Skip to content
Habitat for Humanity of Colorado Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Habitat for Humanity of Colorado Inc

Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

$7.4M
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$1.4M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$16MHealth$60k
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $30k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $1.2M
  • $250k+7 grants · $6.2M
$212,852
Median grant
2
States reached
$9.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GREELEY-WELD HFH OF CO$1,436,000
METRO DENVER HFH OF CO$1,284,827
ROARING FORK VALLEY$1,142,000
VAIL VALLEY HFH OF CO$1,057,000
ST VRAIN VALLEY HFH OF CO$611,070
PIKES PEAK HFH OF CO$430,000
FORT COLLINS HFH OF CO$269,000
MESA COUNTY HFH OF CO$212,852
LOVELAND HFH OF CO$210,000
FLATIRONS HFH OF CO$210,000
ARCHULETA COUNTY HFH OF CO$150,000
SAN JUANS HFH$144,000
GRAND COUNTY HFH OF CO$122,069
GUNNISON VALLEY HFH OF CO$120,000
HFH OF LARAMIE COUNTY INC$30,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 60% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL: $40k → 22%FLATIRONS HFH OF CO: $210k → 5%GRAND COUNTY HFH OF CO: $122k → 7%VAIL VALLEY HFH OF CO: $1.3M → 7%ROARING FORK VALLEY: $1.1M → 8%PIKES PEAK HFH OF CO: $430k → 9%SUMMIT HFH OF CO: $130k → 9%GREELEY-WELD HFH OF CO: $1.4M → 9%ARCHULETA COUNTY HFH OF CO: $158k → 10%MESA COUNTY HFH OF CO: $460k → 11%LOVELAND HFH OF CO: $369k → 11%SAN JUANS HFH: $144k → 12%ST VRAIN VALLEY HFH OF CO: $611k → 12%METRO DENVER HFH OF CO: $1.3M → 12%PUEBLO HFH OF CO: $30k → 15%SAN LUIS VALLEY HFH OF CO: $58k → 17%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL: $33k → 22%FLATIRONS HFH OF CO: $150k → 5%GUNNISON VALLEY HFH OF CO: $120k → 7%VAIL VALLEY HFH OF CO: $1.1M → 7%ROARING FORK VALLEY: $670k → 8%PIKES PEAK HFH OF CO: $344k → 9%SUMMIT HFH OF CO: $60k → 9%GREELEY-WELD HFH OF CO: $376k → 9%ARCHULETA COUNTY HFH OF CO: $150k → 10%MESA COUNTY HFH OF CO: $213k → 11%LOVELAND HFH OF CO: $240k → 11%ST VRAIN VALLEY HFH OF CO: $240k → 12%METRO DENVER HFH OF CO: $1.0M → 12%SAN LUIS VALLEY HFH OF CO: $30k → 17%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL: $27k → 22%MONTEZUMA COUNTY HFH OF CO: $50k → 7%VAIL VALLEY HFH OF CO: $60k → 7%PIKES PEAK HFH OF CO: $150k → 9%GREELEY-WELD HFH OF CO: $346k → 9%ARCHULETA COUNTY HFH OF CO: $60k → 10%MESA COUNTY HFH OF CO: $75k → 11%LOVELAND HFH OF CO: $210k → 11%ST VRAIN VALLEY HFH OF CO: $200k → 12%METRO DENVER HFH OF CO: $540k → 12%GUNNISON VALLEY HFH OF CO: $30k → 7%FORT COLLINS HFH OF CO: $280k → 11%GRAND COUNTY HFH OF CO: $30k → 7%FORT COLLINS HFH OF CO: $269k → 11%MONTEZUMA COUNTY HFH OF CO: $30k → 7%FORT COLLINS HFH OF CO: $120k → 11%BERTHOUD HFH OF CO: $80k → 11%BERTHOUD HFH OF CO: $66k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$16M · 20 repeat orgs$246k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +44% since the first grant, against -15% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
5

Total granted

$16M
$216k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
-15%

Still filing today

100%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Housing & ShelterInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF METRO DENVER INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $2.9M · revenue +21%
  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ROARING FORK
    3× · 2023–2025 · $1.8M · revenue +70%
  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ST VRAIN VALLEY
    3× · 2023–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +44%

Funded once

  • CC
    CHAFFEE COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
    one grant, 2024 · $65k · revenue -17%
  • VV
    VAIL VALLEY HFH OF CO
    one grant, 2023 · $60k
  • WC
    WILL COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
    one grant, 2024 · $41k · revenue -15%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Habitat for Humanity International Scotts Bluff County

Most construction work is performed by volunteers

—
2
Habitat Community Housing Development Inc

Development of affordable housing

—
3
Habitat for Humanity International Inc

Seeking to put gods love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

—
4
Habitat for Humanity International Inc

To eliminate poverty, housing and homelessness from the face of the earth by constructing and building adequate and basic housing.

—
5
Habitat for Humanity of Grant County Inc

To create decent affordable housing for those in need and to make decent shelter a matter of conscience with people everywhere.

—
6
Habitat for Humanity International Wabash County Hfh

Wabash county habitat for humanity, inc. is a non-profit organization working in partnership with god and people everywhere, from all walks of life, to build decent, affordable housing.

—
7
Habitat for Humanity International Inc

To put God's love into action, Habitat for Humanity brings people together to build homes, communities, and hope.

—
8
Habitat for Humanity Pennyrile Region Inc

To provide affordable housing and financing to low income families.

Housing & Shelter
9
Habitat for Humanity the Wind River Country

The organization builds homes for low income families.

—
10
Habitat for Humanity of Greater Fredericksburg Texas Inc

Provision of decent, affordable housing for lower income families.

—
11
Habitat for Humanity of the San Gorgonio Pass Area

Construct low income housing for families who live in substandard dwellings and cannot afford to improve their living standards by conventional means.

—
12
Habitat for Humanity Greater Wenatchee Area

Our mission is to provide decent and affordable housing to eligible families in partnership with god, the families and our community.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Habitat for Humanity St Vrain Valley; the most unlike its peers is Greeley Area Habitat for Humanity. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
14/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF METRO DENVER INC: $2,871,827 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF METRO DENVER INCHABITAT FOR HUMANITY VAIL VALLEY INC: $2,337,360 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY VAIL VALLEY INCHABITAT FOR HUMANITY ROARING FORK: $1,832,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY ROARING FORKHABITAT FOR HUMANITY ST VRAIN VALLEY: $1,051,070 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY ST VRAIN VALLEYPIKES PEAK HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $924,052 · OtherPIKES PEAK HABITAT FOR HUMANITYLOVELAND HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $818,860 · OtherLOVELAND HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC+12 more: $1,497,440 · Other+12 moreGREELEY AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $2,158,360 · Housing & ShelterGREELEY AREA HABITAT FOR HUMAN…HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF MESA COUNTY: $747,977 · Housing & ShelterHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF MESA C…FORT COLLINS HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $669,000 · Housing & ShelterFORT COLLINS HABITAT FOR HUMAN…Habitat for Humanity of Boulder Valley: $360,000 · Housing & ShelterHabitat for Humanity of Boulde…HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF THE SAN JUANS: $194,360 · Housing & ShelterHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GRAND COUNTY: $159,569 · Housing & Shelter+1 more: $40,500 · Housing & ShelterHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC: $183,745 · International
Other$11,332,609Housing & Shelter$4,329,766International$183,745

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF METRO DENVER INC: $2,871,827 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY VAIL VALLEY INC: $2,337,360 over 2y, 13% of budgetGREELEY AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $2,158,360 over 3y, 11% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY ROARING FORK: $1,832,000 over 3y, 9.8% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY ST VRAIN VALLEY: $1,051,070 over 3y, 14% of budgetPIKES PEAK HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $924,052 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetLOVELAND HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $818,860 over 3y, 6.3% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF MESA COUNTY: $747,977 over 3y, 8.8% of budgetFORT COLLINS HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $669,000 over 3y, 5.2% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF ARCHULETA COUNTY INC: $367,860 over 3y, 6.0% of budgetHabitat for Humanity of Boulder Valley: $360,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetBLUE SPRUCE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $270,360 over 2y, 8.8% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF THE SAN JUANS: $194,360 over 2y, 8.0% of budgetSummit Habitat for Humanity: $190,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC: $183,745 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GRAND COUNTY: $159,569 over 3y, 42% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GUNNISON VALLEY: $150,000 over 2y, 62% of budgetBERTHOUD HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $146,360 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetSAN LUIS VALLEY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $87,860 over 2y, 18% of budgetHabitat For Humanity International Inc Habitat for Humanity of Montezuma County: $80,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetCHAFFEE COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $65,000 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetWILL COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $40,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF LARAMIE COUNTY INC: $30,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF PUEBLO INC: $30,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF MCHENRY COU: $20,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Habitat for Humanity …Colorado Gives Founda…Anschutz Family Found…Thrivent Financial fo…Nebraska Community Fo…The Denver FoundationColorado Association …Community Foundation …The Colorado Health F…Mark and Linda Kissel…Otter Cares Foundatio…Enterprise Holdings F…
Habitat for Humanity International IncGA51.2× affinity23 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Habitat for Humanity International Inc · Colorado Gives Foundation · Anschutz Family Foundation · Thrivent Financial for Lutherans-Group · Nebraska Community Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Colorado Association of Realtors Foundation · Community Foundation of Northern Colorado · The Colorado Health Foundation · Mark and Linda Kissel Family Foundation · Otter Cares Foundation AKA OTTERCARES FOUNDATION · Enterprise Holdings Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Habitat for Humanity of Colorado Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Habitat for Humanity of Colorado Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Habitat for Humanity of Colorado’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home