God, volunteers, and responsible families in need, to build a stronger community by creating decent affordable housing.

—
6
Habitat for Humanity of the San Juans

Provide affordable housing to the disadvantaged

Housing & Shelter
7
Habitat for Humanity International Inc

Seeking to put gods love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

—
8
Fulton Hickman Co Habitat for Humanity Ky Inc

Building houses for low income families through grants and no interest loans.

Housing & Shelter
9
Habitat for Humanity of Central Arkansas Inc

Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities, and hope to realize our vision of a world where everyone has a decent place to live.

Housing & Shelter
10
My New Kentucky Home Habitat for Humanity

To eliminate substandard housing in the tri-county area of marion, nelson and washington by building homes for low income families

—
11
Habitat for Humanity International Wabash County Hfh

Wabash county habitat for humanity, inc. is a non-profit organization working in partnership with god and people everywhere, from all walks of life, to build decent, affordable housing.

—
12
Habitat for Humanity Greater Wenatchee Area

Our mission is to provide decent and affordable housing to eligible families in partnership with god, the families and our community.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Habitat for Humanity of Greenville County Sc Inc; the most unlike its peers is Dillon County Long Term Recove. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/31
Grantees still filing
23/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Aiken County Habitat for Humanity Inc: $185,094 · OtherAiken County Habitat for Humanity IncCENTRAL SC HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $110,553 · OtherCENTRAL SC HABITAT FOR HUMANITYHabitat for Humanity of York County Inc: $94,493 · OtherHabitat for Humanity of York County IncHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF ANDERSON INC: $70,132 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF ANDERSON INCEDISTO HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC: $62,342 · OtherEDISTO HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INCPickens County Habitat for Hu: $38,000 · OtherPickens County Habitat for HuHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL OCONEE COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $32,791 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL KERSHAW COUNTY: $31,656 · Other+3 more: $16,804 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY SPARTANBURG I: $151,341 · Housing & ShelterHABITAT FOR HUMANITY SPARTANBURG ILOWCOUNTRY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $145,000 · Housing & ShelterLOWCOUNTRY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INCHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREENVILLE COUNTY SC INC: $115,000 · Housing & ShelterHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREENVILLE COUNTY SC…+2 more: $7,388 · Housing & Shelter
Other$641,865Housing & Shelter$418,729

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAiken County Habitat for Humanity Inc: $185,094 over 2y, 13% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY SPARTANBURG I: $151,341 over 4y, 7.1% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREENVILLE COUNTY SC INC: $115,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetCENTRAL SC HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $110,553 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetHabitat for Humanity of York County Inc: $94,493 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF ANDERSON INC: $70,132 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetEDISTO HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC: $62,342 over 3y, 19% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL OCONEE COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $32,791 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL KERSHAW COUNTY: $31,656 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL LAURENS COUNTY: $8,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetFULLER CENTER FOR HOUSING OF MCCORMICK SC INC: $5,889 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetDARLINGTON COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $1,499 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF LANCASTER COUNTY INC: $804 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Habitat for Humanity …Publix Super Markets …Central Carolina Comm…Coastal Community Fou…Dominion Energy Chari…United Community Bank…Duke Energy FoundationTd Charitable Foundat…Kuznik Charitable Fou…The Leon Levine Found…Truist Foundation IncFoundation for the Ca…
Habitat for Humanity International IncGA57.7× affinity27 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Habitat for Humanity International Inc · Publix Super Markets Charities Inc · Central Carolina Community Foundation · Coastal Community Foundation of South Carolina Inc · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · United Community Bank Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · Td Charitable Foundation · Kuznik Charitable Foundation · The Leon Levine Foundation · Truist Foundation Inc · Foundation for the Carolinas

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Habitat for Humanity South Carolina funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Habitat for Humanity South Carolina. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Habitat for Humanity South Carolina’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home