· Public charity
Gvec Charitable Foundation
To provide funding assistance to local non-profit groups and civic organizations for community development and improvement projects and provide assistance for low income individuals within the guadalupe valley electric cooperative service area.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 20 grants below total $368,078 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $407,735 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $39,657 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHISHOLM TRAIL HERITAGE MUSEUM | $20,000 |
| CITY OF NEW BERLIN | $20,000 |
| CUERO VFD | $20,000 |
| MEYERSVILLE ISD | $20,000 |
| COMAL COUNTY FAMILY VIOLENCE SHELTER | $20,000 |
| CITY OF CIBOLO | $20,000 |
| MARION VFD | $20,000 |
| YOAKUM ISD - HIGH SCHOOL | $20,000 |
| KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS HALLETTSVILLE | $20,000 |
| GONZALES COUNTY VETERANS MEMORIAL ASSOCIATION | $20,000 |
| DEWITT MEDICAL FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| NIXON METHODIST CHURCH | $20,000 |
| THOMPSONVILLE CEMETERY ASSOCIATION | $19,461 |
| ANDER-WESER VFD | $18,283 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF SAN ANTONIO AND GUADALUPE VALLEY | $17,506 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–23, $63k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 13% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
12 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 8% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $338k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- DMDEWITT MEDICAL FOUNDATION2× · 2018–2021 · $40k · revenue +38% · 80% of their budget
- YMYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SAN ANTONIO2× · 2017–2020 · $40k · revenue +7%
- GRGUADALUPE REGIONAL MEDICAL FOUNDATION2× · 2018–2021 · $40k · revenue +55%
Funded once
- PCPILOT CLUB INTERNATIONALone grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue -6%
- YAYOAKUM AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCEgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue +68% · 30% of their budget
- TDTEATRO DE ARTES DE JUAN SEGUINone grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue +4%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide fire and medical emergency services for the city of garrison, tx and the surrounding districts.
Provide firefighting services for frelsburg, texas area.
Provide fire fighting & ambulance service to hankamer, texas and surrounding areas.
Volunteer fire department
Firesurpression,trainingandeducation.
Volunteer fire department organized to contain fires in and around the city of tolar, county of hood, texas
To provide fire protection, education, emergency medical treatment and rescue services to approx 140 sq miles in guadalupe county texas.
Provide fire, medical and mutual aid services.
To provide basic life support, fire protection, first response, medical emergency, and mutual aid in the community of Yantis, Texas and surrounding area of Wood County.
Fire fighting and prevention
Volunteer fire department
Volunteer Fire Department, providing fire, rescue, and medical services to a population of approximately 22,000 residents, 24 hours per day, 365 days per year.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chisholm Trail Heritage Museum Inc and the most unlike its peers is Seguin-Guadalupe County Heritage Museum Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.8% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
65 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 65 of the 130 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds DEWITT MEDICAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Columbus Club of Hallettsville Texas Inc ↗
- Who funds La Vernia Historical Association ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SAN ANTONIO ↗
- Who funds GUADALUPE REGIONAL MEDICAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OTTINE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT ↗
- Who funds Gonzales County Senior Citizens Association Inc ↗
- Who funds PILOT CLUB INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds YOAKUM AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
- Who funds COMAL COUNTY FAMILY VIOLENCE SHELTER ↗
- Who funds TEATRO DE ARTES DE JUAN SEGUIN ↗
- Who funds McQueeney Volunteer Fire Department ↗
- Who funds HALLETTSVILLE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT ↗
- Who funds LITTLE LEAGUE BASEBALL INC ↗
- Who funds The New Berlin Community Club of Ne ↗
- Who funds CAMP CUMMINS ACTIVITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds Gonzales Noon Lions Club Foundation ↗
- Who funds YORKTOWN WESTERN DAYS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds TEXAS AGRICULTURAL EDUCATION & HERITAGE CENTER ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF SOUTH CENTRAL TEXAS INC ↗
- Who funds SEGUIN CONSERVATION SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds La Vernia Education Foundation ↗
- Who funds GREATER LA VERNIA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Guadalupe County United Way · San Antonio Area Foundation · Su-Cla Foundation · Harvey E Najim Charitable Foundation · Dickson-Allen Foundation · The Gvtc Foundation Inc · John L Santikos Charitable Foundation · New Braunfels Area Community Foundation · San Antonio Food Bank · Union Pacific Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Gvec Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.