· Public charity
Guadalupe County United Way
Improve the quality of life throughout Guadalupe County by raising and allocating funds to addres a broad range of health, well-being, and human service needs.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 9 grants below total $74,083 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $191,412 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $117,329 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k7 grants · $50k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $24k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Salvation Army Seguin Unit | $13,750 |
| SO TX Pregnancy Care Center | $10,000 |
| Family Life Center | $9,000 |
| GV Habitat for Humanity | $8,000 |
| Redwood Comm Center | $8,000 |
| DAVA Unit 61 | $8,000 |
| GRASP | $6,000 |
| Family Violence Shelter | $5,833 |
| Children's Advocacy | $5,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $311k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 24% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.
16 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GCGuadalupe County Children's Advocacy Center9× · 2017–2025 · $123k · revenue +122%
- GVGUADALUPE VALLEY FAMILY VIOLENCE SHELTER9× · 2017–2025 · $110k · revenue +89%
- TDTEATRO DE ARTES DE JUAN SEGUIN8× · 2017–2024 · $106k · revenue +4%
Funded once
- SMSAN MARCOS CISDone grant, 2023 · $9k
- T1TRULIGHT 127 MINISTRIES INCone grant, 2020 · $8k · revenue +4%
- SYSEGUIN YOUTH SERVICES INCone grant, 2020 · $8k · revenue +11%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Pregnancy counseling
Santa Fe Family Service helps individuals & families within the Santa Fe Independent School District by counsel, guidance, and other necessary assistance to achieve normal living, or the best possible adjustment for the welfare of the…
Community development
To provide services designed to meet the physical, social, and emotional needs of domestic violence and sexual assault victims by providing for immediate, short, and long-term needs.
Provide mental health counseling to needy families and persons in south central Oklahoma
Great oaks is committed to serving the emotional and relational needs of the gallatin valley by providing clinically excellent individual, marriage and family therapy.
Provide no-cost nutritional assistance for adults and children in seguin and guadalupe county, texas
Saafe house is committed to empowering victims of family violence and sexual assault by providing individualized, immediate, free, and confidential services. our goal is to prevent family violence.
The center is fully operational treatment facility involving child victims of physical and sexual abuse. Children affected by abuse were provided with therapy and professional guidance through the legal and counseling system which the…
To provide services for the protection of abused and neglected children that are in the custody of the State of Texas.
The pregnancy help center of san gabriel provides a safe caring environment where women who may be pregnant or who are pregnant can be supported with dignity during and after pregnancy.
GNDC celebrates over 40 years of service to its community as high quality affordable housing provider to families from East Austin. GNDC also works for the improvement, revitalization and preservation of the residential neighborhood. GNDC…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Guadalupe Valley Family Violence Shelter and the most unlike its peers is South Texas Pregnancy Care Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Guadalupe County Children's Advocacy Center ↗
- Who funds GUADALUPE VALLEY FAMILY VIOLENCE SHELTER ↗
- Who funds TEATRO DE ARTES DE JUAN SEGUIN ↗
- Who funds SOUTH TEXAS PREGNANCY CARE CENTER ↗
- Who funds REDWOOD COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER RANDOLPH AREA SERVICES PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY LIFE CENTER OF NEW BRAUNFELS ↗
- Who funds Disabled American Veterans Auxiliary ↗
- Who funds GUADALUPE REGIONAL MEDICAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COMAL COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Guadalupe Valley Christian Counseling Center ↗
- Who funds SEGUIN-GUADALUPE COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER ↗
- Who funds GUADALUPE VALLEY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
- Who funds TRULIGHT 127 MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds SEGUIN YOUTH SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds TCP COUNSELING & WELLNESS SERVICES TCP MARRIAGE & FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY COUNCIL OF SOUTH CENTRAL TEXAS INC ↗
- Who funds SAN ANTONIO AREA FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Gvec Charitable Foundation · San Antonio Area Foundation · John L Santikos Charitable Foundation · San Antonio Food Bank · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Guadalupe County United Way funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.