Skip to content
Guilford County Partnership for Children Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Guilford County Partnership for Children Inc

The Guilford County Partnership for Children is a local non-profit strategically directing Smart Start and NC Pre-K funding to ensure equitable access to high quality childcare, professional development for early childhood educators and caregivers, family support and pre-literacy programs.

$15M
Granted FY2025still arriving
28
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$4.6M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$72MHealth$7.6MHuman Services$6.4M
02FY2025 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $19k
  • $50k–250k15 grants · $1.9M
  • $250k+12 grants · $13M
$209,948
Median grant
4
States reached
$969k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Guilford County Public Schools$4,642,560
Childcare Network$1,831,293
Generation Ed$1,820,964
UNC-Greensboro$967,328
Guilford Co Health & Human Services$960,056
Kid Appeal Learning Center$501,143
Triad Child Development Center$363,095
His Glory Child Development Center$363,095
Family Service of the Piedmont$357,500
ABG Provider Service$258,840
DePaul Academy$258,840
KUEHG Corp$255,964
YWCA-High Point$246,690
Kindernoggin$209,948
Family Support Network of Central Carolina$150,898
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $19.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%DE PAUL ACADEMY: $252k → 14%DE PAUL ACADEMY: $231k → 14%Family Service of the Piedmont: $358k → 16%Family Service of the Piedmont: $357k → 16%DePaul Academy: $259k → 16%Family Service of the Piedmon: $339k → 16%DePaul Academy: $256k → 16%Family Service of the Piedmon: $293k → 16%DePaul Academy: $255k → 16%FAMILY SERVICE OF THE PIEDMONT: $291k → 16%DePaul Academy: $248k → 16%FAMILY SERVICE OF THE PIEDMONT: $285k → 16%Family Support Network of Central Carolina: $169k → 16%Family Support Network of Central Carolina: $151k → 16%HAYES-TAYLOR YMCA: $126k → 16%HAYES-TAYLOR YMCA: $124k → 16%Hayes-Taylor YMCA: $100k → 16%YWCA-High Point: $326k → 16%YWCA-High Point: $247k → 16%YWCA - High Point: $187k → 16%YWCA - High Point: $24k → 16%Family Support Ntwrk Cen Car: $159k → 16%FAMILY SUPPORT NETWORK OF CENTRAL CAROLINA: $156k → 16%Family Support Ntwrk Cen Car: $156k → 16%FAMILY SUPPORT NETWORK OF CENTRAL CAROLINA: $117k → 16%Children & Families First: $2.9M → 16%GUILFORD CHILD DEVELOPMENT: $2.5M → 16%GUILFORD CHILD DEVELOPMENT: $2.4M → 16%Children & Families First: $2.1M → 16%Children and Families First: $1.9M → 16%Generation Ed: $1.8M → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$86M · 34 repeat orgs$157k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +15% since the first grant, against -6% for those funded once.

34 repeat relationships: 28 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
1

Total granted

$86M
$157k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
-6%

Still filing today

26%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthPublic Safety & DisasterEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • G
    GENERATIONED
    6× · 2020–2025 · $14M · revenue +12%
  • FS
    FAMILY SERVICE OF THE PIEDMONT INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $1.9M · revenue +11%
  • TA
    Triad Adult & Pediatric Medicine Inc
    4× · 2020–2023 · $1.3M · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • BC
    BENNETT COLLEGE
    one grant, 2020 · $157k · revenue -6%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Carolina Family Health Centers Inc

Carolina Family Health Centers, Inc. provides accessible and affordable health care with excellence...where patients come FIRST

—
2
Guilford Center for Children Inc

Guilford Center for Children, Inc. provides two major programs: an NAEYC accredited early education program for children ages 3 to 5 and a before and after school for children ages 5 through 12 years old for working families in Guilford.

Human Services
3
Ywca Greensboro

Provides support empowerment enrichment and educational programs for adult mothers and their children teen mothers and their children middle school students and the community at large.

—
4
Young Women's Christian Association of Greater Green Bay Inc

The ywca is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women and promoting peace, justice, freedom, and dignity for all.

Human Services
5
Greater Quincy Child Care Center Inc

Daycare for infants, toddlers, and preschool children.

Human Services
6
Community Coordinated Child Care Inc

To ensure that every child has access to high quality early care and education through integrated support and equitable practices.

Human Services
7
South Carolina Network of Children's Advocacy Centers

Empowering south carolina communities and children's advocacy centers to deliver a best practice response to child abuse

Youth Development
8
Young Women's Christian Association Greater Pittsburgh

Ywca greater pittsburgh is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women and promoting peace, justice, freedom and dignity for all. we envision a community that advances education, opportunity, and equity regardless of gender, race, or…

Human Services
9
Richmond County Partnership for Children Inc

Richmond County Partnership for Children advances a high-quality, accountable system of care and early education for each child beginning with a healthy birth, and supports families to improve early childhood health and development to…

Education
10
Carolina Family Connections

Recruit and train and license foster parents to receive foster children from county government agencies.

Human Services
11
Ywca of the Lower Cape Fear Inc

Dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women, and promoting peace, justice, freedom, and dignity for all.

Human Services
12
Gardner Family Care Corporation

Gardner Family Care Corporation is dedicated to improving the health status of the communities we serve, especially the disenfranchised, disadvantaged and most vulnerable members. Our mission is to provide high quality, comprehensive…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Generationed; the most unlike its peers is Parents As Teachers Guilford County. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Guilford Co Public Schools: $26,040,828 · OtherGuilford Co Public SchoolsCHILDCARE NETWORK INC: $11,478,629 · OtherCHILDCARE NETWORK INCTHE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO: $5,466,014 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBOROGUILFORD COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES: $5,357,512 · OtherGUILFORD COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICESKid Appeal Learning Center: $2,971,826 · Other+21 more: $13,956,324 · Other+21 moreGENERATIONED: $13,692,917 · Human ServicesGENERATIONEDFAMILY SERVICE OF THE PIEDMONT INC: $1,922,491 · Human ServicesFAMILY SERVICE OF THE PIE…SISTERS OF CHARITY ST VINCENT DEPAUL SOCIAL MINIST: $1,500,377 · Human ServicesSISTERS OF CHARITY ST VIN…FAMILY SUPPORT NETWORK OF CENTRAL CAROLINA: $908,436 · Human ServicesYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF HIGH POINT NC INC: $783,644 · Human Services+1 more: $349,890 · Human ServicesTriad Adult & Pediatric Medicine Inc: $1,250,711 · HealthEVERY BABY GUILFORD INC: $448,384 · Public Safety & DisasterBENNETT COLLEGE: $157,260 · Education
Other$65,271,133Human Services$19,157,755Health$1,250,711Public Safety & Disaster$448,384Education$157,260

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGENERATIONED: $13,692,917 over 6y, 10% of budgetFAMILY SERVICE OF THE PIEDMONT INC: $1,922,491 over 6y, 3.7% of budgetSISTERS OF CHARITY ST VINCENT DEPAUL SOCIAL MINIST: $1,500,377 over 6y, 86% of budgetTriad Adult & Pediatric Medicine Inc: $1,250,711 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetFAMILY SUPPORT NETWORK OF CENTRAL CAROLINA: $908,436 over 6y, 47% of budgetYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF HIGH POINT NC INC: $783,644 over 4y, 16% of budgetPARENTS AS TEACHERS GUILFORD COUNTY: $495,841 over 3y, 81% of budgetEVERY BABY GUILFORD INC: $448,384 over 4y, 59% of budgetREADING CONNECTIONS INC: $398,408 over 6y, 9.9% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of Greensboro Inc: $349,890 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetBENNETT COLLEGE: $157,260 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GENERATIONED ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY SERVICE OF THE PIEDMONT INC ↗
  • Who funds SISTERS OF CHARITY ST VINCENT DEPAUL SOCIAL MINIST ↗
  • Who funds Triad Adult & Pediatric Medicine Inc ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY SUPPORT NETWORK OF CENTRAL CAROLINA ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF HIGH POINT NC INC ↗
  • Who funds PARENTS AS TEACHERS GUILFORD COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds EVERY BABY GUILFORD INC ↗
  • Who funds READING CONNECTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds Young Men's Christian Association of Greensboro Inc ↗
  • Who funds BENNETT COLLEGE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …Lincoln Financial Fou…Ready for School Read…United Way of Greater…High Point Community …The Mary Lynn Richard…Moses H Cone Memorial…The Hummel Family Fun…Moses Cone - Wesley L…Tannenbaum-Sternberge…Hillsdale FundSecond Harvest Food B…
Community Foundation of Greater Greensboro IncNC19.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Greater Greensboro Inc · Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc · Ready for School Ready for Life · United Way of Greater Greensboro Inc · High Point Community Foundation · The Mary Lynn Richardson Fund · Moses H Cone Memorial Hospital Operating Corporation · The Hummel Family Fund Inc · Moses Cone - Wesley Long Community Health Foundation · Tannenbaum-Sternberger Foundation Inc · Hillsdale Fund · Second Harvest Food Bank of Northwest Nc Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Guilford County Partnership for Children Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Guilford County Partnership for Children Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Guilford County Partnership for Children’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home